Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 385 Download : 140

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the effect of competence and professional skepticism on audit quality among auditors at the Papua Provincial Inspectorate Office. Understanding how these internal factors contribute to audit quality is essential for improving the effectiveness of the auditing process.


Research Design and Methodology: The study employed a quantitative research approach using primary data collected through questionnaires distributed to auditors at the Papua Provincial Inspectorate. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, resulting in a sample of 32 respondents. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, including validity and reliability tests, classical assumption tests, multiple linear regression analysis, and hypothesis testing.


Findings and Discussion: The results revealed that professional competence and professional skepticism positively and significantly impact audit quality. Competent auditors demonstrated a higher ability to detect errors and ensure the accuracy of financial statements. In contrast, auditors with higher skepticism were more likely to question evidence and identify potential misstatements during the audit process.


Implications: These findings highlight the importance of enhancing auditors' competence and fostering professional skepticism through continuous training and certification programs. Future research should explore additional variables influencing audit quality, such as auditor independence, ethical standards, and institutional support.

Keywords

audit quality professional competence professional skepticism

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Z. D. Siahay, A., C. Seralurin, Y., Ervina, M. T., & Pattiasina, V. (2023). Professional Competence and Skepticism on Audit Quality. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i2.114
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. A’yun, Q., & Kurnia, K. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi (JIRA), 6(7). https://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/1283
  2. Anam, H., Tenggara, F. O., & Sari, D. K. (2020). Pengaruh Independensi, Kompetensi, Pengalaman dan Integritas Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 9(4), 1–19. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Hairul-
  3. Ananda, R. (2014). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional, Kepatuhan Pada Kode Etik Dan Independensi Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris pada BPKP perwakilan Sumatera Utara). Jurnal Akuntansi, 2(3).
  4. Ardaleni, N. K. Y., & Suputra, I. D. G. D. (2018). Pengaruh Etika Profesi Dan Keahlian Audit Pada Kinerja Auditor Dengan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 25, 1448. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2018.v25.i02.p24
  5. Averio, T. (2021). The analysis of influencing factors on the going concern audit opinion – a study in manufacturing firms in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0078
  6. Ayogu, M. (2023). Fostering Transparency and Accountability Enhancing Statutory Audits in Nigeria. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 6(1 SE-Articles), 37–44. http://resdojournals.com/index.php/jbeo/article/view/232
  7. Butarbutar, T. E., & Pesak, P. J. (2021). Pengaruh work from home dan independensi terhadap kualitas audit internal aparat inspektorat dalam pengawasan keuangan daerah Kota Manado selama masa pandemi (Studi empiris pada Inspektorat Kota Manado). JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI DAN AUDITING" GOODWILL", 12(2), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v12i2.37221
  8. Chiang, C. (2016). Conceptualising the linkage between professional scepticism and auditor independence. Pacific Accounting Review, 28(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-08-2015-0034
  9. Christina, S. E. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Sumatera. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Ekonomi Volume, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.54964/liabilitas.v3i1.35
  10. Fatimah, I., & Suryanto, R. (2016). Pengaruh pengalaman auditor, independensi, tekanan waktu, dan skeptisisme profesional auditor terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan (fraud)(Studi Empiris pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Yogyakarta dan Semarang. UMY Repository, 1, 13–47.
  11. Firmansyah, A. (2018). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, skeptisisme Profesional, akuntabilitas, fee audit dan Objektivitas terhadap kualitas audit. STIE PERBANAS SURABAYA.
  12. Haliah, & Nirwana. (2019). The development of good governance model for performance improvement. International Journal of Excellence in Government, 1(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEG-09-2018-0004
  13. Harding, N., & Trotman, K. T. (2017). The effect of partner communications of fraud likelihood and skeptical orientation on auditors’ professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51576
  14. Heider, F. (1976). A conversation with Fritz Heider. New Directions in Attribution Research, 1, 47–61.
  15. Hilman, N., Laekkeng, M., & Amiruddin, A. (2021). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Skeptisme Profesional, Kompetensi Auditor, dan E-audit terhadap Kualitas Hasil Audit pada Kantor Inspektorat Daerah Kota Makassar. Invoice, 3(2), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.26618/inv.v3i2.6036
  16. Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45–97. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361
  17. Indrayani, I., Nurhatisyah, N., Damsar, D., & Wibisono, C. (2024). How does millennial employee job satisfaction affect performance? Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 14(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-01-2023-0004
  18. Kusuma, U. T. (2021). Pengaruh Independensi, Kompetensi, Audit Tenure, dan Rotasi Audit terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal KIAFE, 11(1), 52–66.
  19. Muhammad Attamimi Fikri, F. (2015). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Skeptisme Profesional Auditor. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi, 4(7), 1–22. https://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/3514?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  20. Muzahid, M., & Wijaya, I. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Auditor Pemerintah di Kabupaten Aceh Utara. Proceeding Seminar Nasional Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, 2(1), 93–96.
  21. Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
  22. Nugrahaeni, S. (2018). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Kompetensi, Independensi Dan Kompleksitas Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta. http://repository.upnvj.ac.id/id/eprint/3190
  23. Nurbaiti, A., & Prakasa, E. (2022). Analisis pengaruh indepedensi, task complexity, dan kompetensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(4), 3604–3615. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i4.1041
  24. Professional Standards of Public Accountants. (2011). SA Section 210. 04, 1–2.
  25. Quadackers, L., Groot, T., & Wright, A. (2014). Auditors’ professional skepticism: Neutrality versus presumptive doubt. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12052
  26. Rahmawati, D., Leviany, T., & Suryo, M. (2022). Pengaruh Due professional care dan Integritas terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal SIKAP (Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing Dan Perpajakan), 7(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v7i1.2112
  27. Santoso, R. D., Budi Riharjo, I., & Kurnia, K. (2020). Independensi, Integritas, Serta Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Skeptisisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Journal of Accounting Science, 4(2), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v4i2.559
  28. Santoso, R. D., & Riharjo, I. B. (2020). Independensi, Integritas, Serta Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Skeptisisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Journal of Accounting Science, 4(2), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v4i2.559
  29. Saputra, H. E., & Kuntadi, C. (2024). Pengaruh Pengetahuan, Kompetensi, Profesional terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Inovasi Ekonomi Syariah Dan Akuntansi, 1(3), 1–10.
  30. Savira, J. A., Rahmawati, R., & Ramadhan, A. (2021). Pengaruh kompetensi dan skeptisme profesional terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 9(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v9i1.435
  31. Setyana, H. D., Rono, S., & Nuraini, F. (2021). Pengalaman Kerja Auditor, Etika Auditor, Dan Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik. Sustainable Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.30651/stb.v1i1.9765
  32. Sihombing, S., Simanjuntak, M. O., Sinaga, R., & Wulandari, B. (2021). Pengaruh Kompetensi Auditor, Independensi Auditor, Pengalaman Auditor dan Profesionalisme terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Wilayah Kota Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 5(2), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v5i2.1122
  33. Sinurat, B. A., & Pangaribuan, H. (2022). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Etika, Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 7(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v7i1.161
  34. SPAP section 230 PSA No.4. (2001). SA Section 230 (PSA No. 04). Professional Standards of Public Accountants, 04, 8–9
  35. Sunyoto, D. (2016). Metodologi penelitian akuntansi. https://digilib.buddhidharma.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=10853&keywords=
  36. State Financial Examination Standards. (2017). State Financial Inspection Standards (SPKN). CPC Regulation No.1 2017, 1–104.
  37. Vitalis, A., Boritz, J. E., & Simeoni, L. (2024). Enhancing CPA competencies for internal audit roles. International Journal of Auditing, 28(3), 458–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12337