Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the relationship between household financial conditions and children’s participation in Early Childhood Education (ECE) institutions in Indonesia, focusing on household income and Debt Service Ratio (DSR).


Research Method: This study employs a quantitative approach using secondary data from the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS-5) conducted in 2014–2015 across 13 provinces. The final sample consists of 775 household observations. Preschool participation is measured as a binary variable covering ECE, kindergarten, and playgroup participation. The analysis applies Binary Logistic Regression using Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE).


Results and Discussion: The findings show that household income is positively associated with preschool participation across all models. DSR also shows statistically significant associations across several specifications, although the relationship should be interpreted with caution, as DSR reflects only the household debt repayment burden. Stronger associations are identified in regency areas than in municipalities.


Implications: The study highlights the importance of improving household economic resilience and equitable access to preschools.


Originality: This study integrates the household debt repayment burden into the analysis of preschool participation using Indonesian household-level survey data.

Keywords

early childhood education debt service ratio household income preschool participation ECE DSR IFLS

Article Details

How to Cite
Sumayku, I. R., & Sumanti, E. (2026). Household Income, Debt Service Ratio, and Early Childhood Education Participation in Indonesia. Advances in Economics & Financial Studies, 4(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.60079/aefs.v4i2.797

References

  1. Attanasio, O. P., Meghir, C., & Santiago, A. (2013). Education choices in Mexico: Using a structural model and a randomized experiment to evaluate PROGRESA. Review of Economic Studies, 79(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr015
  2. Axford, N., & Berry, V. (2023). Money matters: Time for prevention and early intervention to address family economic circumstances. Journal of Prevention, 44(2), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-023-00723-x
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Laporan Indikator Kerentanan Finansial Rumah Tangga Indonesia 2024. BPS RI.
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Statistik pendidikan anak usia dini 2025. BPS RI.
  5. Barnett, W. S. (2008). Preschool education and its lasting effects: Research and policy implications. National Institute for Early Education Research.
  6. Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  7. Bendini, M., & Devercelli, A. E. (2022). Quality early childhood education and care: The right start for every child. World Bank Publications.
  8. Berger, L. M., & Houle, J. N. (2019). Rising household debt and children’s socioemotional well-being trajectories. Demography, 56(2), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00758-2
  9. Berlinski, S., Galiani, S., & Gertler, P. (2009). The effect of pre-school on primary school performance. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.08.006
  10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
  11. Choudhury, S., Sen, A., & Gupta, R. (2023). Determinants of preschool participation in emerging economies: Evidence from India. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, Article 102118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102118
  12. Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551
  13. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97(2), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.2.31
  14. Currie, J. (2001). Early childhood education programs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.213
  15. Darojah, S., Khoirunurrofik, K., & Zamroni, M. (2024). Analisis faktor ekonomi terhadap partisipasi PAUD di perdesaan Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, 15(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.22212/jekp.v15i1.2461
  16. Gayle, V., Murray, S., & Cullis, A. (2018). Young children’s participation in early childhood education and care. Contemporary Social Science, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2017.1402235
  17. Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128898
  18. Heckman, J. J. (2011). The economics of inequality: The value of early childhood education. American Educator, 35(1), 31–47.
  19. Hutton, M., Beise, J., & Little, M. (2023). Global consensus on early childhood education: Breaking the poverty cycle (UNICEF Research Report). UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/reports/global-consensus-ece-2023
  20. Keese, M. (2009). Household debt and financial distress: Evidence from the German Socio-Economic Panel (Ruhr Economic Papers No. 126). Leibniz Institute for Economic Research.
  21. Kim, J., Jaimovich, N., & Kim, H. (2022). Political priority and public spending on early childhood education. International Journal of Educational Development, 92, Article 102615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102615
  22. Kusumah, C. K. (2025). From Campaigns to Systems: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Indonesia’s One Village, One ECE. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 6(3), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v6i3.890
  23. Lochner, L., & Monge-Naranjo, A. (2011). The nature of credit constraints and human capital. American Economic Review, 101(6), 2487–2529. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2487
  24. Magnuson, K. A., Meyers, M. K., Ruhm, C. J., & Waldfogel, J. (2004). Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 115–157. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041001115
  25. Monica, T., Ismaniar Ismaniar, & Lili Dasa Putri. (2025). Tantangan dan Solusi Pendanaan Lembaga PAUD: Ketergantungan Iuran Orang Tua dan Minimnya Dukungan Eksternal. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(4 SE-Articles), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.61132/paud.v2i4.778
  26. Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2013). Scarcity: Why having too little means so much. Times Books.
  27. Neuman, M. J., & Powers, S. (2021). Political priority for early childhood education: A comparative analysis. UNESCO Publishing.
  28. Pujihasvuty, R., Nasution, S. L., Fajarningtiyas, D. N., Naibaho, M. M. P., Oktriyanto, Sari, D. P., Amrullah, H., Rahmadhony, A., Muthmainnah, M., & Devi, Y. P. (2024). Family economic resilience and early childhood parenting practices. British Journal of Midwifery, 32(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2024.32.1.22
  29. Salam, A., Al Izzati, R. A., & Suryadarma, D. (2021). Financial health and education investment in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 36(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.63661
  30. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
  31. Sosu, E. M., & Schmidt, P. (2022). Income volatility and educational investment in low-income families. Social Science Research, 104, Article 102688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2021.102688
  32. Suharti. (2013, October). Early childhood education in Indonesia: An investment for a better generation [Paper presentation]. World Bank Conference, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  33. Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S., & Rogers, F. H. (2006). From school enrollment to student learning in Indonesia (SMERU Working Paper). SMERU Research Institute.
  34. Takerubun, C., & Marsisno, W. (2021). Pengaruh Faktor Keluarga Terhadap Partisipasi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Di Papua Barat. Seminar Nasional Official Statistics, 2020(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.34123/semnasoffstat.v2020i1.460
  35. Tolani, N., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2008). Family support, international trends. In Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development (pp. 538–548). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370877-9.00062-8
  36. Ulfa, Y. B., & Djamaluddin, S. (2023). The Correlation Between Parents’education And Early Childhood Education Enrolment Decisions. Golden Age: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 7(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.29313/ga:jpaud.v7i1.11828
  37. Umayna, F. ., Shalahuddin, S., Darmawan, D., Long, A. H., Gulabdin, S., Sondoh, S. L. ., & Sidin, J. P. (2025). Increasing Competitive Advantage with Creativity and Innovation: The Moderating Effect of Digital Leadership. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 3(3), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v3i3.490
  38. UNICEF. (2019). A world ready to learn: Prioritizing quality early childhood education. https://www.unicef.org/reports/a-world-ready-to-learn-2019
  39. Wang, D., Shen, M., & Wu, X. (2026). Socioeconomic status and inequalities in early development of non-cognitive skills: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 95, Article 102586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102586
  40. World Bank. (2020). Indonesia economic quarterly: Investing in people. World Bank Group.
  41. World Bank. (2021). The role of public investment in early childhood development. World Bank Group.
  42. Yazejian, N., Bryant, D., Freel, K., & Spieker, S. (2015). High-quality early education: Age of entry and time in care differences in student outcomes for English-only and dual language learners. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.04.001
  43. Ybrayev, Z., Zharkynbay, T., Baizakov, A., & Kairullayev, Y. (2026). Household income distribution and financial debt: Five analytical patterns of consumer indebtedness from Kazakhstan. Asian Affairs, 57(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2025.2601979
  44. Yeung, W. J. J., & Chen, J. (2023). Family income and child development: A multi-generational perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 49, 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-031021-111158