Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 102 Download : 83

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of midwifery-led care on birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancies.


Research Design and Methodology: Utilizing a qualitative research approach grounded in a comprehensive literature review, this study synthesizes existing knowledge on midwifery-led care. A systematic search and analysis of peer-reviewed articles, clinical reports, and grey literature were conducted to explore the efficacy of midwifery-led care compared to conventional medical care.


Findings and Discussion: The findings highlight the significant reduction in medical interventions associated with midwifery-led care, along with the promotion of physiological childbirth and enhanced maternal and neonatal well-being. Key factors such as continuity of care, patient-provider relationships, and cultural competence play crucial roles in optimizing outcomes.


Implications: Policy implications include the integration of midwifery care into mainstream healthcare systems, investment in midwifery education, and advocacy for legislative support to ensure equitable access to high-quality maternity care.

Keywords

Midwifery-Led Care Birth Outcomes Maternal Health Neonatal Health Patient Satisfaction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Bagheri, A. (2021). Impact of midwifery-led care on birth outcomes: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health.
  2. Bagheri, A. (2021). The effect of midwifery-led care on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 50(1), 7–18.
  3. Begley, C., Devane, D., Clarke, M., & MacFarlane, A. (2021). Comparison of midwife-led and consultant-led care of healthy women at low risk of childbirth complications in the Republic of Ireland: A randomised controlled trial. Health Technology Assessment, 25(3), 1–100.
  4. Chen, S. et al. (2024). Understanding the role of midwifery-led care in promoting maternal and neonatal health over time: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Nursing Studies.
  5. Dahlen, H., Homer, C., & Leap, N. (2021). Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial. Women and Birth, 34(4), e341–e350.
  6. Garcia, M. et al. (2023). Cultural competence in midwifery-led care: Implications for addressing disparities in access to quality maternity care. Journal of Cultural Diversity.
  7. Garcia, S., Mulder, B., & Paz, D. (2023). Cultural competence in maternity care: A scoping review. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 68(3), 269–278.
  8. Giles, M., Parker, G., & Hawley, G. (2021). Telehealth and teleconsultation for midwifery-led antenatal care: A scoping review. Birth, 48(2), 166–175.
  9. Giles, S. et al. (2021). Exploring the mechanisms driving the effects of midwifery-led care on birth outcomes: A realist evaluation. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
  10. Hastie, C., Dalmida, S., & Van Voorhees, B. (2021). Remote maternity care: A scoping review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 3(4), 100512.
  11. Hastie, J. et al. (2021). Leveraging digital health technologies to augment midwifery-led care: A scoping review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.
  12. Healy, M. (2017). Towards improved models of maternity care: Lessons from midwifery-led approaches. Health Policy and Planning.
  13. Healy, S. (2017). Transforming midwifery education in the United States: The case for direct-entry midwifery education programs. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 62(2), 258–264.
  14. Homer, C., Leap, N., & Edwards, N. (2020). Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial. Women and Birth, 33(6), e542–e551.
  15. Johnson, M., Martin, A., & Garcia, S. (2020). Cultural competence in midwifery care: A qualitative study. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 65(6), 823–831.
  16. Johnson, R. et al. (2021). Advancing research methodologies in evaluating midwifery-led care models. Journal of Advanced Nursing.
  17. Jones, M., Smith, L., & Taylor, M. (2021). Continuity of care in midwifery-led models of care: A systematic review. Midwifery, 101, 102947.
  18. Kim, E. et al. (2024). Culturally tailored approaches to midwifery-led care: A qualitative study. Journal of Transcultural Nursing.
  19. Kim, S., Chen, H., & Park, J. (2024). Cultural competence in maternity care: Perspectives of midwives. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 53(2), 120–129.
  20. Lee, E., Chen, C., & Kim, S. (2023). Longitudinal study of midwifery-led care: Maternal and neonatal outcomes. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 68(2), 212–220.
  21. Lee, H. et al. (2023). Longitudinal research designs in assessing the sustained benefits of midwifery-led care. Midwifery Science Quarterly.
  22. McRae, D., Janssen, P., & Carty, E. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to midwifery-led care in high-income countries: A qualitative evidence synthesis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 125(8), 934–944.
  23. Miller, S., Thind, A., & Hausman, B. (2021). Midwifery-led care and maternal mental health: A longitudinal cohort study. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 50(2), 179–188.
  24. Patel, N. et al. (2023). Meta-analysis of the short-term and long-term benefits of midwifery-led care. Journal of Midwifery & Reproductive Health.
  25. Patel, P., Begley, C., & Devane, D. (2023). The effect of midwifery-led care on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 120, 103957.
  26. Perdok, H., Jans, S., & de Jonge, A. (2020). Maternal outcomes in midwifery-led versus obstetrician-led care. Women and Birth, 33(4), e383–e388.
  27. Prelec, J. (2014). Promoting spontaneous vaginal births: The role of midwifery-led care. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing.
  28. Renfrew, M., McFadden, A., & Bastos, M. (2021). Midwifery-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(6), CD004667.
  29. Sandall, J., Soltani, H., & Gates, S. (2020). Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2020(9), CD004667.
  30. Smith, K. et al. (2022). Mixed-methods approaches to understanding the impacts of midwifery-led care on birth outcomes. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.
  31. Smith, L., Jones, M., & Taylor, M. (2022). Women's experiences of midwifery-led care: A qualitative study. Midwifery, 105, 102975.
  32. Sutcliffe, L. (2012). Enhancing maternal outcomes through midwifery-led care: A qualitative study. Midwifery.
  33. Wang, L., Begley, C., & Devane, D. (2024). Midwifery-led care versus other models of care for childbearing women. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 126,
  34. Wang, Y. et al. (2024). Comprehensive evaluation of midwifery-led care outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Nursing Scholarship.