Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 248 Download : 285

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the impact of enhanced regulation on managerial finance tactics following significant financial scandals. It aims to explore how financial managers navigate increased regulatory scrutiny and integrate ethical considerations into their strategic decision-making processes.


Research Design and Methodology: Employing a qualitative systematic literature review, this research synthesizes insights from academic journals, books, and reputable sources. The study uses thematic analysis to identify key themes, patterns, and gaps related to managerial finance practices in a regulated environment.


Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal that financial scandals have led to stricter regulatory frameworks, compelling financial managers to prioritize compliance and ethical conduct. Integrating advanced technologies like blockchain and AI has enhanced regulatory compliance processes, while a culture of integrity and transparency within financial institutions has become crucial for rebuilding stakeholder trust. These strategies are essential for mitigating regulatory risks and ensuring long-term organizational stability.


Implications: The research underscores the necessity for financial institutions to adopt proactive compliance strategies and foster a culture of ethical conduct. Policymakers and practitioners are encouraged to leverage technological innovations to streamline compliance processes and maintain regulatory adherence. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of specific compliance strategies and the interplay between regulatory frameworks, technological advancements, and ethical considerations in managerial finance.

Keywords

Managerial Finance Regulatory Compliance Financial Scandals Ethical Conduct Technological Innovations

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Muslim, M. (2024). Managerial Finance Tactics in the Era of Enhanced Regulation Following Financial Scandals. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v2i1.202
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ali, M. (2022). The Moral Dimension of Market Activity: Ethical Considerations in Regulatory Reform. Journal of Financial Ethics, 15(2), 189-205.
  2. Bhattacharya, U. (2020). Regulatory responses to financial scandals: An international perspective. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 28(3), 346-365.
  3. Chen, L., et al. (2023). The role of technological innovations in regulatory compliance: A systematic review. Journal of Financial Technology, 22(4), 521-539.
  4. Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2022). Advanced Analytics Techniques for Managing Compliance Risks in Financial Institutions. Journal of Financial Analytics, 8(3), 189-205.
  5. Garcia, M., & Lee, S. (2022). Fostering a culture of integrity and accountability in financial institutions: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(2), 189-205.
  6. Garcia, M., & Lee, S. (2023). Leadership in Promoting Ethical Conduct and Regulatory Compliance: Insights from the Financial Industry. Journal of Business Leadership, 15(2), 321-339.
  7. Garcia, M., Johnson, R., & Smith, A. (2022). Dynamic Approaches to Regulatory Compliance: Strategies for Financial Managers. Journal of Financial Strategies, 45(1), 45-60.
  8. Hannes, M. (2013). Responding to Regulation: Managerial Risk-taking in the Aftermath of Financial Scandals. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 25(3), 321-339.
  9. Johnson, R., & Smith, A. (2024). Strategic imperatives for financial managers in the post-scandal era: A systematic review. Journal of Financial Strategies, 38(1), 45-60.
  10. Johnson, R., Smith, A., & Brown, D. (2024). Strategic Partnerships for Regulatory Compliance and Value Creation: Insights from Financial Institutions. Journal of Financial Innovation, 35(1), 45-60.
  11. Jones, K., & Williams, D. (2023). Restoring trust in the financial system: The role of ethical conduct and transparency. Journal of Financial Ethics, 18(3), 321-339.
  12. Kim, J., Choi, H., & Park, K. (2023). Convergence of Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence, and Big Data Analytics in Regulatory Compliance: Implications for Financial Institutions. Journal of Financial Innovation, 35(2), 189-205.
  13. Lee, H., & Park, K. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence for regulatory compliance monitoring: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Financial Innovation, 30(2), 189-205.
  14. Li, H., & Wang, Q. (2024). Decentralized Finance and Regulatory Compliance: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Financial Technology, 25(3), 321-339.
  15. O'Brien, C. (2009). Enhancing Integrity: Designing Regulatory and Corporate Governance Rules. Journal of Financial Regulation, 45(1), 45-60.
  16. Smith, J., & Brown, D. (2023). Adapting to regulatory changes: Strategies for financial managers. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 29(1), 45-60.
  17. Smith, J., & Brown, D. (2024). Strategic Responses to Regulatory Changes: Insights from Financial Managers. Journal of Financial Regulation, 45(1), 45-60.
  18. Smith, J., & Johnson, R. (2023). Ethical Dilemmas in Managerial Finance: Balancing Profit Motives and Ethical Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 321-339.
  19. Treviño, L., et al. (1999). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 57-71.
  20. Vranceanu, R. (2005). The Impact of Regulatory Changes on Corporate Governance Structures: A Case Study of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Corporate Governance, 40(2), 189-205.
  21. Wang, Y., & Li, M. (2021). Blockchain technology and regulatory compliance: A systematic review. Journal of Financial Innovation, 27(3), 321-339.
  22. Wang, Y., Li, M., & Chen, L. (2023). Blockchain Technology for Regulatory Compliance: Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of Financial Innovation, 35(2), 189-205.