Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 32 Download : 15

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the challenges in measuring social and environmental impacts in green investment and sustainable finance, with a focus on methodological inconsistencies, data quality, and the application of sustainability standards. It also explores the gap between theoretical frameworks and their practical implementation in corporate sustainability reporting.


Research Method: The research employed a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to synthesize existing studies and identify recurring challenges in impact assessment methodologies. The SLR integrated theoretical perspectives, such as stakeholder and legitimacy theories, to connect the findings to established frameworks, highlighting their practical limitations in real-world applications.


Results and Discussion: The study revealed significant inconsistencies in the methodologies used for impact measurement, including the limitations of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Issues with data quality, such as reliance on self-reported data without adequate third-party verification, compromised the reliability of sustainability claims. Additionally, varying and ambiguous sustainability standards were shown to create confusion and potential greenwashing. The findings highlight the disparity between theoretical frameworks and their practical application, which undermines stakeholder trust and organizational legitimacy.


Implications: This research contributes to academic knowledge by providing an integrated view of current challenges in sustainability impact measurement. It recommends adopting mixed-methods approaches and advanced technologies, such as blockchain, to improve transparency and reliability in sustainability reporting. The study suggests that aligning methodologies with comprehensive theoretical frameworks can enhance corporate practices and bolster stakeholder confidence in sustainability claims.

Keywords

impact measurement sustainability reporting green investment data quality methodological challenges

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Djafar, D., Tabsir, M. K., Rachmawaty, R., Djabir, M., & Pratiwi Ar, D. (2025). Analysis of Social and Environmental Impact Measurement Difficulties in Green Investment and Sustainable Finance. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 3(3), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v3i3.610
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adelakun, B. O., Antwi, B. O., Ntiakoh, A., & Eziefule, A. O. (2024). Leveraging AI for sustainable accounting: Developing models for environmental impact assessment and reporting. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(6), 1017–1048. https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v6i6.1234
  2. An, Y., & Madni, G. R. (2023). Factors Affecting Green Investment and Assessing the Sustainable Performance of Firms in China. PLoS One, 18(12), e0296099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296099
  3. Bax, K., Broccardo, E., & Paterlini, S. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance factors and financial returns: what is the relationship? Investigating environmental, social, and governance factor models. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 66, 101398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101398
  4. Becchetti, L., Cordella, M., & Morone, P. (2022). Measuring investments' progress in ecological transition: The Green Investment Financial Tool (GIFT) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, 131915. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131915
  5. Bennett, M., James, P., & Klinkers, L. (2017). Sustainable measures: Evaluation and reporting of environmental and social performance. Routledge.
  6. Bhutta, U. S., Tariq, A., Farrukh, M., Raza, A., & Iqbal, M.K. (2022). Green bonds for sustainable development: Review of literature on development and impact of green bonds. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121378
  7. Bose, S. (2020). Evolution of ESG Reporting Frameworks BT - Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting (D. C. Esty & T. Cort (eds.); pp. 13–33). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6_2
  8. Bouchmel, I., Ftiti, Z., Louhich, W., & Omri, A. (2024). Financing sources, green investment, and environmental performance: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Environmental Management, 353, 120230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120230
  9. Busco, C., Consolandi, C., Eccles, R. G., & Sofra, E. (2020). A preliminary analysis of SASB reporting: Disclosure topics, financial relevance, and the financial intensity of ESG materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 32(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12411
  10. Chen, H., Yan, B., Fei, R., & Bao, S. (2023). Assessing the impact of trade policy uncertainty on pollution emissions: an analysis of Chinese firms’ green transformation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(47), 104577–104591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29778-x
  11. Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3740–3762. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2837
  12. Czinkota, M., Kaufmann, H. R., & Basile, G. (2014). The relationship between legitimacy, reputation, sustainability, and branding for companies and their supply chains. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.10.005
  13. Dempere, J., Alamash, E., & Mattos, P. (2024). Unveiling the truth: greenwashing in sustainable finance. Frontiers in Sustainability, 5, 1362051. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2024.1362051
  14. Desalegn, G., & Tangl, A. (2022). Enhancing green finance for inclusive green growth: A systematic approach. Sustainability, 14(12), 7416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127416
  15. Dmuchowski, P., Dmuchowski, W., Baczewska-Dąbrowska, A. H., & Gworek, B. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) model; impacts and sustainable investment – Global trends and Poland’s perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117023. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117023
  16. Eyre, B., Bonilla, O., Brightman, M., & Voicu, S. (2024). Beyond the ‘tyranny of metrics’? Indicator literacy in sustainable finance. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie. https://doi.org/10.1111/tesg.12625
  17. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
  18. Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder theory: Learning from each other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 7–15.
  19. Fu, J. (2000). Institutions and investments: foreign direct investment in China during an era of reforms. University of Michigan Press.
  20. Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Performance Measurement for Green Supply Chain Management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(4), 330–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770510609015
  21. Hunjra, A. I., Hassan, M. K., Zaied, Y. Ben, & Managi, S. (2023). Nexus between green finance, environmental degradation, and sustainable development: Evidence from developing countries. Resources Policy, 81, 103371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103371
  22. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2010). Corporate social strategy: Stakeholder engagement and competitive advantage. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Joshipura, M., Mathur, S., & Kedia, N. (2024). Sustainable investing and financing for sustainable development: A hybrid review. Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2912
  24. Kelling, N. K., Sauer, P. C., Gold, S., & Seuring, S. (2021). The Role of Institutional Uncertainty for Social Sustainability of Companies and Supply Chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(4), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04423-6
  25. Lashitew, A. A. (2021). Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change? Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00092-4
  26. Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2018). Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 168–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.018
  27. Meiden, C., & Silaban, A. (2023). Exploring the Measurement of Environmental Performance in Alignment with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): A Qualitative Study. Exploring the Measurement of Environmental Performance in Alignment with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): Information Sciences Letters, 12(9), 2287–2297.
  28. Meng, X., & Shaikh, G. M. (2023). Evaluating environmental, social, and governance criteria and green finance investment strategies using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS. Sustainability, 15(8), 6786. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086786
  29. Mostafa Hamdy, & Hassan Qassem. (2024). A Framework for Integrating Data Architecture and Security Mechanisms in Multi-Domain Environments: Addressing Efficiency, Analytical Rigor, and Decision-Making Accuracy. International Journal of Information Technologies and Artificial Intelligence, 8(8 SE-Articles), 42–54.
  30. Nilashi, M., Keng Boon, O., Tan, G., Lin, B., & Abumalloh, R. (2023). Challenges in Measuring the Performance of Sustainable Development Goals: Solutions and the Role of Big Data Analytics. Harvard Data Science Review, 5(3), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.545db2cf
  31. Nishitani, K., Haider, M. B., & Kokubu, K. (2020). Are third-party assurances preferable to third-party comments for promoting financial accountability in environmental reporting? Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119199
  32. Nofel, M., Marzouk, M., Elbardan, H., Saleh, R., & Mogahed, A. (2024). From sensors to standardized financial reports: A proposed automated accounting system integrating IoT, Blockchain, and XBRL. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(10), 445.
  33. Oikonomou, I., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2014). The effects of corporate social performance on the cost of corporate debt and credit ratings. Financial Review, 49(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12025
  34. Parris, D. L., Dapko, J. L., Arnold, R. W., & Arnold, D. (2016). Exploring transparency: a new framework for responsible business management. Management Decision, 54(1), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2015-0279
  35. Rasoulinezhad, E., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Role of green finance in improving energy efficiency and renewable energy development. Energy Efficiency, 15(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-022-10021-4
  36. Sridharan, V. (2018). Bridging the disclosure gap: investor perspectives on environmental, social & governance (ESG) disclosures. Social & Governance (ESG) Disclosures (May 11, 2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3180412
  37. Stoelhorst, J. W., & Vishwanathan, P. (2024). Beyond primacy: A stakeholder theory of corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 49(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0268
  38. Ulum, M. C., & Ngindana, R. (2017). Environmental Governance: Isu Kebijakan dan Tata Kelola Lingkungan Hidup. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
  39. Venkatesh, V. G., Kang, K., Wang, B., Zhong, R. Y., & Zhang, A. (2020). System architecture for blockchain-based transparency in supply chain social sustainability. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 63, 101896. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101896
  40. Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 5512–5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095512
  41. Wilmshurst, T. D., & Frost, G. R. (2000). Corporate environmental reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570010316126