Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1535 Download : 932

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the evolution of employment law and its consequential impact on contemporary workplace dynamics. The research aims to elucidate the developmental trajectory of employment law and how these legal frameworks influence organizational behavior and labor market outcomes.


Research Design and Methodology: A comprehensive review of pertinent literature was conducted, employing a qualitative, descriptive research methodology. This approach involved systematic examination and synthesis of existing studies, providing a nuanced understanding of the historical antecedents and contemporary phenomena influencing employment law.


Findings and Discussion: The findings reveal that employment law has significantly evolved from its nascent stages during the Industrial Revolution to the complex legal frameworks of today. Key developments include establishing minimum wage laws, anti-discrimination statutes, and regulations addressing non-standard employment forms. The study highlights the impact of these legal changes on organizational practices, employee well-being, and broader economic dynamics. Technological advancements and globalization are critical drivers of recent legal adaptations, raising new challenges and opportunities within the gig economy and digital workspaces.


Implications: The evolution of employment law underscores the importance of robust legal protections for promoting fair and equitable workplaces. Policymakers and organizational leaders are encouraged to continuously adapt legal frameworks to address emerging challenges, ensuring the protection of workers' rights, and fostering inclusive and dynamic work environments. Further interdisciplinary research is essential to inform effective policy interventions and enhance the adaptability of employment law in the face of ongoing socio-economic transformations.

Keywords

Employment Law Evolution Workplace Dynamics Legal Protections Gig Economy Technological Advancements

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fauzi, F. A., Ibrahim, M. B. H., Irawan, A., Akbar, M. A., & Yendra, Y. (2024). The Evolution of Employment Law and Its Impact on Workplace Dynamics. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v2i1.184
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3-30.
  2. Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553-1597.
  3. Barry, J., & Wilkinson, F. (2021). Ensuring fairness in employment: The role of anti-discrimination laws in promoting equal opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 198(4), 623-640.
  4. De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 471-504.
  5. Estlund, C. L. (2014). Regoverning the workplace: From self-regulation to co-regulation. New York University Law Review, 89(3), 425-479.
  6. Freeman, R. B., & Kleiner, M. M. (2017). The impact of New Deal labor legislation on labor markets: A natural experiment in administrative burden. Working Paper 24219, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  7. Garcia, E., & Martinez, A. (2022). The future of work: Labor market institutions in the digital age. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 36(1), 61-80.
  8. Gupta, A., & Singh, M. (2024). Remote work in the gig economy: Legal challenges and policy responses. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(2), 245-261.
  9. Johnson, M. J., et al. (2023). Gig workers in the platform economy: Labor classification and employment status. Industrial Relations, 62(1), 99-125.
  10. Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2019). The rise and nature of alternative work arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. ILR Review, 72(2), 382-416.
  11. Morin, J. (2005). Globalization and labor law: Perspectives from Europe and the United States. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 26(1), 35-72.
  12. Rogers, B. R. (2020). Technological change and the future of work: The impact of labor and employment laws. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 41(1), 1-46.
  13. Rose, J. (2016). Changing norms and expectations in employment law: Implications for workers and employers. Harvard Law Review, 129(6), 1542-1581.
  14. Sellers, K. F. (2020). The economics of labor and employment law. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(3), 653-720.
  15. Smith, P., & Wood, A. (2019). Labor law and collective bargaining: Recent developments and future prospects. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15, 263-284.
  16. Smith, R., et al. (2023). Promoting diversity and inclusion in the workplace: The role of anti-discrimination laws and affirmative action policies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(3), 459-478.
  17. Stone, K. J. (2016). From industrial jurisprudence to collective labor law: The influence of historical labor movements on contemporary legal frameworks. Labor Studies Journal, 41(4), 309-330.
  18. Tharp, B. M. (2005). The balance between efficiency, equity, and voice in the workplace: An analysis of labor and employment laws. Labor Law Journal, 56(3), 143-167.