Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the effect of self-efficacy and task-relevant budgetary participation on managerial performance while analyzing the mediating role of transformational leadership among MSMEs in Dompu Regency.


Research Method: An explanatory quantitative design was employed. Data were collected via questionnaires from 126 managers of halal-certified MSMEs, selected through purposive sampling. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was utilized for data analysis.


Results and Discussion: The findings reveal that self-efficacy and task-relevant budgetary participation have no direct significant impact on managerial performance. However, transformational leadership successfully and significantly mediates both relationships. This proves that individual psychological potential and participative budgeting processes require a visionary leader to be converted into actual managerial effectiveness.


Implications: MSME stakeholders and policymakers should prioritize transformational leadership development programs rather than merely focusing on technical administrative training to optimize resource management and operational efficiency.


Originality: This research highlights transformational leadership as an indispensable catalyst that bridges cognitive factors and participative control systems within the resource-constrained ecosystem of developing regional MSMEs.

Keywords

self-efficacy budgetary participation transformational leadership managerial performance MSMEs

Article Details

How to Cite
Safitri, N. A., Mahmud, M., & Ramadhan, R. A. (2026). Self-Efficacy and Task-Relevant Budgetary Participation on Managerial Performance through Transformational Leadership Style. Advances in Management & Financial Reporting, 4(3), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.60079/amfr.v4i3.992

References

  1. Adhar, Mahmud, & Asmawati. (2025). Peran Self-efficacy Dalam Membentuk Commitment Organizational Melalui Employee Engagement pada CV. Aquaku Jaya Bersama. YUME : Journal of Management, 8(1), 1409–1421. https://doi.org/10.37531/yum.v8i1.8650
  2. Alimuna, R. F., R, A. C. F., & Nurmin. (2026). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business (RIGGS), 5(1), 4274–4280. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.5699
  3. Amanda, N. (2026). Penerapan Gaya Kepemimpinan Untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Karyawan Pada Koperasi Serba Usaha Harapan Baru Kabupaten Dompu. BERNIAGA : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 1(2). https://jurnal.mnwtambora.com/niaga/article/view/6
  4. Avolio, et al., (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Yair Berson. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
  7. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership (2nd ed.). In Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135618896
  8. Brownell, P., & Chenhall, R. H. (1988). The Effect of Participative Budgeting on Job Satisfaction and Performance: Role Ambiguity as an Intervening Variable. Accounting Organizations and Society, 13(3), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(88)90001-3
  9. Cohen. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  10. Fatimah, A., & Wahidahwati. (2020). PENGARUH PARTISIPASI ANGGARAN TERHADAP KINERJA MANAJERIAL. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 8(9). https://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/2556
  11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
  12. Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS.
  13. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  14. Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Institute for Management Research, 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
  15. Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia. (2023). Perkembangan Data Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Menengah (UMKM) dan Usaha Besar (UB) Tahun 2022-2023. Jakarta: Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM RI.
  16. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.705
  17. Mahmud, Soetjipto, B. E., Mukhlis, I., & Sopiah. (2024). Workplace Spirituality, Organizational Culture, and Employee Performance in Indonesian MSMEs: Examining the Mediating Roles of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(7), 362–394. https://doi.org/10.33168/jliss.2024.0719
  18. Mahmud, & Sopiah. (2022). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan: Literatur Review. Syntax Literate, 7(8.5.2017), 2003–2005. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i3.6459
  19. Mahmud, Subhan, E. S., & Paroli. (2025). The Influence of Transformational Leadership Style and Organisational Culture on Employee Performance Mediated by Organisational Commitment. Mix: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 15(3), 771–795. https://doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2025.v15i3.006
  20. Mahmud, Wati, E. K., Subhan, E. S., & Irwansyah (2023). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Religiusitas, Dan Lingkungan Kerja Fisik Terhadap Kinerja. 1–12. http://eprints.universitasputrabangsa.ac.id/id/eprint/843/%0Ahttp://eprints.universitasputrabangsa.ac.id/id/eprint/843/1/Jurnal Siti Ngaisah Fix.pdf
  21. Oktaviyah, N. (2022). Penyusunan Anggaran Operasional pada Umkm Kuliner di Kabupaten Maros. BIJAC: Bata Ilyas Journal of Accounting, 3(2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.37531/bijak.v3i2.2948
  22. Rakasiwi, F. (2024). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Percaya Diri , Desentralisasi , dan Budaya Organisasi sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Multidisiplin West Science, 03(02), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.58812/jmws.v3i02.997
  23. Refa, Y., & Anisah, H. U. (2024). Peran Efikasi Diri Dan Kompetensi Entrepreneur Terhadap Kinerja Umkm Dengan Komitmen Entrepreneur Sebagai Variabel Mediasi (Studi Pada Food Court Di Kota Banjarmasin). Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi (JEMSI), 6(1), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.38035/jemsi.v6i1.2752
  24. Robbins, & Judge. (2022). Organizational Behavior. Pearson Education.
  25. Salfarini, E. M., Atlantika, Y. N., Beni, S., & Sari, M. (2025). Pengaruh Minat Wirausaha dan Self-efficacy terhadap Kinerja UMKM di Bengkayang. Jurnal Literasi Bisnis, 14, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v14i1.1298
  26. Schwarzer, Ralf, Warner, & Perceived, L. M. (2013). Perceived Self-Efficacy and Its Relationship to Resilience. The Springer Series on Human Exceptionality, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3
  27. Shields, J. F., & Shields, M. D. (1998). Antecedents of Participative Budgeting. Accounting, Organization and Society, 23(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00014-7
  28. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
  29. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
  30. Suta, I. M. A., & Sutriani, I. A. N. (2025). Analisis Beban Kerja Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Produktivitas Karyawan : Studi Kualitatif Pada Pt Tunas Jaya Sanur Cabang Regional Mataram. Jurnal Manajemen Terapan Dan Keuangan (Mankeu), Vol. 14(04), 1599–1612. https://doi.org/10.22437/jmk.v14i04.49287
  31. Utama, E. Y., & Rohman, A. (2013). Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial : Komitmen Organisasi Dan Persepsi Inovasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2, 1–12.
  32. Wiratno, A., Ningsih, W., & Putri, N. K. (2016). Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Komitmen Organisasi, Motivasi, Dan Struktur Desentralisasi Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi, XX(01), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v20i1.81
  33. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive Theory Organizational Management. Academy of Management, 14(3), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4279067
  34. Yanti, A. (2019). Pengaruh Pendidikan Kewirausahaan, Self-efficacy, Locus of Control, dan Karakter Wirausaha terhadap Minat Berwirausaha. Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, 2(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.30596/maneggio.v2i2.3774
  35. Zainuddin, A. (2020). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran terhadap Kinerja Manajerial dengan Komitmen Organisasi dan Job-Relevant Information sebagai Variabel Moderating. BIJAC: Bata Ilyas Journal of Accounting, 1(225), 61–77.
  36. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-Efficacy : An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016