Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 7 Download : 4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate and analyze the effect of responsiveness and reliability of public services on public satisfaction with the Dompu Subdistrict Government. The study hypothesizes that both responsiveness and reliability have a positive and significant influence on public satisfaction.


Research Method: This study used a quantitative approach with an explanatory research design. Primary data were collected through questionnaires distributed to 60 service users at the Dompu Subdistrict Government, selected using purposive sampling. The research variables were responsiveness and reliability as independent variables, and public satisfaction as the dependent variable. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS).


Results and Discussion: The findings show that responsiveness and reliability have a positive and significant effect on public satisfaction. Reliability, particularly data accuracy and consistency of service procedures, was found to be the more dominant factor compared with responsiveness. Together, responsiveness and reliability explain 64.7% of the variation in public satisfaction.


Implications: The results indicate that improving public satisfaction requires synergy between responsive service delivery and accurate, consistent administrative performance. Future studies are recommended to include other dimensions of service quality to provide a more comprehensive understanding of factors affecting public satisfaction.


Originality: This study provides empirical evidence on the dominant role of reliability in shaping public satisfaction within subdistrict-level public services, specifically in the Dompu Subdistrict Government.

Keywords

responsiveness reliability public satisfaction public service

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pratiwi, A. C., Hayat, N., & Ramadhan, R. (2026). Public Service Responsiveness and Reliability on Public Satisfaction: A Study at the Dompu Subdistrict Government Office, Indonesia. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 4(2), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v4i2.753
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Awaliah et al., (2025). Faktor-Faktor Penentu Kepuasan Masyarakat dalam Pelayanan Administrasi di Kelurahan Dorotangga. Jurnal Economic Resources, 8(2), 1373–1381. https://doi.org/10.57178/jer.v8i2.1746
  2. Engkus et al., (2021). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Jurnal DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 19(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v19i1.62
  3. Fikri. (2018). Efisiensi dan Responsivitas Birokrasi.
  4. Hair et al., (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis.
  5. Hariyanti et al., (2024). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Administrasi Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat. Kajian Ilmiah Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik (KIMAP), 5(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26618/kimap.v5i5.16276
  6. Hasanah, A. U., Andaryani, S., Sari, F. H., & Dwikurniawati, I. U. (2024). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Teknologi Digital : Tantangan dan Peluang di Pemerintah Daerah. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research Volume, 4(5), 5228–5235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i5.15469
  7. Hasibuan, F. H., Siagian, K. F., & Zein, A. W. (2025). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 02(June), 481–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15683326
  8. Hardiyansyah. (2018). Kualitas pelayanan publik: Konsep, dimensi, indikator, dan implementasinya (Edisi Revisi). Gava Media.
  9. Juharni, A. U., & Bahri, S. (2025). Analysis of Public Service Quality towards Community Satisfaction at the Segeri District Office, Pangkajene and Islands Regency. Paradigma: Journal of Administration, 3(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.35965/pja.v3i1.6225
  10. Lilah, N. Z., & Ibrahim, M. (2025). Pengaruh Responsive Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Masyarakat di Kantor Desa Bulo Kabupaten Sidenreng Rappang. Jurnal Publikasi Manajemen Informatika, 4(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55606/jupumi.v4i3.4163
  11. Nurani & Nugroho. (2025). Analisis Faktor Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Kota Surakarta Dengan Multiple Linear Regression. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Indonesia (JPTI), 5(3), 719–733. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52436/1.jpti.697
  12. Parasuraman et al., (1988). Servqual : A Multiple-Item Scale For Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
  13. Rabaali. (2024). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat (Studi Pada Kantor Kecamatan Banda). PRAJA Observer: Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 4(06), 23–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.69957/praob.v4i06.1678
  14. Rindo, S., Rusmiwari, S., Larasati, D. C., Negara, I. A., & Tunggadewi, U. T. (2017). Pengaruh responsivitas pegawai kantor pdam kota malang terhadap kepuasan pelanggan dalam penyediaan air bersih. JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 6(1), 69–76.
  15. Syamsumarlin. (2025). Birokrasi Di Era Digital : Transformasi Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Kecamatan Tammerodo Sendana Kabupaten Majene. Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(2021), 274–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v1i10.689
  16. Tjiptono, F. (2019). Pemasaran Jasa: Prinsip, Penerapan, dan Penelitian. Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.
  17. Widagdhaprasana, M., Sukarno, A. W., Laksmi, P., & Suci, N. (2025). Menuju Pelayanan Digital Berkualitas : Survei Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Pelayanan Digital Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 2024. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v5i1.2274
  18. Widanti. (2022). Konsep Good Governance dalam Perspektif Pelayanan Publik : Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Abdimas Peradaban, 3(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.54783/ap.v3i1.11