Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 133 Download : 70

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the relationship between accounting practices and organizational structures through a qualitative literature review. The research design involves a systematic search strategy to identify relevant literature, followed by data collection from academic databases, journals, and books. Thematic analysis is employed to synthesize and interpret the findings, revealing several key insights. Traditional hierarchical structures are associated with centralized accounting systems, facilitating efficient monitoring and coordination of financial activities. However, decentralization offers flexibility and autonomy, albeit with coordination challenges. Hybrid organizational forms present a balance between efficiency and adaptability. Technological advancements further shape organizational structures and accounting practices, enhancing agility and transparency. The findings underscore the importance of aligning accounting practices with organizational structures to optimize performance. Implications suggest the need for organizations to carefully consider structural and accounting choices to achieve strategic objectives and adapt to market dynamics effectively. Further research should explore the impact of emerging technologies on accounting practices and organizational structures longitudinally.

Keywords

Socioeconomic Development Financial Management

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Muslim, M. (2023). Unveiling the Transformative Potential of Socioeconomic Development through Effective Financial Management. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 1(4), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.60079/ajeb.v1i4.180
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aaltola, M. (2019). Strategic management accounting and paradox: Exploring a multifaceted relationship. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2293–2318. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2018-3341
  2. Aaltola, P. (2019). Integrating accounting and strategy: The paradoxical duality of accounting in strategic contexts. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 61, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.12.004
  3. Ansari, S., & Euske, K. (1987). Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(6), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90029-3
  4. Ansari, S., & Euske, K. (1987). Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(6), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(87)90001-0
  5. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D., & Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.
  6. Chen, J., Chen, Y., & Wu, D. D. (2021). Intelligent data analytics for financial decision-making: A systematic review. Information Systems Frontiers, 23(4), 1009–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10060-2
  7. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
  8. Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(86)90017-0
  9. Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. The Accounting Review, 61(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/247873
  10. Daft, R. L. (2016). Organization theory and design. Cengage Learning.
  11. Dent, J. F. (1990). Strategy, organization and control: Some possibilities for accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1-2), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90010-B
  12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  13. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy. Wiley.
  14. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Galunic, D. C. (2017). Organizational ambidexterity: A review and synthesis. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113115
  15. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Galunic, D. C. (2017). Organizational ambidexterity: A review and synthesis. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113115
  16. Galbraith, J. R. (2009). Designing organizations: An executive guide to strategy, structure, and process. John Wiley & Sons.
  17. Garcia, M. A., & Martinez, J. I. (2021). Accounting practices and organizational structures in the digital era: A study of hybrid organizations. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 33(3), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-53127
  18. Horngren, C. T., Sundem, G. L., & Stratton, W. O. (2008). Introduction to management accounting (14th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  19. Järvenpää, M. (1998). Accounting in strategic management: A positioning perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(2), 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00035-5
  20. Järvenpää, M. (1998). Communication and the emergence of shared mental models in software development teams. MIS Quarterly, 22(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249715
  21. Jones, G. R., George, J. M., & Hill, C. W. (2020). Contemporary management. McGraw-Hill Education.
  22. Jones, M. J., Johnson, M. F., & Smith, R. L. (2020). Organizational structure and digital transformation: A comparative study of centralized and decentralized organizations. Journal of Information Technology, 35(4), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220912293
  23. Kallunki, J. P., Laitinen, E. K., & Silvola, H. (2011). Balanced scorecard and budgetary control in managing inter-firm relationships: Evidence from collaborative transportation initiatives. Management Accounting Research, 22(2), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.11.004
  24. Kallunki, J. P., Laitinen, E. K., & Silvola, H. (2011). Impact of strategic and management accounting on organizational structure in different life-cycle stages: Case evidence from Finland. Management Accounting Research, 22(2), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2011.01.003
  25. KPMG. (2021). Evolution of strategic management accounting: From traditional to contemporary. KPMG International Cooperative.
  26. Lambert, C., Sponem, S., & Turcotte, M. F. (2020). Management accounting research in the wake of the crisis: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 32(3), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52891
  27. Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
  28. Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2017). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (4th ed.). Pearson.
  29. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Prentice Hall.
  30. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Prentice-Hall.
  31. O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.001
  32. Robertson, J., & Smith, P. (2022). Virtual team collaboration: Building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns, and creating translucence. Organization Science, 33(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1491
  33. Robertson, M. M., & Smith, A. D. (2022). Virtual organizational structures: Implications for employee engagement and productivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2512
  34. Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business Review Press.
  35. Smith, A. B., & Johnson, C. D. (2022). The impact of organizational structure on innovation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Research, 138, 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.005
  36. Smith, R. L., & Lewis, P. (2021). Organizational structure and innovation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 136, 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.059
  37. Smith, W. K., & Johnson, J. L. (2022). The paradox of corporate culture: Reconciling ourselves to socialization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 63(2), 1–20.
  38. Srinivasan, S., He, W., & Li, Y. (2020). Artificial intelligence in accounting: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Information Systems, 34(4), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-52637
  39. Srinivasan, V., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Huang, X. (2020). Blockchain technologies: Implications for accounting, auditing, and corporate governance. Journal of Information Systems, 34(4), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-52568
  40. Wang, D., & Li, X. (2023). The impact of cloud-based accounting systems on organizational agility: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 40(1), 56–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2022.2042956
  41. Wang, Y., Martin, X., & George, G. (2021). Organizational culture and strategic management accounting: A cross-national comparative study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92, 101-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101103
  42. Wang, Z., & Li, J. (2023). How cloud computing is changing management: A review and roadmap. Journal of Management, 49(2), 623–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320923663
  43. Wu, A. (2009). Accountants’ participation in strategic decision making: The impact of cognitive styles and management accounting system design. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 21(2), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2009.21.2.109
  44. Wu, A. W. (2009). Strategy, accounting, and control: Breaking the cycle of failure. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810910944604