Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study empirically investigates the asymmetric impacts of palm oil production, downstream industrialization, and trade openness on the ecological footprint. The primary objective is to determine whether environmental degradation responds differently to positive and negative macroeconomic shocks.


Research Method: The research employs a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag framework to analyze annual time-series data spanning 30 years. The analytical procedure involves descriptive statistics, unit root tests to confirm stationarity, nonlinear bounds testing for long-run cointegration, and short-run Granger causality tests.


Results and Discussion: The empirical findings reveal a statistically significant asymmetric relationship. A positive shock in palm oil production exacerbates environmental degradation, while a negative shock is associated with measurable ecological recovery. Furthermore, downstream industrialization marginally reduces the ecological footprint in the long run, suggesting the potential for adopting circular economy practices. Conversely, trade openness slightly increases environmental pressures, indicating a global telecoupling effect in which international demand influences domestic industrialization and upstream expansion.


Implications: To mitigate imported environmental burdens, producing nations must implement robust integrated policies. Strategic interventions, such as enforcing strict forest moratoriums, facilitating land swaps to degraded mineral soils, and accelerating sustainable certification for smallholders, are critical for achieving long-term ecological resilience.


Originality: This research breaks new ground by employing a nonlinear framework to reveal asymmetric "ecological hysteresis," in which environmental recovery fails to keep pace with the degradation caused by palm oil expansion.

Keywords

asymmetric impact circular economy ecological footprint palm oil production trade openness

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Manulusi, M. R., Kaseger, J. G., Adlu, A. M., Tungka, E. M. ., & Sendow, S. J. (2026). Asymmetric Impacts of Palm Oil Expansion and Industrial Downstreaming on Ecological Footprint: Evidence from Indonesia. Advances in Economics & Financial Studies, 4(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.60079/aefs.v4i2.777
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Acobta, A. N., Ayompe, L. M., Crook, E. D., & Egoh, B. N. (2025). Mapping ecosystem services change under land use change for oil palm expansion. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2025.100176
  2. Ariesca, R., Sau, A. A. W. T., Adinugroho, W. C., Setiawan, A. A. R., Ahamed, T., & Noguchi, R. (2023). Land Swap Option for Sustainable Production of Oil Palm Plantations in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032394
  3. Bok, C. H., Lim, C. H., Ngan, S. L., How, B. S., Ng, W. P. Q., & Lam, H. L. (2022). Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing analysis for uncertified and Malaysia sustainable palm oil - MSPO-certified independent smallholders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134646
  4. Dewi, G. D. P. (2021). Multi-stakeholder engagement in the Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) framework. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 729(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/729/1/012085
  5. Edwards, R. B. (2026). Export agriculture and rural poverty: Evidence from Indonesian palm oil. Journal of International Economics, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2025.104209
  6. Erdi, Nawireja, I. K., Wibowo, L. R., Hutabarat, S., Utomo, M. M. B., Kurniasari, D. R., Pramudya, E. P., Hapsari, M., Fuad, Z., Kurniadi, R., Santosa, A., Nugraha, I., Hakim, I., Rizieq, R., Ramawati, & Satwiko, A. A. (2026). Acceleration of Smallholder Palm Oil Certification in Riau: Between Rationality and Policy Utopia. Forest Science and Technology, 22(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2025.2565629
  7. Gandhi, P., & Takanashi, F. (2025). The development of an integrated and sustainable palm oil downstream industry: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of International Studies, 18(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-2/11
  8. Gaveau, D. L. A., Locatelli, B., Salim, M. A., Manurung, T., Descals, A., Angelsen, A., Meijaard, E., & Sheil, D. (2022). Slowing deforestation in Indonesia follows declining oil palm expansion and lower oil prices. PLoS ONE, 17(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266178
  9. Granger, C. W. J., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden Cointegration. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313831
  10. Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
  11. Hornborg, A. (1998). Towards an ecological theory of unequal exchange: articulating world system theory and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00100-6
  12. Jänicke, M. (2008). Ecological modernization: new perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.011
  13. Jayathilake, H. M., Jamaludin, J., De Alban, J. D. T., Webb, E. L., & Carrasco, L. R. (2023). The conversion of rubber to oil palm and other land cover types in Southeast Asia. Applied Geography, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102838
  14. Jorgenson, A. K. (2006). Unequal Ecological Exchange and Environmental Degradation: A Theoretical Proposition and Cross‐National Study of Deforestation, 1990–2000*. Rural Sociology, 71(4), 685–712. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601106781262016
  15. Lamsali, H., Salleh, M. N., Lazim, H. M., Iteng, R., Sidique, S. F. A., & Chalil, D. (2025). Examining Oil Palm Smallholders’ Capacity, Perceived Capability, and Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 556 LNCE, 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8712-8_57
  16. Ming, L. K., Turan, F. M., & Sazali, N. (2024). Assessing the Negative Impact of Palm Oil Industry in Malaysia through a Systemic Method. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics, 116(1), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.37934/aram.116.1.183192
  17. Mukhlis, M., Utomo, S., & Wijaya, M. (2025). Towards an Environmentally Friendly Palm Oil Industry: A Critical Review of Waste Reduction Policies by Indonesian Government. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 20(7), 2955–2962. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200719
  18. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  19. Pramudya, E. P., Wibowo, L. R., Nurfatriani, F., Nawireja, I. K., Kurniasari, D. R., Hutabarat, S., Kadarusman, Y. B., Iswardhani, A. O., & Rafik, R. (2022). Incentives for Palm Oil Smallholders in Mandatory Certification in Indonesia. Land, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040576
  20. Purnomo, H., Okarda, B., Juniyanti, L., Kusumadewi, S. D., Puspitaloka, D., Azzahra, M., Nadhira, S., Irawan, P., Liswanti, N., Schoneveld, G. C., & Brady, M. A. (2025). Advancing palm oil sustainability to address the climate crisis: Leveraging theory of change and system dynamics model at the jurisdictional level. Forest Policy and Economics, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103594
  21. Rifa’i, A. (2025). Economy-wide impacts of palm oil downstream in North Sumatra: A CGE approach. World Development Perspectives, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2025.100706
  22. Senawi, R., Rahman, N. K., Mansor, N., & Kuntom, A. (2019). Transformation of oil palm independent smallholders through Malaysian sustainable palm oil. Journal of Oil Palm Research, 31(3), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.21894/jopr.2019.0038
  23. Shahimi, S., Hafizuddin-Syah, B. A. M., & S.F, H. (2023). Sustainability Practices and Financial Profitability: The Case of the World’s Top 20 Crude Palm Oil Producers. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231203832
  24. Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modeling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework. In Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281–314). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
  25. Xin, Y., Sun, L., & Hansen, M. C. (2022). Oil palm reconciliation in Indonesia: Balancing rising demand and environmental conservation towards 2050. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135087
  26. Yuslaini, N., Maulidiah, S., & Abdillah, A. (2026). Palm oil industry investments in local community welfare and local government intervention through sustainable practical strategies for resilient economic: environmental outcomes. Discover Environment, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-026-00515-8
  27. Yusuf, F. R., Suprihatin, S., & Indrasti, N. S. (2025). Improving the environmental performance of palm oil industry through the utilization of empty oil palm bunches as organic fertilizer and biochar for soil amendment. Environmental Challenges, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101185
  28. Zhao, J., Cochrane, M., Lee, J., Zhang, X., & Elmore, A. (2025). Managing sustainable expansion of smallholder oil palms with strategic spatial planning of land use. Journal of Land Use Science, 20(1), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2025.2583927