Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 235 Download : 155

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to explore the integration of corporate governance practices into new financing projects and executive pay structures, highlighting their impact on organizational performance, transparency, and stakeholder trust. It addresses the growing need for robust governance mechanisms to align executive incentives with long-term value creation and effective decision-making in financing projects.


Research Design and Methodology: A quantitative descriptive research design was employed, utilizing survey instruments, statistical analysis, and regression modeling to examine the integration of governance practices across diverse corporations. The study focused on the prevalence, determinants, and outcomes of governance integration in financing projects and executive compensation structures.


Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal that robust corporate governance mechanisms significantly influence firms' financing decisions and executive compensation structures. Effective governance practices enhance transparency, accountability, and risk management, leading to lower financing costs, greater investor confidence, and improved project outcomes. The study also highlights the role of performance-based executive compensation schemes in aligning executive incentives with shareholder interests, fostering long-term value creation.


Implications: The research underscores the importance of integrating corporate governance practices into financing and compensation frameworks to enhance organizational performance and stakeholder trust. It offers practical insights for policymakers, practitioners, and scholars on developing governance mechanisms that ensure prudent decision-making and value optimization. The findings advocate for continuous improvement in governance practices to meet evolving regulatory, shareholder, and societal expectations.

Keywords

Corporate Governance Executive Compensation Financing Projects Transparency Stakeholder Trust

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Dewi, M. S. (2023). Integrating Corporate Governance Practices into New Financing Projects and Executive Pay Structures. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 1(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v1i3.237
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
  2. Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2004). Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674043468
  3. Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006
  4. Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith, C. W. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1–2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90018-1
  5. Chen, H., & Wu, H. (2021). Board Diversity and Corporate Risk Management: Evidence from Board Gender Diversity. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 67, 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101692
  6. Chen, X., Hu, M., & Liu, X. (2021). The impact of industry competition on corporate governance: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. International Review of Financial Analysis, 76, 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101804
  7. Chen, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Independent directors, compensation committees, and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101896
  8. Chen, Z., Sun, Q., & Wang, Z. (2024). The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria on Corporate Financing Decisions: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05113-5
  9. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (2003). Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.299
  10. Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177. https://doi.org/10.1086/261354
  11. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate Governance and Equity Prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–155. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
  12. Gordon, J. (2010). Convertible Equity-Based Pay: Avoiding a Governance Problem. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 661–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0266-1
  13. He, J. (2004). CEO Compensation and Firm Performance in High Technology Firms: A Study of the Role of Managerial Discretion. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31(3‐4), 547–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2004.00575.x
  14. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00066
  15. Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. European Financial Management, 7(3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00163
  16. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  17. Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/261712
  18. Johnson, D., Li, X., & Wang, H. (2023). Shareholder Activism and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Voting Outcomes. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 101933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101933
  19. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Investor Protection and Corporate Governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9
  20. Lee, J. (2013). Corporate Governance, Managerial Power and Agency Theory. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(3), 733–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9181-6
  21. Li, C., & Chen, Z. (2022). Ownership structure and corporate governance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. China Economic Review, 73, 101669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101669
  22. Li, J., & Tang, L. (2021). Board Independence, Board Diversity, and Corporate Financing Decisions: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101878
  23. Li, W., & Wang, H. (2022). Corporate Governance and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 75, 101956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.101956
  24. Li, X., & Wu, J. (2023). Governance Transparency and Firm Financing: Evidence from the Debt Market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 73, 101958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.101958
  25. Liu, S., & Wei, Z. (2021). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria and Firm Performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05042-4
  26. Liu, X., Shi, J., & Wei, Z. (2024). Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, and Firm Financing Decisions: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 70, 101874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101874
  27. Murphy, K. J. (1999). Executive Compensation. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3, 2485–2563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03006-1
  28. Pukthuanthong, K. (2003). Executive Compensation in High Technology Firms: A Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30(5‐6), 647–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00062
  29. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
  30. Wang, H., & Li, X. (2022). Long-term Performance Metrics in Executive Compensation and Firm Financing Decisions: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 101938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101938
  31. Wang, Y., Shen, J., & Chen, Z. (2022). CEO Compensation and Corporate Financing Decisions: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 75, 101971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.101971
  32. Wang, Z., Liu, X., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Executive Compensation and Firm Financing Decisions: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 73, 101959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.101959
  33. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
  34. Zhang, J., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria and Firm Financing Decisions: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 70, 101886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101886
  35. Zhang, M., Li, X., & Chen, Z. (2024). Governance Integration and Firm Financing Decisions: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 75, 101952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.101952