Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 42 Download : 23

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the role of public budget transparency and accountability in preventing corruption and inefficiency. It investigates how governance mechanisms and digital tools, such as e-governance and e-procurement systems, affect public trust in government institutions.


Research Method: The study employs a systematic literature review, analyzing secondary data from various sources to examine the effectiveness of transparency and accountability across regions. The research focuses on regional differences between developed and developing countries and identifies critical factors such as institutional strength and citizen participation.


Results and Discussion: The findings show that transparency mechanisms, particularly those supported by digital technologies, significantly reduce financial reporting errors and enhance public trust. However, transparency alone is not practical in regions with weak governance structures. Successful implementation requires strong accountability measures and active public involvement.


Implications: The study suggests governments should combine digital tools with institutional reforms to ensure adequate public oversight and participation. Public administrators and policymakers must develop governance frameworks that encourage transparency and accountability. Future research should examine the influence of political, cultural, and social factors on the success of transparency initiatives.

Keywords

Public budget transparency accountability e-governance corruption prevention financial reporting

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sari, R., & Muslim, M. (2025). Public Budget Transparency and Accountability in Preventing Corruption and Inefficiency. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v4i1.467
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. AbdulKareem, A. K., & Oladimeji, K. A. (2024). Cultivating the digital citizen: trust, digital literacy and e-government adoption. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(2), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2023-0196
  2. Aguerre, C., & Bonina, C. (2024). Open government, civic tech, and digital platforms in Latin America: A governance study of Montevideo’s urban app ‘Por Mi Barrio.’ Information Systems Journal, 34(4), 1037–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12468
  3. Aikins, S. K. (2011). An examination of government internal audits’ role in improving financial performance. Public Finance and Management, 11(4), 306–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/152397211101100
  4. Ali, M. (2023). E-governance and E-democracy: a Digital Revolution. Available at SSRN 4623414. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4623414
  5. Alotaibi, N. A. M. (2021). Multi factors that affect the correct use of accounting information in a complex decision-making. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/11423
  6. Amalia, G. (2024). Enhancing Corporate Governance Through Rigorous and Insightful Auditing Processes. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v2i1.233
  7. Androniceanu, A. (2021). Transparency In Public Administration As A Challenge For A Good Democratic Governance. Revista Administratie Si Management Public, 2021(36), 149–164. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2021:y:2021:i:36:p:149-164
  8. Arkorful, V. E., Lugu, B. K., Hammond, A., & Basiru, I. (2021). Decentralization and Citizens’ Participation in Local Governance: Does Trust and Transparency Matter? – An Empirical Study. Forum for Development Studies, 48(2), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2021.1872698
  9. Assegaff, S. D. (2024). The Effect of Accountability, Competence, and Independence on Audit Quality. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 2(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v2i3.319
  10. Aulia, R. (2023). Enhancing Decision Making through Professional Judgment and Comprehensive Information Analyses. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(3), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i3.230
  11. Ball, R., Jayaraman, S., & Shivakumar, L. (2012). Audited financial reporting and voluntary disclosure as complements: A test of the Confirmation Hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1), 136–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.11.005
  12. Bastida, F., & Benito, B. (2007). Central government budget practices and transparency: An international comparison. Public Administration, 85(3), 667–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00664.x
  13. Bendickson, J., Muldoon, J., Liguori, E., & Davis, P. E. (2016). Agency theory: the times, they are a-changin’. Management Decision, 54(1), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2015-0058
  14. Berliner, D., & Erlich, A. (2015). Competing for transparency: Political competition and institutional reform in Mexican states. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000616
  15. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
  16. Bisogno, M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Santis, S. (2022). Do e-government initiatives and e-participation affect the level of budget transparency? International Public Management Journal, 25(3), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2042437
  17. Boufounou, P., Eriotis, N., Kounadeas, T., Argyropoulos, P., & Poulopoulos, J. (2024). Enhancing Internal Control Mechanisms in Local Government Organizations: A Crucial Step towards Mitigating Corruption and Ensuring Economic Development. Economies, 12(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12040078
  18. Branet, D.-S., & Hategan, C.-D. (2024). Bibliometric framing of research trends regarding public sector auditing to fight corruption and prevent fraud. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(3), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17030094
  19. Campos, J. E., & Pradhan, S. (2007). The many faces of corruption: tracking vulnerabilities at the sector level. World Bank Publications.
  20. Castro, C., & Lopes, I. C. (2023). E-Government as a Tool in Controlling Corruption. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(16), 1137–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2076695
  21. Chen, C., & Neshkova, M. I. (2020). The effect of fiscal transparency on corruption: A panel cross‐country analysis. Public Administration, 98(1), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12620
  22. Cook, A. (2017). Outcomes based approaches in public service reform. What Works Scotland Edinburgh.
  23. Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 512–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004
  24. Doig, A., & Riley, S. (1998). Corruption and anti-corruption strategies: Issues and case studies from developing countries. Corruption and Integrity Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries, 45(62), 45–62. https://www.academia.edu/download/30191602/chapter03.pdf.
  25. ElBerry, N. A., & Goeminne, S. (2021). Fiscal transparency, fiscal forecasting and budget credibility in developing countries. Journal of Forecasting, 40(1), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2695
  26. Erkkilä, T. (2020). Transparency in public administration. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1404
  27. Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955
  28. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Zyglidopoulos, S. (2018). Stakeholder theory: Concepts and strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108539500
  29. Fukuyama, F. (2017). State building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Profile Books.
  30. Gaol, L. L., Santoso, E. B., & Prasetyo, A. (2024). Penguatan Tata Kelola Keuangan Publik melalui Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Transparansi Informasi. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi Indonesia Padang, 4(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.31933/mwca7592
  31. Grindle, M. (2012). Good governance: The inflation of an idea. Planning Ideas That Matter, 259–282.
  32. Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less?: Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central Government. OUP Oxford.
  33. Ibrahimy, M. M., Virkus, S., & Norta, A. (2023). The role of e-government in reducing corruption and enhancing transparency in the Afghan public sector: a case study. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-10-2022-0135
  34. Ikhtiari, K. (2023). Best Practices and Innovations in Modern Financial Statement Audits. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(3), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i3.277
  35. Jeong, D., Shenoy, A., & Zimmermann, L. V. (2023). De Jure versus De Facto transparency: Corruption in local public office in India. Journal of Public Economics, 221, 104855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104855
  36. Kassem, R. (2022). Elucidating corporate governance’s impact and role in countering fraud. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(7), 1523–1546. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2021-0279
  37. Kohler, J. C., & Dimancesco, D. (2020). The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk. Global Health Action, 13(sup1), 1694745. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694745
  38. Kulmie, D. A., Mohamud, A. A., & Ibrahim, M. S. (2024). Good Governance, Public Service Delivery and Public Trust: Case of Banadir Regional Administration of Somalia. International Journal of Religion, 5(9), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.61707/1fzxbj65
  39. Laeeq Khan, M., Welser, H. T., Cisneros, C., Manatong, G., & Idris, I. K. (2020). Digital inequality in the Appalachian Ohio: Understanding how demographics, internet access, and skills can shape vital information use (VIU). Telematics and Informatics, 50, 101380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101380
  40. Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. “ O’Reilly Media, Inc.”
  41. Lonsdale, J., Wilkins, P., & Ling, T. (2011). Performance auditing: Contributing to accountability in democratic government. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  42. Mabillard, V., & Zumofen, R. (2021). Transparency and accountability—the case of public procurement practices in Switzerland. Public Works Management & Policy, 26(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X19898699
  43. Marklund, C. (2014). From Promise to Compromise: Nordic Openness in a World of Global Transparency. The Paradox of Openness: Transparency and Participation in Nordic Cultures of Consensus, 126, 237. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=fCaeBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA237&ots=jfsjnP5_Xn&sig=lJ9O5NWLJC6Z6OJDCGDKl4UPd2Q&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  44. Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533
  45. Mesioye, O., & Bakare, I. A. (2024). Evaluating Financial Reporting Quality: Metrics, Challenges, and Impact on Decision-Making. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(10), 1144–1156. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.1024.2735
  46. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press.
  47. Neupane, A., Soar, J., Vaidya, K., & Yong, J. (2012). Role of public e-procurement technology to reduce corruption in government procurement. Proceedings of the 5th International Public Procurement Conference (IPPC5). https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q17y5/role-of-public-e-procurement-technology-to-reduce-corruption-in-gov-procurement
  48. Nukpezah, J. A., Ntow, M., & Ahmadu, A. S. (2024). Democracy, Freedom, and Budget Transparency: A Multinational Analysis. Public Integrity, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2024.2347078
  49. O’Regan, B., King, R., & Smith, D. (2022). Combining accountability forms: transparency and “intelligent” accountability in a public service organization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(5), 1287–1315. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2020-4473
  50. Obasa, S. O. (2019). Good Governance, Accountability and Transparency for Sustainable Development in Africa. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance. http://onlineresearchjournals.com/ijopagg/art/307.pdf.
  51. Paranata, A. (2022). The miracle of anti-corruption efforts and regional fiscal independence in plugging budget leakage: evidence from western and eastern Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11153
  52. Peixoto, T., & Fox, J. (2016). When does ICT-enabled citizen voice lead to government responsiveness? https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.104
  53. Petrucelli, J. R., & Peters, J. R. (2016). Preventing fraud and mismanagement in government: Systems and structures. John Wiley & Sons.
  54. Polizzi, S., & Scannella, E. (2023). Continuous auditing in public sector and central banks: a framework to tackle implementation challenges. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 31(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-02-2022-0011
  55. Prakasa, S. U. W., Hariri, A., Haq, H. S., Arafah, A. R., & Sahid, M. M. (2023). Public Procurement Nexus Social for Mitigate the Corruption: Lesson from Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 7(2), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.72630
  56. Rakhmadani, N. P., & Suzana, S. (2025). Analysis of the Impact of Audit Fee Reduction on Audit Quality and Stakeholder Trust. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 3(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v3i1.452
  57. Rumkabu, F. M., Mutmainnah, M., & Pasolo, M. R. . (2024). Slack Resources, Audit Committee, Board Feminism on the Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure of Mining Industry Companies. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 2(3), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v2i3.156
  58. Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Skiftenes Flak, L. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007
  59. Samiilenko, H., Ivanova, N., Shaposhnykova, I., Vasylchenko, L., Solomakha, I., & Povna, S. (2021). Corruption as a Threat to Economic Security of the Country. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21(12), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2021.21.12.44
  60. Sari, R. (2025). Challenges in Sustainability Auditing: Measuring Environmental and Social Impacts in Modern Enterprises. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v3i1.416
  61. Satti, J. A., & Rasool, S. W. (2024). Exploring the Role of Technology in Enhancing Government Transparency and Accountability. Harf-o-Sukhan, 8(2), 621–633. https://www.harf-o-sukhan.com/index.php/Harf-o-sukhan/article/view/1381
  62. Simelio, N., Ginesta, X., de San Eugenio Vela, J., & Corcoy, M. (2019). Journalism, transparency and citizen participation: a methodological tool to evaluate information published on municipal websites. Information, Communication & Society, 22(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1386706
  63. Soylu, A., Corcho, Ó., Elvesæter, B., Badenes-Olmedo, C., Yedro-Martínez, F., Kovacic, M., Posinkovic, M., Medvešček, M., Makgill, I., & Taggart, C. (2022). Data quality barriers for transparency in public procurement. Information, 13(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13020099
  64. Vadlamannati, K. C. (2015). Fighting corruption or elections? The politics of anti-corruption policies in India: A subnational study. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(4), 1035–1052. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.01.002
  65. Yusuf, I. M. (2018). Etika Dalam Wujud Akuntabilitas Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 4(4), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.25157/dinamika.v4i4.877
  66. Z. D. Siahay, A., C. Seralurin, Y., Ervina, M. T., & Pattiasina, V. (2023). Professional Competence and Skepticism on Audit Quality. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i2.114