Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 342 Download : 224

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the intricate interplay between transparency, accountability, and corruption within contemporary governance systems. Employing a multidisciplinary approach, the research design incorporates empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks from diverse fields to elucidate the complex dynamics of this nexus. Methodologically, the study synthesizes existing literature and conducts comparative analyses to identify key patterns and insights regarding the effectiveness of transparency-enhancing measures and accountability mechanisms in combating corruption. The findings underscore a compelling association between increased transparency and reduced levels of corruption, highlighting the pivotal role of robust accountability structures in ensuring integrity within governance systems. Implications of the study extend to both academic scholarship and practical policymaking, emphasizing the importance of adopting a holistic approach that integrates transparency and accountability measures to effectively address corruption challenges. Key implications include the need for tailored interventions that consider contextual factors, such as institutional quality and societal norms, and the imperative of leveraging technological innovations and social mobilization to empower citizens and confront corruption. This study contributes to advancing our understanding of governance dynamics and informs evidence-based strategies for promoting transparency, strengthening accountability, and combating corruption in diverse contexts.

Keywords

Transparency Accountability Corruption Governance Empirical Evidence

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Muslim, M., & Mais, R. G. (2023). The Interplay between Transparency, Accountability, and Corruption: A Contemporary Discourse. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 1(6), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.60079/ajeb.v1i6.268
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2018). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198796954.001.0001
  2. Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2014). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804789619.001.0001
  3. Banfield, E. C. (2019). Corruption as a feature of social organization. In Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's snuff box to Citizens United (pp. 11-23). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674976709-002
  4. Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12066
  5. Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2002). The political economy of government responsiveness: Theory and evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1415–1451. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935025
  6. Brusca, I. (2018). Transparency, budgetary management, and audit systems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 519-533. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy002
  7. Chêne, M., & Domingo, P. (2020). The implementation of participatory budgeting: Lessons from participatory processes in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-3
  8. Davis, K. E., & Törő, C. (2018). Globalization and governance: Introduction to the special issue. Governance, 31(4), 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12365
  9. Davis, K. E., & Törő, C. (2018). Globalization and governance: Introduction to the special issue. Governance, 31(4), 607-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12365
  10. Djankov, S., McLiesh, C., & Nenova, T. (2008). Whose bribes are more? Journal of Public Economics, 92(12), 2067–2081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.03.001
  11. Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (2021). Bureaucratic corruption, interconnected markets, and anti-corruption policy. In M. Hafner-Burton & T. Victor (Eds.), Politics, power, and pathways: The quest for sustainable energy (pp. 97-120). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108764809.005
  12. Fox, J., & Gurin, D. (2019). Transparency and accountability initiatives. In M. E. Hawkesworth & L. O. Kruke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political science (pp. 429-450). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.21
  13. Grindle, M. S. (2017). Public authority in crisis: Authority without credibility, credibility without authority. Governance, 30(1), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12247
  14. Heywood, P. M. (2021). Understanding political corruption. In P. Heywood & J. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of political corruption (pp. 3-18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351244351-1
  15. Johnston, M. (2015). Active and sustainable reform constituencies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716215579460
  16. Johnston, M., & Heywood, P. M. (2015). Toward active and sustainable reform constituencies. In P. M. Heywood & M. Johnston (Eds.), The routine of corruption in Ireland: And how to deal with it (pp. 19-42). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442671949-003
  17. Lindstedt, C. (2006). Education, free press, and free and fair elections. Crime, Law and Social Change, 45(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9026-0
  18. Lyrio, M. (2018). Citizen participation in the control of public actors. Public Integrity, 20(6), 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1480193
  19. Margetts, H. (2019). Political transparency and the roles of digital media. In L. Bennett & R. Segerberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of digital politics (pp. 297-314). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.015
  20. Méndez, F., & Simpser, A. (2016). Vertical accountability and the polity. Comparative Political Studies, 49(8), 1055–1085. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016630453
  21. Miceli, M. P., & Near, J. P. (2020). Whistle-blowing: A survey of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005710300247
  22. Mulgan, R. (2020). Accountability in government and the 21st-century public sector. Governance, 33(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12376
  23. Persson, T., Roland, G., & Tabellini, G. (2015). Electoral rules and government spending in parliamentary democracies. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(4), 1653–1702. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv021
  24. Prichard, W., MacLeod, M., & Boucher, G. (2021). Comparative integrity commissions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz008
  25. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803975
  26. Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226729571.001.0001
  27. Schillemans, T., & Bovens, M. (2011). The challenges of public accountability: A response to recent contributions. Public Management Review, 13(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.482696
  28. Sieberer, U. (2020). Organized crime, corruption, and democratic accountability. Perspectives on Politics, 18(4), 1020-1037. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720000592
  29. Smith, R., Marsden, C. T., & McCarthy, D. M. (2021). Blockchain for global supply chain integrity. In D. L. Olson, D. Delen, & E. Batra (Eds.), Decision sciences and technology for effective supply chain management (pp. 235-256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67508-1_10
  30. Svensson, J. (2017). Experimentation in the fight against corruption. The World Bank Research Observer, 32(2), 133-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx002
  31. Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211–244. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.081205.095418
  32. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2004). United Nations Convention against Corruption. https://doi.org/10.18356/891f16b8-en
  33. Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law: The bulging pocket makes the easy life. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810171
  34. Van Rijckeghem, C., & Weder, B. (2001). Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: Do wages in the civil service affect corruption, and by how much? Journal of Development Economics, 65(2), 307-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(01)00140-4
  35. Warren, M. E., Squire, P., & Simpser, A. (2018). Electoral malpractice. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0025