Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 305 Download : 216

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore the relationship between business strategy and shareholder value maximization, focusing on the mechanisms that drive value creation and sustainability in the global marketplace. It seeks to integrate various theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence to enhance understanding in this area.


Research Design and Methodology: The thematic analysis and narrative synthesis reveal key themes and theories that contribute to understanding the formulation of business strategy and its impact on shareholder wealth. The findings emphasize the importance of strategic consistency, resource endowments, and stakeholder engagement as key drivers of financial performance and value creation.


Findings and Discussion: The study highlights the need for further research to adapt to emerging trends and practical challenges in strategic management and corporate governance. It contributes to ongoing discussions in the field, providing valuable insights for scholars, practitioners, and organizational leaders, and highlights the practical implications of effectively implementing business strategies to maximize shareholder value.


Implications: The study emphasizes the importance of continuous adaptation and innovation in accounting practices for effectively navigating evolving business environments. Moreover, technological advancements, globalization, and regulatory reforms have a significant impact on accounting practices and organizational dynamics, presenting both opportunities and challenges.

Keywords

Business Strategy Shareholder Value Dynamic Capabilities Stakeholder Governance Literature Review

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mulyani, Y. (2023). Unraveling the Relationship between Business Strategy and Shareholder Value Maximization. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 1(3), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v1i3.212
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2001). Internet business models and strategies: Text and cases. McGraw-Hill Education.
  2. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363
  3. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  4. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  5. Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Harvard Business Press.
  6. Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q. Management Science, 45(7), 1008-1024. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.7.1008
  7. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  8. Chen, Y. S., & Wang, Y. H. (2020). Intellectual capital and organizational performance: The role of innovation capability. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(4), 559-578. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2020-0061
  9. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.
  10. Chesbrough, H. W., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529-555. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.3.529
  11. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
  12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  13. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
  14. Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), 1120-1171.
  15. Eisenhardt, K. M. (2022). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 43(2), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3315
  16. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106-116.
  18. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. Yale University Press.
  20. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 33(13), 122-126.
  21. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business Press.
  22. Gupta, A. K. (2013). The rise and fall of strategic planning: Reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. Journal of Business Strategy, 34(5), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-07-2013-0064
  23. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026
  24. Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2021). Competing in the age of AI. Harvard Business Press.
  25. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280021
  26. Helfat, C. E. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Wiley.
  27. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  28. Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893928
  29. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  30. Lazonick, W. (2000). The new economy business model and sustainable shareholder value. Organization Environment, 13(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026600132003
  31. Lazonick, W., & O'Sullivan, M. (2019). Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 48(3), 366-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1597744
  32. Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 92-102.
  33. Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130505
  34. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
  35. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166440
  36. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
  37. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
  38. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
  39. Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120302
  40. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  41. Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8-37. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54
  42. Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.001
  43. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  44. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  45. Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W. W. Norton & Company.
  46. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
  47. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780