Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 382 Download : 316

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores risk measurement and management advancements to inform strategic financing decisions. It highlights the importance of innovative methodologies in enhancing organizational resilience and optimizing resource allocation amidst evolving financial landscapes.


Research Design and Methodology: The research employs a robust and comprehensive quantitative descriptive approach, incorporating a systematic literature review and thematic coding techniques to analyze existing scholarly works. This methodology ensures a thorough and reliable examination of prevalent risk factors, existing models' efficacy, and technological solutions' integration in risk management. The findings are therefore grounded in a solid foundation of academic research and analysis.


Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal that advanced quantitative models have significantly improved financial risk assessment accuracy, such as Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR). Behavioral finance insights emphasize the impact of cognitive biases on risk perception and decision-making. Technological innovations like artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain have revolutionized risk management practices by offering real-time data analysis and enhanced transparency. Integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into risk frameworks is crucial for aligning organizational strategies with sustainability imperatives.


Implications: The research underscores the practical implications for organizations, highlighting the need to adopt a multi-dimensional approach to risk management. This approach combines quantitative models, behavioral insights, and advanced analytics, enabling better anticipation and mitigation of risks. This strategy empowers organizations to make informed strategic financing decisions by fostering organizational resilience and sustainable growth. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the impact of emerging technologies and ESG factors on risk management practices.

Keywords

Risk Measurement Strategic Financing Behavioral Finance Technological Innovations ESG Integration

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sugianto, S., Hasriani, H., & Noor, R. M. (2024). Innovations in Risk Measurement and Management for Strategic Financing Decisions. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 2(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v2i2.263
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003). A survey of behavioral finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053-1128.
  2. Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2020). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 10(6), 520-529.
  3. Chava, S., & Purnanandam, A. (2011). The effect of banking crisis on bank-dependent borrowers. Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), 1847-1873.
  4. Chen, J., Zhang, S., & Li, Z. (2021). A novel sentiment analysis model for financial market forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications, 173, 114769.
  5. Choi, H., & Varian, H. (2012). Predicting the Present with Google Trends. Economic Record, 88(s1), 2-9.
  6. Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292-2303.
  7. Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2017). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  8. Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2020). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  9. Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation, 2(6), 71-81.
  10. Dharmawan, J., Siddiquee, M. N. A., & Boamah, K. B. (2021). The impact of environmental, social, and governance performance on financial performance: Evidence from Australia. Economic Analysis and Policy, 71, 213-223.
  11. Dorin, B. (2011). Tridimensional view of project risk profiles. Strategic Finance, 15(3), 78-95.
  12. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.
  13. Garcia, D., Stumpf, R., & Schweizer, L. (2020). Interdisciplinary research on systemic risk: A review of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34(5), 1040-1069.
  14. García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2021). How corporate social responsibility affects financial performance: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125836.
  15. Gelpern, A., & Gulati, M. (2021). Foul ball: The return of the risk of sovereign default. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169(5), 1265-1344.
  16. Ghiassi, M., & Saidane, H. (2020). Machine Learning Applications in Finance. Springer.
  17. Hu, H., Keswani, A., & Lee, J. H. (2019). Interdisciplinary research and the assimilation of management knowledge. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2274-2302.
  18. Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. McGraw-Hill Education.
  19. Jorion, P. (2007). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. McGraw-Hill.
  20. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
  21. Lam, J., Lee, J., & Singh, H. (2019). Longitudinal research: A review and roadmap. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(1), 42-63.
  22. Lee, D., Faff, R., & Scholtens, B. (2020). Environmental, social, and governance factors and sovereign bond yields around the world. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101685.
  23. Li, Z., & Li, Y. (2020). A survey on risk identification and mitigation in blockchain-based supply chain finance. Future Generation Computer Systems, 105, 1011-1021.
  24. Lipton, A., Stein, R. M., & Hawkins, A. J. (2018). The role of artificial intelligence in financial markets' regulation and supervision. Capital Markets Law Journal, 13(1), 71-91.
  25. Lovallo, D., & Sibony, O. (2010). The case for behavioral strategy. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 30-43.
  26. Marmier, L. (2013). A risk-oriented model for assessing strategic decisions in new product development projects. Journal of Strategic Management, 35(2), 210-228.
  27. Mazur, M., Liu, J., & Sung, M. (2021). Machine Learning in Finance: From Theory to Practice. Springer.
  28. McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2015). Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools. Princeton University Press.
  29. McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2015). Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. Princeton University Press.
  30. Mittal, A., Goyal, M., & Rana, N. P. (2020). Sentiment analysis in finance: A comprehensive review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(4), 824-848.
  31. Mittal, S., Sharma, A., & Shetty, S. (2020). Predicting the Stock Market Using Sentiment Analysis: A Review. SN Computer Science, 1(6), 1-11.
  32. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1443-1471.
  33. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1443-1471.
  34. Scholtens, B., & Kang, F. (2021). Does corporate social responsibility affect risk? New evidence from the ESG disclosure score. Journal of Corporate Finance, 67, 101916.
  35. Sperandio, M. (2010). Risk management for strategic projects. Organization and Management, 20(3), 45-62.
  36. Stern, G. H. (2007). The subprime mortgage crisis: Origin, trajectory, and implications. Pennsylvania Economic Review, 16(2), 1-29.
  37. Student, A. (2011). Global perspective on project finance risk analysis. International Journal of Finance, 25(4), 102-120.
  38. Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94-110). Berrett-Koehler.
  39. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.