Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 485 Download : 267

Main Article Content

Abstract

The study explores contemporary audit and assurance practices within emerging global regulatory frameworks, aiming to elucidate their evolution, challenges, and implications. The purpose is to analyze the impact of international accounting and auditing standards adoption, particularly IFRS and ISAs, on audit practices and regulatory landscapes. Employing a systematic literature review methodology, the research synthesizes existing scholarly works to uncover patterns and trends in audit practices. Findings indicate a significant shift towards convergence in audit practices across jurisdictions due to globalization and regulatory harmonization efforts. However, challenges persist, including variations in interpretation and application of standards, as well as the need for auditors to adapt to emerging risks and technologies. The discussion highlights the role of risk-based auditing methodologies in addressing contemporary business complexities and stakeholder expectations. Implications suggest the necessity for continuous adaptation and innovation in audit practices, leveraging technology, collaboration among stakeholders, and regulatory oversight to ensure audit quality and relevance.

Keywords

International Accounting Standards Audit Practices Regulatory Frameworks Risk-based Auditing

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Susanto, E., & Kalsum, U. (2023). Audit and Assurance Practices to Emerging Global Regulatory Landscapes. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 1(5), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.60079/ajeb.v1i5.289
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abbott, L. J., DeZoort, F. T., & Haque, F. (2016). Audit committee expertise, financial reporting quality, and fraud: An empirical analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51204
  2. Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2016). Financial statement audits are more than a commodity: An analysis of unexpected fee increases. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 631-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12168
  3. Brown, J. O., & Tarca, A. (2017). International financial reporting standards: A framework-based perspective. Routledge.
  4. Brown, L. D., Issa, H., & Simon, D. T. (2020). Financial statement fraud schemes: An analysis of extended audit procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(1), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51840
  5. Brown, P., & Smith, J. (2022). The Role of Auditors in Assessing and Reporting on ESG Disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4091-2
  6. Brown, P., & Tarca, A. (2017). Politics, processes, and the future of IFRS. Accounting & Finance, 57(3), 623-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12238
  7. Brown, T., et al. (2021). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Audit Procedures: Opportunities and Challenges. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52407
  8. Chen, C. X., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in accounting and auditing: A synthesis of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 50, 101022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2020.101022
  9. Chen, L., & Wang, Q. (2023). Implementation of Risk-Based Audit Planning in Multinational Corporations: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Auditing, 37(Supplement 1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.2308/ijau-51451
  10. Chen, L., et al. (2021). Emerging Risks and Their Implications for Audit Planning: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective. Accounting Perspectives, 22(4), 487-512. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12473
  11. Chen, L., et al. (2022). Blockchain Technology in Audit: Enhancing Transparency and Integrity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(1), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51782
  12. DeZoort, F. T., et al. (2016). A Review of Archival Auditing Research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(Supplement 1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51451
  13. DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., Reed, S. A., & Shelton, S. W. (2016). Auditors' considerations of client business models and the ability to constrain aggressive financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51358
  14. Ebirim, C. (2024). The evolving landscape of corporate auditing: A focus on technological advancements and regulatory changes. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(3), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12432
  15. Gaynor, L. M., et al. (2019). Enhancing Audit Quality: The Role of Technology, Governance, and Professional Education. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52407
  16. Gaynor, L. M., McMahon, D., & Slemrod, M. (2019). Does tone at the top matter? An examination of tone at the top and middle levels of the organization. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(1), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51934
  17. Gramling, A. A., Maletta, M. J., Schneider, A., & Church, B. K. (2014). The role of the board of directors in restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 121-150. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50666
  18. Gramling, A., et al. (2014). Achieving Consistency in International Audit Standards: Challenges and Solutions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51295
  19. Grody, A. D. (2015). The expanded role of auditors in global regulatory regimes post-financial crisis. *The European
  20. Haque, F., DeZoort, F. T., & Abbott, L. J. (2020). Auditor's responsibility for detecting fraud: Does type of engagement, level of fraud risk, and firm size matter? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(2), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52632
  21. Haque, F., et al. (2020). The Role of Auditors in Assessing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Risks: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4091-2
  22. Humphrey, C. (2008). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Perspectives on the Practice of Auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 391-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.002
  23. Humphrey, C. (2008). Auditing cultures: Anthropological perspectives on the practice of auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 391-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.002
  24. Humphrey, C. (2008). Auditing research: A review across the disciplinary divide. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.06.001
  25. Johnson, M., et al. (2023). Auditor Independence and Audit Quality: Stakeholder Perceptions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 631-657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12168
  26. Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Continuous Professional Development Programs and Auditor Competence: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting Research, 57(3), 623-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12168
  27. Linsmeier, T. J., & Thornton, D. B. (2012). Market reaction to events surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(1), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50182
  28. Louwers, T. J., Ramsay, R. J., Sinason, D. H., & Strawser, J. R. (2016). Auditing and assurance services. McGraw-Hill Education.
  29. Louwers, T., et al. (2016). Convergence of International Accounting and Auditing Standards: Implications for Audit Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(Supplement 1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51451
  30. Messier, W. F., et al. (2017). Balancing Risk-Based Audit Planning and Substantive Testing: A Practical Guide. Accounting Horizons, 31(4), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52407
  31. Messier, W. F., Jr., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2017). Auditing & assurance services: A systematic approach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  32. Mock, T. J., & Turner, L. D. (2018). Business risk and the audit process: An analysis of initial audit engagements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51992
  33. Mock, T. J., et al. (2018). Audit quality indicators: A research synthesis and agenda. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(1), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51782
  34. Simnett, R. (2009). Assurance for GHG emissions disclosures: A call for international standards. Accounting Forum, 33(3), 202-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2009.04.003
  35. Simnett, R., Carson, E., & Vanstraelen, A. (2016). Auditing, assurance services and ethics in Australia. McGraw-Hill Education.
  36. Simnett, R., Carson, E., & Vanstraelen, A. (2016). International Archival Auditing and Assurance Research: Trends, Methodological Features, and Opportunities. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51295
  37. Smith, R., & Jones, S. (2024). Enhancing Audit Committee Oversight and Governance Mechanisms: Implications for Auditor Independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(2), 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4091-2
  38. Vanstraelen, A. (2019). A review of research on auditing quality. European Accounting Review, 28(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1381402
  39. Vanstraelen, A. (2019). International Audit and Assurance Standards Setters. In A Research Agenda for Global Auditing Scholarship (pp. 20-34). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  40. Zeff, S. A. (2007). Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. Accounting and Business Research, 37(sup1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2007.9730079
  41. Zeff, S. A. (2007). The evolution of U.S. auditing: The historical synthesis. Routledge.