Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 118 Download : 95

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh ESG Disclosure dan komponennya—Environmental Disclosure, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, dan Corporate Governance Disclosure—terhadap kinerja perusahaan yang diproksikan dengan Tobin’s Q. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menguji peran moderasi dari Kualitas Audit dalam memperkuat atau memperlemah hubungan antara ESG Disclosure dan kinerja perusahaan.


Metode Penelitian: Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode regresi panel. Data sekunder diperoleh dari laporan tahunan, keberlanjutan, dan keuangan perusahaan yang dikategorikan dalam industri energi dan terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) selama periode 2020–2022. Sampel dipilih menggunakan metode purposive sampling, menghasilkan 27 perusahaan sebagai unit analisis.


Hasil dan Pembahasan: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ESG Disclosure memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap Tobin’s Q. Namun, Environmental dan Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure justru berpengaruh negatif. Pengaruh Corporate Governance Disclosure tidak signifikan terhadap kinerja. Sementara itu, variabel moderasi Kualitas Audit tidak berperan dalam memperkuat hubungan ESG dan kinerja perusahaan.


Implikasi: Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya penguatan praktik ESG yang strategis dan relevan di Indonesia untuk mendorong minat investor dan meningkatkan nilai perusahaan melalui pengungkapan informasi keberlanjutan yang berkualitas.

Keywords

environmental disclosure corporate social responsibility disclosure corporate governance disclosure kinerja perusahaan kualitas audit

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Chelsya, C. (2025). Peran Moderasi Audit Quality: Hubungan antara Sustainability Reporting dan Keberlanjutan Kinerja Perusahaan. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 3(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v3i3.526
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abrar, N. A., Tjan, J. S., & Ikhtiari, K. (2023). Analyzing Audit Quality: Experience, Motivation, Audit Fees with Auditor Ethics as Moderator. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(2 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i2.111
  2. Ademi, B., & Klungseth, N. J. (2022). Does it pay to deliver superior ESG performance? Evidence from US S&P 500 companies. Journal of Global Responsibility, 13(4), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-01-2022-0006
  3. Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2021). The effect of board composition and managerial pay on Saudi firm performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 57(2), 693–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-00959-4
  4. Al-Hazaima, H., Arabiat, O., & Maayah, G. (2025). The double-edged sword of forensic accounting services: litigation risks in Jordan’s industrial sector. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(1), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-07-2023-0414
  5. Al-Issa, N., Audil Rashid, K., Ammar, J., Somar, A.-M., Dina, F., & and Limani, E. (2022). Impact of environmental, social, governance, and corporate social responsibility factors on firm’s marketing expenses and firm value: A panel study of US companies. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2135214. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2135214
  6. Alareeni, B. A., & Hamdan, A. (2020). ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(7), 1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0258
  7. Alhawaj, A., Buallay, A., & Abdallah, W. (2023). Sustainability reporting and energy sectorial performance: developed and emerging economies. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 17(4), 739–760. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-10-2020-0020
  8. Alkhalaileh, R., Alshurafat, H., Ananzeh, H., & Al Amosh, H. (2024). The impact of external auditors with forensic accounting competencies on auditee firm performance. Heliyon, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32099
  9. Almeyda, R., & Darmansya, A. (2019). The Influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure on Firm Financial Performance. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 0(5), 278. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23546026.y2019i5.6340
  10. Alshurafat, H. (2024). New variables and measurements of forensic accounting: implications on financial reporting and auditing. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00544-4
  11. Anwar, R., & Malik, J. A. (2020). When does corporate social responsibility disclosure affect investment efficiency? A new answer to an old question. Sage Open, 10(2), 2158244020931121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020931121
  12. Asandimitra, N. L. R. & N. (2018). Pengaruh demografi, financial knowledge, financial attitude, locus of control dan financial self-efficacy terhadap financial management behavior masyarakat surabaya. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 6(2010), 1–107.
  13. Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998
  14. Buallay, A. (2020). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371
  15. Buallay, A., & Al Marri, M. (2022). Sustainability disclosure and its impact on telecommunication and information technology sectors’ performance: worldwide evidence. International Journal of Emergency Services, 11(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0371
  16. Buallay, A., Hamdan, A., & Zureigat, Q. (2017). Corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v11i1.6
  17. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
  18. Crain, M. A., Hopwood, W. S., Gendler, R. S., Young, G. R., & Pacini, C. (2019). Essentials of forensic accounting. John Wiley & Sons.
  19. Dakhli, A. (2022). The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm financial performance: does audit quality matter? Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(5), 950–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2021-0150
  20. Dang, G. T. T., Huu, A. N., & Nguyen, T. P. (2023). Impact of corporate governance on firm value: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. International Conference on Emerging Challenges: Strategic Adaptation in The World of Uncertainties (ICECH 2022), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-150-0_5
  21. Darmawan, A., Nairobi, N., Rakhmadi, R., & Atiqasani, G. (2023). The Impact of the Russia and Ukraine War on Indonesian Economic and Trade Performance. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 15(1), 36.
  22. Dasinapa, M. B. (2024). The Integration of Sustainability and ESG Accounting into Corporate Reporting Practices. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 2(1 SE-), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v2i1.167
  23. Deegan, C. (2014). An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, 248–272.
  24. Dewi, M. R. K., Hapsoro, D., & Trisanti, T. (2022). The Effect Of Profitability On Firm Value With Environmental Disclosure And Environmental Performance As Mediation Variables. Maranatha International Conference On Business And Economics. http://repositorybaru.stieykpn.ac.id/id/eprint/396
  25. Dmytriyev, S. D., & Freeman, R. E. (2023). R. Edward Freeman’s selected works on stakeholder theory and business ethics (Vol. 53). Springer nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04564-6
  26. Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
  27. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
  28. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
  29. Gold, S., & Heikkurinen, P. (2018). Transparency fallacy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2088
  30. Grantham, R. B. (2020). Law and practice of corporate governance. Law and Practice of Corporate Governance LexisNexis, Sydney.
  31. Hayat, F., Hamza, N., & Tariq, A. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Indian Context. Journal of World Economy Transformations & Transitions, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.52459/jowett24160922
  32. Itan, I., Sylvia, S., Septiany, S., & Chen, R. (2025). The influence of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on market reaction: evidence from emerging markets. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01085-0
  33. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Also published in Foundations of Organizational Strategy. Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 305–360. http://ssrn.com/abstract=94043Electroniccopyavailableat:http://ssrn.com/abstract=94043http://hupress.harvard.edu/catalog/JENTHF.html
  34. Juniarti, D., & Eduardus. (2016). Kinerja Sosial Perusahaan dan Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan yang Diukur Menggunakan Tobin’s Q. Business Accounting Review, 4(1), 517–528.
  35. Kartal, M. T., Kılıç Depren, S., Pata, U. K., Taşkın, D., & Şavlı, T. (2024). Modeling the link between environmental, social, and governance disclosures and scores: the case of publicly traded companies in the Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index. Financial Innovation, 10(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-024-00619-1
  36. Khandelwal, V., Sharma, P., & Chotia, V. (2023). ESG disclosure and firm performance: An asset-pricing approach. Risks, 11(6), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11060112.
  37. Kiran, M., Chughtai, S., Rabbani, M. R., & Aysan, A. F. (2024). ESG disclosure and cost of finance: the moderating role of managerial ownership. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2024-0251
  38. Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2019). Determinants of climate change disclosures in the Turkish banking industry. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(3), 901–926. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-08-2018-0206
  39. Lai, A., Melloni, G., & Stacchezzini, R. (2016). Corporate sustainable development: is ‘integrated reporting’a legitimation strategy? Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1863
  40. Lange, D., & Bundy, J. (2018). The Association between Ethics and Stakeholder Theory. In Sustainability, Stakeholder Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility (Vol. 38, pp. 365–387). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000038019
  41. Lin, W. L., Law, S. H., Ho, J. A., & Sambasivan, M. (2019). The causality direction of the corporate social responsibility – Corporate financial performance Nexus: Application of Panel Vector Autoregression approach. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 401–418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.03.004
  42. Maaloul, A., Zéghal, D., Ben Amar, W., & Mansour, S. (2023). The Effect of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and Disclosure on Cost of Debt: The Mediating Effect of Corporate Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021-00130-8
  43. Muslim, M. (2023). How Good Corporate Governance Influences Company Value through Financial Performance. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v1i2.97
  44. Peng, L. S., & Isa, M. (2020). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and performance in Shariah firms: agency or stakeholder theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2020.16.1.1.
  45. Rahmatika, D. N. (2021). Exploring The Relation Of Environmental Disclosure, Environmental Performance And Company Characteristics In Indonesia; An Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 5(4). https://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/IJEBAR/article/view/3806.
  46. Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 13(2), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767
  47. Samy El-Deeb, M., Ismail, T. H., & El Banna, A. A. (2023). Does audit quality moderate the impact of environmental, social and governance disclosure on firm value? Further evidence from Egypt. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 5(4), 293–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-11-2022-0155
  48. Sandewa, W., & Baskoro, R. A. (2019). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Performance: Evidence from Non-financial Sector in ASEAN-5 Countries 2012-2016. 3rd Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities Universitas Indonesia Conference (APRISH 2018), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.2991/aprish-18.2019.34
  49. Shaikh, I. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practice and firm performance: an international evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(1), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16202
  50. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  51. Taha, R., Taha, N., & Ananzeh, H. (2025). Determinants of litigation risk in the Jordanian financial sector: the role of firm-specific indicators. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(1), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2023-0239
  52. Tamasiga, P., Onyeaka, H., Bakwena, M., & Ouassou, E. houssin. (2024). Beyond compliance: evaluating the role of environmental, social and governance disclosures in enhancing firm value and performance. SN Business & Economics, 4(10), 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-024-00714-6
  53. Valentinov, V., & Chia, R. (2022). Stakeholder theory: A process‐ontological perspective. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(3), 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12441
  54. Wicaksono, A. P. (2023). Environmental, social, governance and firm performance in developing countries: Evidence from southeast Asian. Etikonomi, 22(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.15408/etk.v22i1.25271
  55. Yadav, S., Samadhiya, A., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., & Pandey, K. K. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting and missing (m) scores in the industry 5.0 era: Broadening firms’ and investors’ decisions to achieve sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3306
  56. Yu, X., & Xiao, K. (2022). Does ESG performance affect firm value? Evidence from a new ESG-scoring approach for Chinese enterprises. Sustainability, 14(24), 16940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416940.
  57. Zahid, R. M. A., Saleem, A., & Maqsood, U. S. (2023). ESG performance, capital financing decisions, and audit quality: empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 44086–44099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25345-6
  58. Zahid, R. M. A., Saleem, A., Maqsood, U. S., & Sági, J. (2024). Moderating role of audit quality in ESG performance and capital financing dynamics: insights in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(5), 12031–12060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03636-9