Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the effects of institutional ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and firm size on the financial performance of mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), with Return on Assets (ROA) used as the performance indicator.


Research Method: This study employed a quantitative explanatory design using audited annual report data from 30 IDX-listed mining companies during 2021–2023, generating 90 firm-year observations. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with SPSS after conducting classical assumption tests.


Results and Discussion: Institutional ownership, independent commissioners, audit committees, and firm size have positive and significant effects on ROA. Firm size has the strongest effect, indicating that larger firms are better positioned to achieve operational efficiency, economies of scale, and broader access to financing. The positive governance effects demonstrate that effective ownership monitoring, board independence, and audit oversight strengthen managerial accountability and asset utilization.


Implications: Companies should strengthen governance practices beyond formal compliance, while regulators should promote effective monitoring and accountability. Future studies should examine longer periods, other industries, additional performance measures, and governance quality indicators.


Originality: This study provides sector-specific evidence from Indonesia’s mining industry on the combined role of governance mechanisms and firm size in explaining asset profitability.

Keywords

corporate governance institutional ownership independent commissioners audit committee firm size financial performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Arumbarkah, A. M., Mahfudnurnajamuddin, M., Syahnur, M. H. ., & Muslim, M. (2026). Corporate Governance Mechanisms, Firm Size, and Financial Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Mining Companies. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 4(3), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v4i3.1058

References

  1. Abdillah, & Jogiyanto. (2011). Partial Least Squares (PLS), Alternatif Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dalam Penelitian Bisnis. Andi.
  2. Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q., & Terjesen, S. A. (2018). Corporate Governance Deviance. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0394
  3. Ahmed, A. M., Sharif, N. A., Ali, M. N., & Hágen, I. (2023). Effect of Firm Size on the Association between Capital Structure and Profitability. Sustainability, 15(14), 11196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411196
  4. Ahmed, M., Zehou, S., Raza, S. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2020). Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well‐being. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2225–2239.
  5. Altın, M. (2024). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance: a cross-country meta-analysis. Management Decision, 62. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2023-0511
  6. Arimby, R., & Astuti, T. D. (2023). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 7(3), 1099–1112.
  7. Aryani, W., & Laksmiwati, M. (2021). Pengaruh Current Ratio, Return on Equity, Debt to Equity Ratio dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Price Book Value. Studi Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 1(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.35912/sakman.v1i1.397
  8. Baby, A., Mia, M. A., & Pitchay, A. A. (2024). A systematic review of financial performance in the manufacturing industry. Future Business Journal, 10(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00353-1
  9. Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273.
  10. Budiandriani, Mahfudnurnajamuddin, & Syahnur, M. H. (2023). How capital structure, liquidity, and profitability affect company value (intervening variables studies on food and beverage sub-sector manufacturing companies on IDX). Enrichment: Journal of Management, 12(6), 4969–4979. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v12i6.1170
  11. Chang, K., Kang, E., & Li, Y. (2016). Effect of institutional ownership on dividends: An agency-theory-based analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2551–2559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.088
  12. Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 1–33.
  13. Dang, C., (Frank) Li, Z., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006
  14. Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177.
  15. Diaz, J. F., & Pandey, R. (2019). FACTORS AFFECTING RETURN ON ASSETS OF US TECHNOLOGY AND FINANCIAL CORPORATIONS. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 21(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.21.2.134-144
  16. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.
  17. Gerged, A. M., Beddewela, E., & Cowton, C. J. (2021). Is corporate environmental disclosure associated with firm value? A multicountry study of Gulf Cooperation Council firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2616
  18. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25, Edisi Kesembilan. In Semarang: Penerbit Undip.
  19. Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (international edition). New York: McGraw-Hills Inc.
  20. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  21. Handriani, E., & Robiyanto, R. (2018). Institutional ownership, independent board, board size, and firm performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Contaduría y Administración, 64(3), 118. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2018.1849
  22. Hearn, B., Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2023). The influence of business groups on board composition in offshore financial multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 32(3), 102084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102084
  23. Huang, K., Li, Y., Oyewale, K., & Tworoger, E. (2025). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from America’s Best Corporate Citizens. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13030119
  24. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  25. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance (pp. 77–132). Gower.
  26. Kurnia, L., Saifi, M., & Damayanti, C. R. (2024). Corporate governance dynamics: How audit committees and board characteristics influence firm value through audit report lag? JEMA: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 21(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.31106/jema.v21i1.21790
  27. Miao, M., Khan, M. I., Ghauri, S. P., & Zaman, S. I. (2023). The effect of corporate governance on firm performance: perspectives from an emerging market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2277275
  28. Prekazi, Y., Bajrami, R., & Hoxha, A. (2023). The impact of capital structure on financial performance. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, 17(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.33094/ijaefa.v17i1.1002
  29. Putri, I. A. J., Budiyanto, & Triyonowati. (2023). Financial Performance and Firm Value: The Role of Signaling Theory. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 11(04), 4776–4783. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v11i04.em01
  30. Rompotis, G. G. (2024). Financial performance and cash flow: Evidence from the US banking industry. Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 8(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.18559/ref.2024.1.1042
  31. Salsabila, R., Perwitasari, A. W., Sari, L. R., Alfina, A., & Cahyono, H. (2024). The Effect of Working Capital Management and Credit Management Policy on Financial Performance of Banking Companies Listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2019 -2022. Proceedings of Forum Manajemen Indonesia’s International Conferences, (1), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.47747/fmiic.v1i1.2177
  32. Savitri, A., & Pinem, D. Br. (2022). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan dan Nilai Pasar terhadap Harga Saham: Studi pada Perusahaan yang Secara Konsisten Terdaftar sebagai Indeks LQ45 Selama 2020-2021. Studi Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 2(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.35912/sakman.v2i1.1651
  33. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
  34. Shaffer, J. P. (1991). The Gauss-Markov Theorem and Random Regressors. The American Statistician, 45(4), 269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684451
  35. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
  36. Sidauruk, T. D., & Putri, N. T. P. (2022). Pengaruh Komisaris Independen, Karakter Eksekutif, Profitabiltas dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Tax Avoidance. Studi Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 2(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.35912/sakman.v2i1.1498
  37. Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
  38. Suriyanti, S., Sakka, N. A., & Syahnur, M. H. (2022). Determinasi Nilai Perusahaan oleh Profitabilitas dan Leverage (Pada Sektor Perusahaan Telekomunikasi di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015-2019). Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis Indonesia, 8(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.32528/jmbi.v8i2.8526
  39. Widodo, A., & Salam, T. A. I. (2024). Pengaruh Komisaris Independen dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Vokasi (SNAV) XII, 12, 182–189.
  40. Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory econometrics a modern approach. South-Western cengage learning.
  41. Zainal, A., Ritonga, A. N. A., Putra, P. D., Harahap, K., & Thohiri, R. (2024). Do Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Independent Commissioners and Audit Committees Affect Earnings Persistence of Listed Manufacturing Companies Listed in Indonesia? IJBE (Integrated Journal of Business and Economics), 8(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.33019/ijbe.v8i2.893
  42. Zhang, Y., Wei, Y., & Zhou, G. (2018). Promoting firms’ energy-saving behavior: The role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack. Energy Policy, 115, 230–238.
  43. Zhou, J., Mavondo, F. T., & Saunders, S. G. (2019). The relationship between marketing agility and financial performance under different levels of market turbulence. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.11.008