Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 67 Download : 61

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review investigates the complex relationship between environmental policies and corporate strategies, aiming to understand their mechanisms and impacts. The goal is to comprehensively analyze existing literature to determine how environmental policies shape firms' strategic behaviors and organizational outcomes.


Research Design and Methodology: Employing a systematic approach, this study synthesizes diverse sources and disciplines to identify key drivers and barriers influencing firms' responses to environmental policies. Quantitative and qualitative methodologies are integrated to explore the dynamic relationship between regulatory compliance and corporate strategies.


Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal that regulatory compliance drives innovation in firms, advancing sustainability practices and competitive advantage. Additionally, integrating environmental considerations into corporate governance enhances resilience and promotes a culture of sustainability. The discussion highlights the positive impact of regulatory-induced innovation on firms' strategic behaviors while acknowledging the challenges of regulatory complexities and financial constraints.


Implications: The implications underscore the importance of proactive environmental management in navigating regulatory complexities and positioning firms for long-term success. This study contributes to advancing theoretical understanding and guiding managerial practice in fostering sustainable business practices and environmental stewardship within the corporate sector.


Novelty: This article lies in its holistic and multidisciplinary approach, introducing a new conceptual framework that provides practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners in promoting sustainable business practices.

Keywords

Environmental Policies Corporate Strategies Regulatory Compliance Innovation Dynamics Sustainable Business Practices

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Wahyuni, W., Hazizah, M. T., Ramadhani, A., & Ahmad, A. (2024). The Impact of Environmental Policies on Corporate Strategies: A Systematic Review. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 2(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v2i3.353
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abd Aziz, N. H., Latif, A. R. A., Osman, M. N. H., & Alshdaifat, S. (2023). ESG And Corporate Governance: Systematic. https://doi.org/10.35631/aijbes.518018
  2. Aldieri, L., Carlucci, F., Vinci, C. P., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2019). Environmental innovation, knowledge spillovers and policy implications: A systematic review of the economic effects literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 239, 118051. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118051
  3. Allee, K. D., Baik, B., Han, S.-Y., & Kim, B. H. (2019). Trust and Disclosure Transparency in Financial Reporting of Government Agencies. Available at SSRN 3444477. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3444477
  4. Almada, L., & Borges, R. (2018). Sustainable competitive advantage needs green human resource practices: A framework for environmental management. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(3), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2018170345
  5. Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Yadav, A. (2022). Do firms with environmental concerns give better performance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2322. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2322
  6. Barbarossa, C., & Pastore, A. (2015). Why environmentally conscious consumers do not purchase green products. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 18(2), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2012-0030
  7. Calof, J., Arcos, R., & Sewdass, N. (2020). Competitive intelligence practices of European firms. In Corporate Foresight and Innovation Management (pp. 34–47). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1337890
  8. Chin, T. L., Yean, T. F., & Leow, H.-W. (2023). Ability, motivation, opportunity-enhancing HRM practices and corporate environmental citizenship: Revisiting the moderating role of organisational learning capability in Malaysian construction companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 24(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.5607.2023
  9. da Silva, A. W. L., Netto, M., Selig, P. M., & de Ávila Lerípio, A. (2019). A framework for governance of sustainability indicator systems in strategic environmental assessment processes. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 21(01), 1950007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333219500078
  10. Dasinapa, M. B. (2023). Analyzing the Impact of Long-Term Financing on Cement Companies’ Profitability in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 1(2 SE-Articles), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v1i2.117
  11. Falcone, P. M. (2014). Environmental Standards and Firms’ Competitiveness: A Theoretical Analysis. Theoretical Economics Letters, 4(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.4236/TEL.2014.41017
  12. Fanelli, R. M. (2021). Barriers to adopting new technologies within rural small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Social Sciences, 10(11), 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOCSCI10110430
  13. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021). Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4237–4257. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2867
  14. Hou, B., Hong, J., Chen, Q., Shi, X., & Zhou, Y. (2019). Do academia-industry R&D collaborations necessarily facilitate industrial innovation in China? The role of technology transfer institutions. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(5), 717–746. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2018-0195
  15. Kenç, T., Erdem, F. P., & Ünalmış, İ. (2016). Resilience of emerging market economies to global financial conditions. Central Bank Review, 16(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2016.03.002
  16. Kim, S. S., Pak, J., & Son, S. Y. (2023). Do calling-oriented employees take charge in organizations? The role of supervisor close monitoring, intrinsic motivation, and organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 140, 103812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103812
  17. Lee, H.-K. (2014). Effects of authentic leadership on organizational commitment for employees. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(5), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.5.181
  18. Lemos, F. (2020). Emerging Market Multinational Companies (EMNCs): Challenges and Opportunities. SciELO Brasil. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020200307
  19. Lu, H., Shin, J.-E., & Zhang, M. (2023). Financial reporting and disclosure practices in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 76(1), 101598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101598
  20. Ludwig, P., & Sassen, R. (2022). Which internal corporate governance mechanisms drive corporate sustainability? Journal of Environmental Management, 301, 113780. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2021.113780
  21. Manginte, S. Y. (2024). Fortifying Transparency: Enhancing Corporate Governance through Robust Internal Control Mechanisms. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 2(2 SE-Articles), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v2i2.173
  22. Mendoza, J. P., Dekker, H. C., & Wielhouwer, J. L. (2016). Firms’ compliance with complex regulations. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 721. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2037769
  23. Moradi, E., Jafari, S. M., Doorbash, Z. M., & Mirzaei, A. (2021). Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(4), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APMRV.2021.01.003
  24. Nguyen, H. L., & Kanbach, D. K. (2024). Toward a view of integrating corporate sustainability into strategy: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(2), 962–976. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2611
  25. Nižetić, S., Djilali, N., Papadopoulos, A., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2019). Smart technologies for promotion of energy efficiency, utilization of sustainable resources and waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 565–591. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.397
  26. Nkemkiafu, A. G., Asah, N. P., & Felix, N. (2019). Strategic Process Innovation Practices On Customer Satisfaction And Market Share. Journal of Marketing Development & Competitiveness, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/JMDC.V13I2.2008
  27. Pasla, B. N., Ayu, M. S., Fathiyah, F., Bailah, B., Rasid, F., & Ubaidillah, U. (2022). Leadership style types: The Importance of Organizational Culture and Change Management. Jurnal Prajaiswara, 3(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.55351/prajaiswara.v3i2.45
  28. Permata, I. (2023). Insights into Effective Corporate Financial Management Practices and Their Implications. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 1(3 SE-Articles), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v1i3.194
  29. Pham, H. N., Thai, N. T., Heffernan, T. W., & Reynolds, N. (2024). Environmental Policies and the Promotion of Pro-Environmental Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Macromarketing, 44(1), 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467231201507
  30. Purwanti, D. (2023). The Strategic Imperative of Treasury and Financial Risk Management in a Volatile Economic Landscape. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 1(3 SE-Articles), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v1i3.224
  31. Ranjith, V. K. (2016). Business Models and Competitive Advantage. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 203–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30114-9
  32. Roy, A., & Pal, A. M. (2017). Corporate governance compliance, governance structures, and firm performance. Governance Structures, and Firm Performance (June 16, 2017). https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2988073
  33. Roy, R. (2018). Consumer product design: Patterns of innovation, market success and sustainability. Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, 3(5), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.18775/JIBRM.1849-8558.2015.35.3004
  34. Shoeb, M., Aslam, A., & Aslam, A. (2022). Environmental accounting disclosure practices: A bibliometric and systematic review. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(4), 226–239. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13085
  35. Stevanović, A. G. (2017). Organizational culture and climate as the requirements of innovation in organizations. Škola Biznisa, 2, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.5937/SKOLBIZ2-14066
  36. Swink, M., & Schoenherr, T. (2015). The effects of cross‐functional integration on profitability, process efficiency, and asset productivity. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12070
  37. Syahrani, N. A., Amiruddin, Saleh, M., & Razak, R. (2013). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Dan Time Budget Pressure Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 6(1), 13–26.
  38. Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020). Developing successful environmental decision support systems: Challenges and best practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, 110513. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2020.110513
  39. Zhao, H. (2018). Executive labor market segmentation: How local market density affects incentives and performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2593234
  40. Zhao, S., Teng, L., & Ji, J. (2024). Impact of environmental regulations on eco-innovation: the moderating role of top managers’ environmental awareness and commitment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(10), 2229–2256.