Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 170 Download : 116

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates corporate environmental accountability through the lens of stakeholder expectations and corporate practices. It seeks to understand the dynamics driving corporations to adopt sustainable practices and how these align with stakeholder demands.


Research Design and Methodology: A qualitative case study design was employed to provide an in-depth understanding of the phenomena. The research involved semi-structured interviews with senior executives, sustainability managers, and stakeholders from various corporations. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis to identify critical patterns and themes.


Findings and Discussion: The findings highlight the significant role of stakeholder pressure in shaping corporate environmental accountability. Stakeholders, including consumers, investors, and regulatory bodies, demand transparency and accountability, driving corporations to adopt more sustainable practices. Companies facing robust stakeholder scrutiny are more likely to engage in proactive environmental strategies, integrating sustainability into their core operations and leveraging stakeholder engagement to drive innovation. The study validates legitimacy, stakeholder, and stewardship theories, demonstrating the importance of aligning corporate practices with societal values and ethical leadership in fostering a culture of accountability.


Implications: The research contributes to academic knowledge by integrating multiple theoretical frameworks to understand corporate environmental accountability. It offers actionable insights for corporate leaders to adopt proactive environmental strategies and for policymakers to create regulatory frameworks that encourage sustainable practices. The study’s limitations suggest avenues for future research, including expanding sample sizes and conducting longitudinal studies to examine the evolution of corporate environmental practices.

Keywords

Corporate Environmental Accountability Stakeholder Expectations Sustainability Practices Ethical Leadership

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Wahyuni, W., Syamsidar, S., Indasari, F., & Bualemo, L. E. G. (2024). Corporate Environmental Accountability: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholder Expectations and Corporate Practices. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 2(6), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.60079/ajeb.v2i6.352
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akor, M. (2023). Business sustainability: understanding the influence of managers and stakeholders on adopting sustainability practices in Nigerian SMEs. http://hdl.handle.net/2436/625340
  2. Alkhodary, D. (2023). Integrating sustainability into strategic management: a path towards long-term business success. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), e01627–e01627. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1627
  3. Avery, G. (2005). Leadership for sustainable futures: Achieving success in a competitive world. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  4. Bui, M. Le. (2021). Corporate Reputation and Accountability of Corporate Environmental Responsibility : Theoretical Triangulation and Conflicting Accountabilities. 8(8), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no8.0021
  5. Burke, J. J., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. (2019). The Heterogeneity of Board-Level Sustainability Committees and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(4), 1161–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3453-2
  6. Caputo, F., Pizzi, S., Ligorio, L., & Leopizzi, R. (2021). Enhancing environmental information transparency through corporate social responsibility reporting regulation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3470–3484. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2814
  7. Chen, Y., Tang, G., Jin, J., Li, J., & Paillé, P. (2015). Linking Market Orientation and Environmental Performance: The Influence of Environmental Strategy, Employee’s Environmental Involvement, and Environmental Product Quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2059-1
  8. Coleman, E. A., Manyindo, J., Parker, A. R., & Schultz, B. (2019). Stakeholder engagement increases transparency, satisfaction, and civic action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(49), 24486–24491. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.190843311
  9. Crossley, R. M., Elmagrhi, M. H., & Ntim, C. G. (2021). Sustainability and legitimacy theory: The case of sustainable social and environmental practices of small and medium‐sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3740–3762. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2837
  10. Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2307–2329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
  11. Dissanayake, K. (2021). Corporate Social Reporting and Stakeholder Accountability : A Case of A Leading It Firm Corporate Social Reporting and Stakeholder Accountability : A Case of A Leading It Firm Department of Accounting , University of Colombo , Sri Lanka. January. https://doi.org/10.35474/ibarj.v5i1.146
  12. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). the Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes. Nber Working Paper Series, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
  13. Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.
  14. Fischer, D., Brettel, M., & Mauer, R. (2020). The Three Dimensions of Sustainability: A Delicate Balancing Act for Entrepreneurs Made More Complex by Stakeholder Expectations. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4012-1
  15. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
  16. Ghassim, B., & Foss, L. (2020). How Do Leaders Embrace Stakeholder Engagement for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation? BT - New Leadership in Strategy and Communication: Shifting Perspective on Innovation, Leadership, and System Design (N. Pfeffermann (ed.); pp. 63–80). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19681-3_6
  17. Gurzawska, A. (2020). Towards Responsible and Sustainable Supply Chains – Innovation, Multi-stakeholder Approach and Governance. Philosophy of Management, 19(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-019-00114-z
  18. Herremans, I. M., Nazari, J. A., & Mahmoudian, F. (2016). Stakeholder Relationships, Engagement, and Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2634-0
  19. Hussain, S. (2023). Environmental Damage and Global Health : Understanding the Impacts and Proposing Mitigation Strategies. Journal of Big-Data Analytics and Cloud Computing, 8(2), 1–21. https://questsquare.org/index.php/JOURNALBACC/article/view/5/7
  20. Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., Bagherzadeh, M., & Singh, J. J. (2020). Co-creation: A Key Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Trust, and Customer Loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4015-y
  21. Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
  22. Kuo, F.-I., Fang, W.-T., & LePage, B. A. (2022). Proactive environmental strategies in the hotel industry: eco-innovation, green competitive advantage, and green core competence. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(6), 1240–1261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1931254
  23. Lins, K. V, Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
  24. Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Gold, S., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2019). A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12763
  25. Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., Aguilera‐Caracuel, J., & Morales‐Raya, M. (2016). Corporate governance and environmental sustainability: The moderating role of the national institutional context. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(3), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1367
  26. Payne, S. L., & Calton, J. M. (2017). Towards a managerial practice of stakeholder engagement: Developing multi-stakeholder learning dialogues. In Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 121–135). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781351281881-7/towards-managerial-practice-stakeholder-engagement-stephen-payne-jerry-calton
  27. Perego, P. M. (2005). Environmental management control. An empirical study on the use of environmental performance measures in management control systems. SI:[Sn].
  28. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2019). Creating Shared Value BT - Managing Sustainable Business: An Executive Education Case and Textbook (G. G. Lenssen & N. C. Smith (eds.); pp. 323–346). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
  29. Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., De Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner‐Ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R. K., Oughton, E. A., & Sidoli del Ceno, J. (2018). A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26, S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
  30. Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. (2022). The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, 108495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495
  31. Schaltegger, S., & Hörisch, J. (2017). In Search of the Dominant Rationale in Sustainability Management: Legitimacy- or Profit-Seeking? Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2854-3
  32. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  33. Tackie, G. (2020). Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives of Environmental Accountability Practices in the Mining Sector. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 10(4), 38. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v10i4.17945
  34. Varadarajan, R. (2017). Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0461-6
  35. Vieira Nunhes, T., Espuny, M., Lauá Reis Campos, T., Santos, G., Bernardo, M., & Oliveira, O. J. (2022). Guidelines to build the bridge between sustainability and integrated management systems: A way to increase stakeholder engagement toward sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1617–1635. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2308
  36. Yin, J. (2017). Institutional drivers for corporate social responsibility in an emerging economy: A mixed-method study of Chinese business executives. Business & Society, 56(5), 672–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315592856