Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate companies' challenges in implementing ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles in modern corporate financial reporting. It seeks to address critical questions about the primary obstacles to ESG adoption and strategies to overcome them, enhancing the effectiveness and reliability of reporting practices.


Research Method: A qualitative systematic literature review synthesized findings from recent academic and industry publications. This approach comprehensively examined the existing literature on ESG implementation, highlighting key challenges and potential solutions. The methodology focused on identifying patterns, comparing global practices, and linking theoretical frameworks with practical implications.


Results and Discussion: The study found significant challenges, including inconsistent ESG reporting standards, internal company resistance, and limitations in human and technological resources. It revealed that successful integration requires active stakeholder engagement, continuous training, and leveraging advanced technology for effective data management. The research also highlighted discrepancies in the adoption of ESG practices between developed and developing regions, noting that more robust regulatory frameworks in places like Europe facilitate better implementation than in regions facing regulatory and resource constraints. The findings emphasized the relevance of stakeholder theory in promoting transparency and accountability and the importance of fostering a culture that supports sustainability.


Implications: The study contributes to academic knowledge by expanding on existing theories and linking them to practical strategies for ESG implementation. For managers and policymakers, the research offers insights into designing adaptive frameworks and practices that cater to local and global contexts. Future research should include empirical studies to validate these findings and explore region-specific challenges for deeper practical insights.

Keywords

ESG reporting corporate sustainability regulatory challenges stakeholder theory organizational culture

Article Details

How to Cite
Wibowo, H. A. S., Noy, I., & Sutisman, E. (2026). Evaluation of the Challenges of Implementing Sustainability and ESG Principles in Modern Corporate Financial Reporting. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 4(1), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v4i1.738

References

  1. Adams, C. A. (2020). Sustainable development goals disclosure (SDGD) recommendations: feedback on. https://mail.scaak.org/uploads/files/2020/February/07/Adams_2020_Feedback-on-the-consultation1581066702.pdf
  2. Adams, C. A., & Abhayawansa, S. (2022). Connecting the COVID-19 pandemic, environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing and calls for ‘harmonisation’ of sustainability reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 82, 102309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102309
  3. AKANG, A. U. D. O. M. (2023). Regulatory Compliance and Access to Finance: Implications for Business Growth in Developing Economies. Sciental Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.62536/sjehss.2023.v1.i2.pp8-23
  4. Annesi, N., Battaglia, M., Ceglia, I., & Mercuri, F. (2024). Navigating paradoxes: building a sustainable strategy for an integrated ESG corporate governance. Management Decision, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-2006
  5. Bezerra, R. R. R., Martins, V. W. B., & Macedo, A. N. (2024). Validation of Challenges for Implementing ESG in the Construction Industry Considering the Context of an Emerging Economy Country. Applied Sciences, 14(14), 6024. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14146024
  6. Bose, S. (2020). Evolution of ESG Reporting Frameworks BT - Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting (D. C. Esty & T. Cort (eds.); pp. 13–33). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6_2
  7. Chopra, S. S., Senadheera, S. S., Dissanayake, P. D., Withana, P. A., Chib, R., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2024). Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(2), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020606
  8. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
  9. Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508281
  10. Cort, T., & Esty, D. (2020). ESG standards: Looming challenges and pathways forward. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266209453
  11. Cruz, C. A., & Matos, F. (2023). ESG maturity: A software framework for the challenges of ESG data in investment. Sustainability, 15(3), 2610. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032610
  12. Diez-Cañamero, B., Bishara, T., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., Minguez, R., & Fernández, J. M. (2020). Measurement of corporate social responsibility: A review of corporate sustainability indexes, rankings and ratings. Sustainability, 12(5), 2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052153
  13. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
  14. Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116. https://mithconference.com/lander
  15. Elidrisy, A. (2024). Comparative Review of ESG Reporting Standards: ESRS European Sustainability Reporting Standards” versus ISSB “International Sustainability Standards Board. International Multilingual Journal of Science and Technology, 3, 7191–7198. http://www.imjst.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/IMJSTP29120998.pdf.
  16. Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351280129
  17. Flower, J. (2015). The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.002
  18. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Han, B. (2024). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Fostering sustainability: integrating social responsibility, green finance, and corporate performance. Economic Change and Restructuring, 57(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-024-09656-3
  20. Hörisch, J., Schaltegger, S., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: A conceptual synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 124097. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124097
  21. Ibrahim, M., Auwal, B. M., Balarabe, A. S., & Isa, I. A. (2024). Sustainability Reporting Frameworks A Comparative Analysis of Reporting Standards and their Implications for Accounting and Reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Administrative Research, 1(2), 32–47. https://ijafar.com.ng/index.php/ijafar/article/download/75/28
  22. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate sustainability: A strategy? Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper, 19–065. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312191
  23. Jones, T. M., Harrison, J. S., Felps, W., Jones, T. M., & Harrison, J. S. (2018). How Applying Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Can Provide Sustainable Competitive Advantage Published by : Academy of Management Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references . H. 43(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0111
  24. Junior, R. M., Best, P. J., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sustainability Reporting and Assurance: A Historical Analysis on a World-Wide Phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1637-y
  25. Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., & Sonwaney, V. (2024). Stakeholders’ perspectives on critical success factors for environmental social and governance (ESG) implementation. Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121583. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121583
  26. Kotsantonis, S., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Four things no one will tell you about ESG data. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12346
  27. Kurnia, I., Purwanti, A., Judijanto, L., Samiun, A. A., & Saripujiana, D. (2024). Integrating Esg Metrics Into Traditional Accounting Systems: A Framework For Future Practice. Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING), 7(6), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i6.12381
  28. Lai, A., & Stacchezzini, R. (2021). Organisational and professional challenges amid the evolution of sustainability reporting: a theoretical framework and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2021-1199
  29. Laine, M., Tregidga, H., & Unerman, J. (2021). Sustainability accounting and accountability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003185611
  30. Lokuwaduge, C. S. D. S., & Heenetigala, K. (2017). Integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure for a sustainable development: An Australian study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1927
  31. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2020). Reflections on the 2018 decade award: The meaning and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 7–28.
  32. Mrabure, K. O., & Abhulimhen-Iyoha, A. (2020). Corporate governance and protection of stakeholders rights and interests. Beijing L. Rev., 11, 292. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2020.111020
  33. Mubin, M., Utami, E. W., & Muhsyaf, S. A. (2023). Tren Penelitian Implementasi Prinsip ESG dalam Praktik Akuntansi: Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, 9(3), 377–380. https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v9i3.376
  34. Qiu, K. (2024). Achieving Sustainable Development Through ESG Integration: A Comprehensive Analysis. 2024 10th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2024), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-277-4_15
  35. Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence driven approaches to strengthening Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria in sustainable business practices: a review. Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria in Sustainable Business Practices: A Review (May 27, 2024). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4843215
  36. Rehman, A., & Umar, T. (2024). Literature review: Industry 5.0. Leveraging technologies for environmental, social and governance advancement in corporate settings. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-11-2023-0502
  37. Roolvink, G. J. (2024). Managing paradoxes in difficult times: Risk and opportunity for ESG. University of Twente. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0348
  38. Scamans, S. (2024). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive’s (CSRD) impacts on stakeholders: an analysis of the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2024052436368
  39. Schaltegger, S., Hörisch, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Business cases for sustainability: A stakeholder theory perspective. Organization & Environment, 32(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617722882
  40. Siew, R. Y. J. (2015). A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Journal of Environmental Management, 164, 180–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.010
  41. Solaimani, S. (2024). From Compliance to Capability: On the Role of Data and Technology in Environment, Social, and Governance. Sustainability, 16(14), 6061. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146061
  42. Stubbs, W., Higgins, C., & Higgins, C. (2018). Stakeholders ’ Perspectives on the Role of Regulatory Reform in Integrated Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2954-0
  43. Sun, P., Doh, J. P., Rajwani, T., & Siegel, D. (2021). Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1818. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00438-x
  44. Taliento, M., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2019). Impact of environmental, social, and governance information on economic performance: Evidence of a corporate ‘sustainability advantage’from Europe. Sustainability, 11(6), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061738
  45. Ulvtorp, H. (2024). Management practices and digital strategies for enhanced ESG reporting quality. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1875082.
  46. Villiers, C. (2022). New Directions in the European Union’s Regulatory Framework for Corporate Reporting, Due Diligence and Accountability: The Challenge of Complexity. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 13(4), 548–566. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/err.2022.25
  47. Widyawati, L. (2020). A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393
  48. Yébenes, M. O. (2024). Climate change, ESG criteria and recent regulation: challenges and opportunities. Eurasian Economic Review, 14(1), 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00251-x
  49. Young-Ferris, A., & Roberts, J. (2023). ‘Looking for something that isn’t there’: a case study of an early attempt at ESG integration in investment decision making. European Accounting Review, 32(3), 717–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.2000458
  50. Yudatama, U., Dianto, I. A., ST, S., Kom, S., Ak, M., Fergina, A., Kom, S., Kom, M., Tisnawati, R., & Kom, S. (2023). Sistem Enterprise di Era Digital: Inovasi, Transformasi, dan Keberlanjutan. Kaizen Media Publishing.
  51. Zahari, A. I., Said, J., Muhamad, N., & Ramly, S. M. (2024). Ethical culture and leadership for sustainability and governance in public sector organisations within the ESG framework. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100219
  52. Zenkina, I. V. (2024). Integrating sustainability factors into corporate financial reporting in the modern ESG agenda context. Part 2. https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.27.6.606