Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 70 Download : 43

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami fenomena Fraud dalam pengadaan barang dan jasa di pemerintah daerah Indonesia dengan menitikberatkan pada perspektif para pemangku kepentingan..


Metode Penelitian: Penelitian ini mengonstruksi model Hexagon Fraud Theory guna menganalisis dinamika dan faktor penyebab Fraud secara komprehensif di daerah Toraja Utara, Toraja, Luwu, dan Kota Palopo. Informan utama terdiri dari pimpinan OPD, DPRD, dan pihak rekanan swasta, dipilih melalui purposive dan snowball sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dan dokumentasi, dianalisis menggunakan konsep fenomenologi Husserl (Noema, Noesis, Epoche), serta melalui tahapan transkripsi, pengodean, kategorisasi, triangulasi, dan refleksi peneliti guna membangun pemahaman mendalam dan holistik atas persepsi serta motivasi pelaku dalam konteks fraud.


Hasil dan Pembahasan: Fraud dalam pengadaan pemerintah daerah merupakan masalah sistemik yang dipengaruhi oleh struktur politik, birokrasi, dan lemahnya pengawasan. Political capture memungkinkan fraud berlangsung secara terstruktur, karena sistem pengadaan dimanfaatkan oleh aktor politik untuk melanggengkan kekuasaan dan kepentingan kelompoknya.


Implikasi: Upaya pemberantasan fraud dalam pengadaan harus dilakukan dengan penguatan regulasi dan sistem pengawasan dan mencakup reformasi struktural yang membatasi dominasi politik dalam pengambilan keputusan pengadaan. Peningkatan transparansi, independensi pengawas, serta membangun budaya birokrasi yang lebih akuntabel diharapkan dapat meminimalisir fraud dalam pengadaan.

Keywords

fraud pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah daerah hexagon fraud theory

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Yulitasari, Y., Haliah, H., & Nirwana, N. (2025). Fenomena Political Capture dan Faktor Penyebab fraud dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Fenomenologis. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 3(3), 382–407. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v3i3.533
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent For Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(4), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-3/1823
  2. Amundsen, I. (1999). Political corruption: An introduction to the issues (Chr. Michelsen Institute Working Paper No. 7). In CMI Working Paper WP 1999:7.
  3. Argandona, A. (2007). The United Nations Convention Against Corruption and its Impact on International Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9524-z
  4. Cilesiz, S. (2011). A Phenomenological Approach to Experiences With Technology: Current State, Promise, and Future Directions for Research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9173-2
  5. Craja, P., Kim, A., & Lessmann, S. (2020). Deep Learning for Detecting Financial Statement Fraud. Decision Support Systems, 113421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113421
  6. Driel, H. Van. (2018). Financial Fraud, Scandals, and Regulation: A conceptual Framework and Literature Review. Business History, 61(8), 1259–1299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2018.1519026
  7. Edmonds, M., Sorensen, K. B., & Stallings, M. A. (2021). The Invisible Fraud: The Impact of Inattentional Blindness on Auditor Fraud Detection. Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 6(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2019-500
  8. Fourie, D., & Malan, C. (2020). Public Procurement In The South African Economy: Addressing The Systemic Issues. Sustainability, 12(20), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208692
  9. Gee, J., & Button, M. (2019). The financial Cost Of Fraud. University of Portsmouth, 1–20.
  10. Graycar, A. (2019). Mapping Corruption In Procurement. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2018-0063
  11. Groenewald, T. (2004). A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300104
  12. Horwath, C. (2011). Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough: Introducing the Fraud Pentagon. In Crowe Horwath LLP.
  13. Https://makassar.tribunnews.com/2022/07/20/empat-terdakwa-kasus-korupsi pkbm-palopo-divonis-bersalah-masing-masing-satu-tahun penjara?page=all akses per tanggal 30-01-2024
  14. Jan, C. (2018). An Effective Financial Statements Fraud Detection Model for The Sustainable Development of Financial Markets: Evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020513
  15. Kanapickiene, R., & Grundiene, Z. (2015). The Model of Fraud Detection in Financial Statements by Means of Financial Ratios. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.545
  16. Kelly, S. D. (2007). Edmund Husserl and Phenomenology. In The Blackwell Guide to Continental Philosophy (pp. 112–136). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470997093.ch7
  17. Knaack, P. (1984). Phenomenological Research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 6(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394598400600108
  18. Kratcoski, P. C. (2018). Introduction: Overview of Major Types of Fraud and Corruption. Fraud and Corruption, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92333-8
  19. Levi, M. (2018). Organized fraud and organizing frauds: Crime Opportunity Theories, 245–275. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095301-12
  20. Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). Psychological Pathways to Fraud: Understanding and Preventing Fraud in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0741-0
  21. Palmer, M., Larkin, M., Visser, R. de, & Fadden, G. (2010). Developing an Interpretative Phenomenological Approach to Focus Group Data. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(2), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802513194
  22. Rassi, F., & Shahabi, Z. (2015). Husserl’s Phenomenology and Two Terms of Noema and Noesis. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 53, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.53.29
  23. Raymond, J. (2008). Benchmarking In Public Procurement. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(6), 782–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770810915940
  24. Rustiarini, N. W., T, S., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Why People Commit Public Procurement Fraud? The Fraud Diamond View. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(4), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-2019-0012
  25. Schuchter, A., & Levi, M. (2013). The Fraud Triangle Revisited. Security Journal, 29(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.1
  26. Shim, M. K. (2005). The Duality Of Non-conceptual Content In Husserl’s Phenomenology Of Perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-5851-7
  27. Skalak, S. L., Alas, M. A., & Sellitto, G. (2011). Fraud: An Introduction. In A Guide to Forensic Accounting Investigation (pp. 1–23). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119200048.ch1
  28. Szanto, T. (2014). Social Phenomenology: Husserl, Intersubjectivity, and Collective Intentionality. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 22(2), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2014.896624
  29. Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Fraud-The Human Face Of Fraud: Understanding The Suspect Is Vital To Any Investigation. Journla of Financial Crime, 136(4), 1–18.
  30. Wilding, C., & Whiteford, G. (2015). Phenomenological Research: An Exploration of Conceptual, Theoretical, and Practical Issues. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 25(3), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/153944920502500303
  31. Wimpenny, P., & Gass, J. (2000). Interviewing in Phenomenology and Grounded Theory: Is There A Difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1485–1492. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01431.x
  32. Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
  33. Zalm, J. E. Van der, & Bergum, V. (2000). Hermeneutic-phenomenology: Providing Living Knowledge For Nursing Practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), 211–218.