Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores contemporary perspectives on organizational behavior, focusing on leadership, organizational culture, employee motivation, and diversity and inclusion. By examining these elements, the research provides a comprehensive understanding of their impact on organizational effectiveness.


Research Design and Methodology: A qualitative literature review was conducted to synthesize existing research on organizational behavior. Scholarly articles, books, and reports were reviewed, focusing on theoretical frameworks and empirical studies on leadership styles, cultural dynamics, motivational factors, and inclusive practices.


Findings and Discussion: The review highlights the significance of transformational leadership in enhancing employee engagement and performance. Influential organizational culture, characterized by shared values and norms, is critical in shaping behavior and promoting innovation. Employee motivation, influenced by intrinsic and extrinsic factors, is crucial for productivity and satisfaction. Diversity and inclusion contribute to creativity and problem-solving, improving organizational outcomes. However, challenges such as unconscious bias and systemic barriers need to be addressed to foster genuinely inclusive environments.


Implications: Integrating insights from organizational behavior research into practice can enhance leadership effectiveness, cultural alignment, and employee motivation. Organizations should invest in leadership development, promote a positive and adaptive culture, and implement diversity and inclusion initiatives. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies and interdisciplinary approaches to address emerging trends and complexities in organizational behavior.

Keywords

Organizational Behavior Diversity; Inclusion Organizational Culture Employee Motivation Diversity and Inclusion

Article Details

How to Cite
Prasetya, E. (2024). Exploring Contemporary Perspectives in Organizational Behavior Research. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 2(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v2i1.239

References

  1. Ashkanasy, N. M., Härtel, C. E. J., & Zerbe, W. J. (2000). Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory, and practice. Quorum Books.
  2. Bal, P. M., & Dóci, E. (2019). Mainstreaming diversity and equality in European organizations: A comparative overview. European Management Journal, 37(3), 257-266.
  3. Bal, P. M., & Dóci, E. (2019). The gig economy and the future of work: Introduction to the special issue. Human Resource Management, 58(6), 609-617.
  4. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
  5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
  6. Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Ramaswamy, S., Chui, M., Allas, T., Dahlström, P., ... & Henke, N. (2017). Artificial intelligence: The next digital frontier? McKinsey Global Institute.
  7. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45-56.
  9. Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827-847.
  10. Cox, T., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45-56.
  11. Cox, T., Lobel, S., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827-847.
  12. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
  13. Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Saguy, T. (2008). Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity. European Review of Social Psychology, 19(1), 296-330.
  15. Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2013). Creating the best workplace on earth. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 74-82.
  16. Greenwood, M., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Sage Publications.
  17. Greenwood, M., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Sage Publications.
  18. Hewlett, S. A., Marshall, M., & Sherbin, L. (2013). How diversity can drive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 91(12), 30-30.
  19. Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(46), 16385-16389.
  20. Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589-617.
  21. Kossek, E. E., & Lobel, S. A. (1996). Managing diversity: Human resource strategies for transforming the workplace. Blackwell Business.
  22. Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. Free Press.
  23. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass.
  24. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402-433.
  26. Nishii, L. H., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412–1426.
  27. O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (2014). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
  28. Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton University Press.
  29. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
  30. Rock, D., & Grant, H. (2016). Why diverse teams are smarter. Harvard Business Review, 94(11), 2.
  31. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
  32. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. John Wiley & Sons.
  33. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  34. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
  35. Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  36. Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  37. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (Eds.). (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Sage Publications.
  38. Thomas, D. A. (1990). Cultural diversity and work group effectiveness: An experimental study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(3), 398–410.
  39. Thomas, D. A., & Gabarro, J. J. (2017). Breaking through the bamboo ceiling: Career strategies for Asians. Harvard Business Review Press.
  40. Thomas, D. A., & Gabarro, J. J. (2017). Breaking through: The making of minority executives in corporate America. Harvard Business Press.