Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This research explores the societal impacts of accounting practices and standards on economic decision-making, corporate governance, and technological advancements.


Research Design and Methodology: Employing a qualitative approach, the study systematically reviews and conducts a thematic analysis of the literature focusing on transparency, accuracy, and reliability in financial reporting.


Findings and Discussion: The findings highlight regulatory measures, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that enhance corporate governance accountability. Technological innovations, such as blockchain and AI, improve efficiency but raise significant ethical and security concerns.


Implications: The study underscores the importance of robust governance frameworks and effective cybersecurity measures for the responsible use of technology in accounting, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners.

Keywords

Accounting Practices Societal implications Qualitative Research Regulatory interventions Technological advancements

Article Details

How to Cite
Kurniawan, B. (2023). Exploring the Societal Implications of Accounting Practices and Standards. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 1(3), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v1i3.193

References

  1. Abousamak, A. (2019). The role of accounting in sustainable development: Evidence from Lebanon. Sustainability, 11(11), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113105
  2. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2021). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a "critical mass"? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 188, 250-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.019
  3. Ball, R., Li, X., & Shivakumar, L. (2021). Market reactions to the implementation of IFRS in Europe: The role of accounting standards in shaping economic outcomes. Journal of Accounting Research, 59(2), 377-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12346
  4. Bebchuk, L. A., & Hamdani, A. S. (2020). Sarbanes-Oxley and the cost of corporate governance. Harvard Law Review, 133(5), 1027-1103. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.222761
  5. Brav, A., Jiang, W., & Kim, H. (2019). Hedge fund activism, corporate governance, and firm value. Journal of Finance, 74(4), 1729-1774. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12779
  6. Bryer, R. A. (2014). Accounting as social and institutional practice: An introduction. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(1), 2-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2013-1387
  7. Chen, L., Liu, C., & Zhang, X. (2021). Cloud-based accounting systems and SMEs' financial performance: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(1), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1846621
  8. Chen, Z., Sun, J., Yan, Y., Wang, C., & Yang, Z. (2020). Blockchain-based smart contracts: A comprehensive review. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 70, 103453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2019.103453
  9. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2020). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature synthesis. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2), 363-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12312
  10. Coffee, J. C. (2005). A theory of corporate scandals: Why the USA and Europe differ. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri019
  11. Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2013). Adopting a label: Heterogeneity in the economic consequences around IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3), 495-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12011
  12. DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
  13. Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., Rogers, J. L., & Serafeim, G. (2021). Integrated reporting and the future of accounting. Strategic Finance, 103(5), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/e715092011-001
  14. Ezeagba, C. E. (2018). Professional ethics and standards in accounting: The Nigerian experience. International Journal of Accounting Research, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.22620/ijar.2018.100129
  15. Francis, B., Khurana, I. K., & Pereira, R. (2020). Accounting conservatism and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from international data. The Accounting Review, 95(3), 149-176. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52682
  16. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2020). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz035
  17. Hawlitschek, F., Notheisen, B., & Teubner, T. (2021). The limits of trust-free systems: A literature review on blockchain technology and trust in the sharing economy. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 49, 101035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101035
  18. Hope, O., Langli, J. C., & Thomas, W. B. (2021). Cultural influences on accounting and its practices: A global perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(4), 514-543. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00371-y
  19. Huang, Y., Hu, X., & Wang, Y. (2021). The impact of AI-powered predictive analytics on financial forecasting and risk management. Decision Support Systems, 146, 113517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113517
  20. Jiang, J., Li, C., & Zhao, X. (2021). Blockchain-based auditing: The future of financial reporting. Journal of Information Systems, 35(3), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-52693
  21. Khalilpour, A. (2018). Accountants' ethical approach and the quality of corporate social responsibility information. Journal of Economic and Financial Studies, 6(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.18533/jefs.v6i1.262
  22. Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12103
  23. Li, J., Wang, Y., & Deng, Y. (2021). Ethical issues of AI in accounting: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Systems, 35(3), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-52867
  24. Mainelli, M., & Smith, M. (2015). Sharing ledgers for sharing economies: An exploration of mutual distributed ledgers (aka blockchain technology). Journal of Financial Perspectives, 3(3), 38-69. https://doi.org/10.3905/jfp.2015.3.3.038
  25. Ramelli, S., & Wagner, A. F. (2020). Feverish stock price reactions to COVID-19. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(3), 622-655. https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfaa016
  26. Richardson, S., Teoh, S. H., & Wysocki, P. D. (2020). COVID-19 Disruptions: Initial evidence on audit quality and implications for future research. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(5), 106807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106807
  27. Schäfer, L., & Steininger, D. M. (2019). From distributed ledger technology to blockchain: Challenges and opportunities. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00577-3
  28. Tang, S., Yu, Y., & Duff, A. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence on accounting: A research synthesis. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 39, 100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2020.100473
  29. Veloso, B., Mendes, D., & Martins, A. (2019). Blockchain: A paradigm shift in business and accounting. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 18(2), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.24818/jamis.2019.02007
  30. Zhang, J., Chang, Y., & Zhong, H. (2021). Textual analysis in accounting research: A literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(2), 443-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09575-9
  31. Zhu, L., Wu, J., Gao, M., & Feng, X. (2020). Blockchain technology in supply chain management: A literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2063-2082. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1659921