Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 295 Download : 156

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the impact of audit fee reductions on audit quality and stakeholder trust, exploring the broader implications of constrained resources and their effects on corporate governance, financial reporting reliability, and stakeholder perceptions.


Research Design and Methodology: Employing a qualitative approach through a systematic literature review (SLR), this study synthesizes findings from recent academic research across diverse contexts. Theoretical frameworks, particularly agency theory, are integrated to comprehensively understand the relationship between audit fees, audit quality, and stakeholder trust.


Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal that reduced audit fees significantly impact the allocation of resources such as time, professional expertise, and technology, leading to diminished audit quality. This compromises the auditors' ability to detect material misstatements and affects their independence and professional skepticism. Lower audit quality, in turn, erodes stakeholder trust in financial statements, creating long-term reputational risks and market instability. Contextual factors, including regulatory frameworks and cultural dimensions, are identified as moderators that influence these dynamics. The study highlights the need for adequate audit fees to maintain transparency, accountability, and trust in financial reporting.


Implications: This research contributes to the academic discourse by extending agency theory to include the financial and ethical challenges auditors face under cost constraints. Practically, it provides actionable insights for regulators, audit firms, and stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of balancing cost efficiency with audit quality. Recommendations include setting minimum audit fee standards, adopting advanced technologies, and enhancing auditor training to sustain trust and accountability in financial reporting systems.

Keywords

Audit Fee Audit Quality Stakeholder Trust Corporate Governance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rakhmadani, N. P., & Suzana, S. (2025). Analysis of the Impact of Audit Fee Reduction on Audit Quality and Stakeholder Trust. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 3(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v3i1.452
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abrar, N. A., Tjan, J. S., & Ikhtiari, K. (2023). Analyzing Audit Quality: Experience, Motivation, Audit Fees with Auditor Ethics as Moderator. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(2 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i2.111
  2. Adams, M. B. (1994). Agency Theory and the Internal Audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909410071133
  3. Ahmad, H., & Muslim, M. (2023). Negotiating Audit Fees: Strategies for Achieving Fair and Equitable Pricing in Audit Engagements. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(3 SE-Articles), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i3.272
  4. Alareeni, B. A. (2019). The associations between audit firm attributes and audit quality-specific indicators. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(1), 6–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-05-2017-1559
  5. Aly, S. A. S., Diab, A., & Abdelazim, S. I. (2023). Audit quality, firm value and audit fees: does audit tenure matter? Egyptian evidence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-04-2023-0203
  6. Alzeban, A. (2020). The impact of audit committee, CEO, and external auditor quality on the quality of financial reporting. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2019-0204
  7. Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big Data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1–27.
  8. Ayogu, M. (2023). Fostering Transparency and Accountability Enhancing Statutory Audits in Nigeria. Journal of Business and Economic Options, 6(1 SE-Articles), 37–44. http://resdojournals.com/index.php/jbeo/article/view/232
  9. Campa, D., Quagli, A., & Ramassa, P. (2025). The roles and interplay of enforcers and auditors in the context of accounting fraud: a review of the accounting literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAL-07-2023-0134
  10. Chen, H., Xing, L., & Zhou, H. (2020). Product market competition and audit fees: evidence from an emerging market. Asian Review of Accounting, 28(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-08-2019-0146
  11. Chung, H., & Kim, J. B. (2024). Product market competition and audit fees: new evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 39(6), 648–667. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2023-4148
  12. Ditkaew, K., & Suttipun, M. (2023). The impact of audit data analytics on audit quality and audit review continuity in Thailand. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-04-2022-0114
  13. Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., & Abdelfattah, T. (2023). The key audit matters and the audit cost: does governance matter? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 31(1), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-08-2022-0178
  14. Elswah, T., Abozaid, E., & Diab, A. (2024). Does financial reporting quality matter for the auditee characteristics-audit fees relationship? Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2023-0777
  15. Florou, A., Morricone, S., & Pope, P. F. (2020). Proactive financial reporting enforcement: Audit fees and financial reporting quality effects. The Accounting Review, 95(2), 167–197. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52497 Share Icon Share
  16. Gerrard, I., Houghton, K., & Woodliff, D. (1994). Audit Fees: . Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(7), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909410067534
  17. Hoitash, R., Markelevich, A., & Barragato, C. A. (2007). Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8), 761–786. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710819634
  18. Hollingsworth, C. W., Neal, T. L., & Reid, C. D. (2020). The effect of office changes within audit firms on clients’ audit quality and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52591
  19. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure BT - Economics Social Institutions: Insights from the Conferences on Analysis & Ideology (K. Brunner (ed.); pp. 163–231). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9257-3_8
  20. Kaawaase, T. K., Nairuba, C., Akankunda, B., & Bananuka, J. (2021). Corporate governance, internal audit quality and financial reporting quality of financial institutions. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(3), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-11-2020-0117
  21. Kasbar, M. S. H., Tsitsianis, N., Triantafylli, A., & Haslam, C. (2023). An empirical evaluation of the impact of agency conflicts on the association between corporate governance and firm financial performance. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(2), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-09-2021-0247
  22. Krauß, P., Pronobis, P., & Zülch, H. (2015). Abnormal audit fees and audit quality: initial evidence from the German audit market. Journal of Business Economics, 85(1), 45–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0709-5
  23. Kuo, N.-T., Li, S., & Jin, Z. (2023). Social trust and the demand for audit quality. Research in International Business and Finance, 65, 101931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.101931
  24. Kyriakou, M. I. (2022). The effect of the financial crisis on audit quality: European evidence. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 30(1), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-07-2021-0135
  25. Li, X., & Liu, M. (2024). Abnormal audit fees and financial reporting quality: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 55, 100622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100622
  26. Liu, S., Sulaiman, N. A., & Shahimi, S. (2024). The effects of situational and dispositional factors on audit quality threatening behaviour: exploring the moderating influence of religiosity. Asian Review of Accounting, 32(4), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-11-2022-0274
  27. MohammadRezaei, F., Faraji, O., Rezaee, Z., Gholami-Jamkarani, R., & Yari, M. (2024). Substantive or symbolic compliance with regulation, audit fees and audit quality. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 21(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-023-00178-4
  28. Saleh Aly, S. A., Diab, A., & Abdelazim, S. I. (2023). Audit quality, firm value and audit fees: does audit tenure matter? Egyptian evidence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2023-0203
  29. Salehi, M., Fakhri Mahmoudi, M. R., & Daemi Gah, A. (2019). A meta-analysis approach for determinants of effective factors on audit quality. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2018-0025
  30. Salehi, M., Komeili, F., & Daemi Gah, A. (2019). The impact of financial crisis on audit quality and audit fee stickiness: evidence from Iran. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 17(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-04-2017-0025
  31. Shailer, G. (2020). Ethics in the Independent Audits of Financial Statements BT - Handbook on Ethics in Finance (L. San-Jose, J. L. Retolaza, & L. van Liedekerke (eds.); pp. 1–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00001-1_19-1
  32. Simamora, R. A., & Hendarjatno, H. (2019). The effects of audit client tenure, audit lag, opinion shopping, liquidity ratio, and leverage to the going concern audit opinion. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-05-2019-0038
  33. Su, K., & Huang, H. J. (2024). Do auditors value social trust? Evidence from China. Applied Economics, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2325374
  34. Sulaiman, N. A. (2023). External audit quality: its meaning, representations and potential conflict in practice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(5), 1417–1440. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2020-4443
  35. Velte, P. (2023). The impact of external auditors on firms’ financial restatements: a review of archival studies and implications for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 73(3), 959–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00264-x
  36. Wahyuni, W., Sueny, L. N. R., Wahyu, A. S., & Fadewa, N. N. (2024). Examining Audit Fee Determinants and Their Impact on Audit Quality. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 2(3), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v2i3.373
  37. Widmann, M., Follert, F., & Wolz, M. (2021). What is it going to cost? Empirical evidence from a systematic literature review of audit fee determinants. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 455–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00190-w