Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to provide a comprehensive examination of financial statement audits and assurance practices by enriching the understanding of key concepts, methodologies, and empirical findings in this field.


Research Method: This research employed a qualitative literature review method. The study systematically analyzed scholarly works, theoretical frameworks, and empirical studies related to financial statement audits and assurance practices. The research process involved identifying relevant literature sources, collecting data, analyzing findings, and synthesizing recurring themes, empirical trends, and gaps in the existing literature.


Results and Discussion: The findings highlight the importance of auditor independence, professional skepticism, and robust audit procedures in ensuring audit quality and the integrity of financial reporting. The study also shows that corporate governance mechanisms, regulatory reforms, and technological advancements play an important role in shaping audit practices.


Implications: The findings emphasize the need for continuous professional development, stronger regulatory oversight, and investment in technological capabilities to improve audit quality, effectiveness, and relevance in a rapidly changing business environment. Future research is recommended further to examine emerging issues in audit and assurance practices.


Originality: This study offers an integrated literature-based perspective on financial statement audits and assurance practices by synthesizing key concepts, empirical trends, and research gaps in the field.

Keywords

financial statement audits assurance practices auditor independence corporate governance technological advancements

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ramlah, R. (2026). Insights into Financial Statement Audits and Assurance Practices. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 4(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v4i2.861
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
  2. Baker, C. R., & Hayes, M. R. (2013). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 32, 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2013.07.002
  3. Baker, C. R., Palmrose, Z. V., & Ryan, S. G. (2013). The implications of legal and financial reporting environments for large audit firm networks: Insights from post-SOX Europe. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(5), 1035–1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12023
  4. Boginskaya, O. A. (2021). Conceptual framework of the audit of the reliability of accounting (financial) statements. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(2).2021.15
  5. Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit committee composition and interaction with internal auditing: Canadian evidence. International Journal of Auditing, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2004.00183.x
  6. Carcello, J. V., & Nagy, A. L. (2004). Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.55
  7. Cohen, J. R., Krishnan, G. V., & Wright, A. M. (2023). Detecting financial statement fraud: A review of audit and non-audit-based approaches. Journal of Accounting Literature, 42, 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2023.04.001
  8. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor independence, "low-balling", and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90021-5
  9. DeFond, M. L., & Lennox, C. S. (2024). The effect of audit firm tenure on audit quality and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(3), 621–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12417
  10. DeZoort, F. T., & Harrison, P. D. (2022). The impact of audit committee effectiveness on auditor behavior and financial reporting quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(1), 196–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12705
  11. Grant Thornton. (2023). The evolving role of assurance: Balancing tradition with transformation. Retrieved from https://www.grantthornton.com
  12. Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley Jr, R. A., & Velury, U. K. (2008). Financial statement fraud: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.231
  13. KPMG. (2023). Data analytics in auditing: A strategic approach to unlocking value. Retrieved from https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home.html
  14. Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2005.24.1.103
  15. Lennox, C. S., & Pittman, J. A. (2024). Regulatory reforms and audit quality: Evidence from EU markets. The Accounting Review, 99(2), 789–816. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52513
  16. O'Dwyer, B. (2005). Commentary on "Social and environmental accounting education in Australian universities". Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 25(2), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2005.9651729
  17. Owen, D. L. (2004). Regulatory dialogues: Assessing the effects of environmental disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19(2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0401900205
  18. PwC. (2023). Audit in a post-pandemic world: Navigating uncertainty with agility and resilience. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com
  19. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937
  20. Simunic, D. A. (2023). Auditor independence and audit quality: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 41, 27–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2023.01.001
  21. Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2022). ESG integration: The value proposition for investors and the role of assurance. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04971-1
  22. Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2022). Integrated reporting and internal audit: Insights from practice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(1), 140–170.
  23. Trotman, K. T., & Trompeter, G. M. (2022). Professional skepticism and audit judgment: A cognitive approach. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(3), 1401–1433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12641
  24. Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Halper, F. (2015). The continuous audit of online systems. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 2(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51241
  25. Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Halper, F. (2015). The continuous auditing imperative–Lessons from the continuous reporting of a national economy. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 12(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51240
  26. Vasarhelyi, M. A., & Kogan, A. (2024). Blockchain and audit: Transforming the future of assurance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-53924
  27. Venkatesh, K. (2012). Role of XBRL in financial reporting and assurance: A synthesis of research. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-50114