Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the impact of internal control effectiveness on organizational performance, with a focus on the mediating role of governance mechanisms. It aims to explore how internal controls contribute to transparency, accountability, and overall quality of governance.


Research Design and Methodology: The study employs a mixed-method approach, combining empirical analysis and theoretical perspectives from corporate governance and organizational behavior. Data were collected through a literature review, case studies, and statistical analysis of financial performance metrics to assess the relationship between internal controls and governance outcomes.


Findings and Discussion: The results indicate a positive correlation between internal control effectiveness and financial reporting quality. Strong control mechanisms enhance transparency and accountability, while governance elements such as board oversight, organizational culture, and stakeholder engagement influence internal control practices. The study also finds that internal controls mediate the relationship between governance mechanisms and organizational performance, reinforcing the link between governance, risk management, and performance.


Implications: The findings suggest that organizations should prioritize board composition, independence, and expertise while fostering a culture of integrity and accountability. These insights contribute to the field of corporate governance research and underscore the importance of interdisciplinary approaches. Future studies should explore industry-specific governance challenges and the role of technology in internal control systems.

Keywords

Internal Control Corporate Governance Organizational Performance Board Oversight Organizational Culture

Article Details

How to Cite
Ahmad, H., & Muslim, M. (2024). Exploring the Nexus between Internal Control Structures and Good Corporate Governance. Advances in Applied Accounting Research, 2(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.60079/aaar.v2i2.311

References

  1. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2006). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 20(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.2.207
  2. Brown, C., & Caylor, M. (2006). Corporate Governance and Firm Valuation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(4), 409-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.06.002
  3. Chen, Y., Li, M., & Hu, Q. (2023). Technological Innovation and Internal Control Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(1), 36–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2077425
  4. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal Control—Integrated Framework. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190871557.001.0001
  5. Cox, T. (1994). Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
  6. Deumes, R., & Knechel, W. R. (2008). Economic Consequences of Increasing the Auditor's Assessment Risk by Relying on Internal Auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.1
  7. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  8. Financial Reporting Council. (2018). UK Corporate Governance Code. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2018.1469635
  9. Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. (2022). Stakeholder Governance: A Path to Sustainable Success. Business Ethics Quarterly, 32(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.38
  11. Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., Noguera-Gámez, L., & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2021). Board Diversity and Internal Control Effectiveness: An Empirical Analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(4), 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12383
  12. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
  13. Gupta, S., Sharma, S., & Kumar, S. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in Corporate Governance: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-04927-8
  14. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2007.05.001
  15. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  16. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  17. Jones, A., & Wang, L. (2022). Agile Internal Control: Integrating Agile Principles into Control Frameworks. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 40, 100542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100542
  18. Jordão, R. V. (2012). The Importance of Internal Controls in Corporate Governance. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 1(3), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgr_v1_i3_p6
  19. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  20. Khan, M., Ahmed, S., & Butt, S. (2020). Governance in Times of Crisis: An Empirical Analysis of COVID-19’s Impact on Corporate Governance Practices. Journal of Business Research, 117, 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.019
  21. Kim, J., & Park, S. (2022). Integrating Environmental, Social, and Governance Metrics into Internal Control Frameworks: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 197(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04746-0
  22. Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit Committee Quality and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 649-675. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.649
  23. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1997). Legal Determinants of External Finance. Journal of Finance, 52(4), 1131-1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x
  24. Li, F. (2010). The Information Content of Forward-Looking Statements in Corporate Filings: A Neglected Aspect of Disclosure Content. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2009.01047.x
  25. Liang, H., Liu, X., & Zhang, C. (2021). Blockchain Technology and Internal Control: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40(1), 106860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106860
  26. Oba, V. C. (2019). The Role of Internal Control in Enhancing Corporate Governance: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 30(4), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22429
  27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Principles of Corporate Governance. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236882-en
  28. Popa, M. I. (2011). Internal Control - A Condition for Good Corporate Governance. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 13(2), 747-755. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10193-011-0046-6
  29. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. (2003). Auditing Standard No. 2: An Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with an Audit of Financial Statements. https://doi.org/10.2469/dig.v32.n1.2109
  30. References for Literature Review:
  31. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  32. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Sage Publications.
  33. Smith, J., Johnson, R., & Williams, T. (2021). Technology-Enabled Controls and Cybersecurity Threats: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Information Systems, 35(1), 129–150. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-52457
  34. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33(47), 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-685370-9.50009-4
  35. Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2000). A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Executive Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Executive Suite. Human Relations, 53(7), 1077-1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700537001
  36. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & Collectivism. Westview Press.
  37. Wang, C., Zhang, Y., & Li, L. (2023). Data Analytics and Internal Control Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Information Systems, 37(1), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-54638
  38. Zaman, M., He, W., & Mahmood, T. (2016). Impact of Internal Auditing on Internal Control Systems: Evidence from Pakistan. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 27, 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2016.10.003
  39. Zhang, Y. (2010). Internal Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 6(1), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439131011014906
  40. Zhao, Y., Wang, S., & Chen, J. (2020). Crisis Management and Internal Control Effectiveness: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 28(5), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-01-2020-0014
  41. Zheng, X., Huang, L., & Zeng, Y. (2020). Crisis Management and Internal Control Effectiveness: An Empirical Study. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(1), 106694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.106694