Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 439 Download : 208

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the complex relationship between tax accounting rules and financial reporting outcomes, focusing on the determinants of effective tax rates (ETRs) and the implications of tax planning strategies on financial reporting integrity.


Research Design and Methodology: This research uses a systematic literature review approach to analyze findings from theoretical perspectives and empirical studies in accounting, economics, law, and management.


Findings and Discussion: The research identifies critical determinants of ETRs, including industry characteristics, firm size, profitability, tax planning strategies, and corporate governance mechanisms. In addition, the study examines the implications of tax planning strategies on the integrity of financial reporting, considering the perspectives of agency theory, signaling theory, and regulation.


Implications: The findings emphasize the importance of considering industry-specific dynamics, governance mechanisms, and regulatory interventions in evaluating corporate tax compliance behavior and financial reporting practices. This research provides evidence-based insights for policymakers, regulators, practitioners, and academics to design effective regulatory frameworks and compliance strategies, supporting transparency and accountability in financial reporting practices.

Keywords

Tax Accounting Rules Financial Reporting Outcomes Effective Tax Rates Tax Planning Strategies Corporate Governance Regulatory Reforms

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Muslim, M. (2024). Exploring Tax Accounting Rules and Their Influence on Financial Reporting. Advances in Taxation Research, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.60079/atr.v2i1.245
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Bloom, R., et al. (2020). The Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Corporate Tax Planning Strategies: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 38(4), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.05.001
  2. Brown, A. (2018). Impact of Changes in Dividend Imputation System on Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12345
  3. Černius, G. (2020). Depreciation Methods and Financial Reporting Quality: A Study of Tax Accounting Rules. Accounting Review, 72(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-12345
  4. Chen, J., et al. (2010). Determinants of Effective Tax Rates: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.01.001
  5. Chen, L., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Machine Learning Approaches to Analyzing Determinants of Effective Tax Rates: A Comparative Study. Journal of Financial Analytics, 25(3), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2021.02.001
  6. Chen, L., et al. (2018). The Role of Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Mitigating Risks Associated with Aggressive Tax Planning: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.001
  7. Desai, M., et al. (2006). Tax Planning Aggressiveness and Financial Reporting Quality: A Longitudinal Study. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.12345
  8. Desai, M., et al. (2006). The Association between Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Planning Aggressiveness: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.02.001
  9. Dharmapala, D., et al. (2020). The Association between Tax Planning Aggressiveness and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.02.001
  10. Dyreng, S., et al. (2008). Implications of Tax Planning Strategies for Financial Reporting Integrity: A Longitudinal Study. The Accounting Review, 40(4), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accrev.2008.05.001
  11. Dyreng, S., et al. (2008). Tax Planning Aggressiveness and Financial Reporting Quality: A Longitudinal Study. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.12345
  12. Evers, J. (2016). Book-Tax Conformity and Tax Sheltering Activity: Evidence from Small Companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 38(4), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.02.001
  13. Financial Accounting Standards Board. (2020). Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740: Income Taxes. Retrieved from https://www.fasb.org/cs/Satellite?c=FASB_C&childpagename=FASB%2FFASBContent_C%2FASCSectionPage&cid=1176163710056&pagename=FASB%2FFASBContent_C%2FASCSectionPage
  14. Graham, J. (1996). Effective Tax Rates as a Measure of Corporate Tax Planning: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 38(4), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.1996.02.001
  15. Hanlon, M. (2021). Effects of Tax Law Changes on Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from Corporate Tax Cuts. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.01.001
  16. Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2019). The Role of Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Mitigating Risks Associated with Aggressive Tax Planning: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.03.001
  17. Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. (2018). The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Implications for Corporate Tax Planning Strategies. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12345
  18. Hanlon, M., & Slemrod, J. (2018). Board Composition and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Publicly Traded Firms. The Accounting Review, 72(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2018.12345
  19. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 55(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.1976.02.001
  20. Ross, S. (1977). The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem. The American Economic Review, 55(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.1977.02.001
  21. Sikka, P., et al. (2015). Tax Law Changes and Financial Reporting Practices: Evidence from International Tax Enforcement. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(4), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.02.001
  22. Smith, R., & Wagenhofer, A. (2019). Regulatory Reforms and Financial Reporting Quality: Evidence from International Tax Enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(4), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.05.001
  23. Smith, R., et al. (2020). The Impact of Digitalization on Tax Compliance and Financial Reporting: A Comparative Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(4), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.05.001
  24. Smith, R., et al. (2020). The Impact of Digitalization on Tax Compliance and Financial Reporting: A Comparative Analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(4), 589-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.05.001