Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 84 Download : 6

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the influence of servant leadership on employee engagement among Generation Z employees and to investigate whether mental well-being mediates the relationship between servant leadership and employee engagement.


Research Design and Methodology: A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 148 Generation Z employees in Jakarta, Indonesia. Respondents were selected using convenience sampling. Data were collected through online questionnaires and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).


Findings and Discussion: The results indicate that servant leadership has a positive and significant effect on employee engagement. However, mental well-being does not significantly mediate the relationship between servant leadership and employee engagement. These findings suggest that Generation Z employees are more responsive to leadership behaviors characterized by support, empowerment, and service orientation than to their psychological well-being in developing workplace engagement. The results further demonstrate that servant leadership directly strengthens employee engagement without relying on improvements in mental well-being.


Implications: Organizations should strengthen servant leadership competencies through leadership development initiatives that emphasize empathy, empowerment, and employee support. Although mental well-being was not a significant mediator, organizations should continue promoting employee psychological health to support workforce sustainability.


Originality: This study challenges the assumption that mental well-being is a necessary mechanism linking servant leadership and employee engagement among Generation Z employees.

Keywords

servant leadership mental well-being employee engagement generation z leadership

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fakhri, M., & Silvianita, A. (2026). Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement Among Generation Z: Examining the Mediating Role of Mental Well-Being. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 4(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v4i2.772
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdullah, D. N. M. A., Zakaria, R., Dahalan, N. A., Zaman, M. D. K., & Ishak, Z. A. (2024). The Relationship Between Employee Engagement, Physical Wellness, Work-Life Balance and Employee Well-Being. Information Management and Business Review, 16, 552–563. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v16i3s(i)a.4223
  2. Alzghoul, A., lehyeh, S. A., Alnawafleh, E. A. T., & Alsheikh, G. A. A. (2023). Servant leadership and employee well-being: Mediating role of job burnout, role overload, and anxiety in the Jordanian hospitality sector. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(4), 384–397. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(4).2023.30
  3. Andersen, L. P., Pihl‐Thingvad, J., & Andersen, D. R. (2025). How Superiors Support Employees to Manage Emotional Demands: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(5), 670–670. (40427787). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050670
  4. Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008
  5. Ashraf, T., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020). The Impact of Employee Engagement on Employee Retention: The Role of Psychological Capital, Control at Work, General Well-Being and Job Satisfaction. Human Resource Research, 4(1), 67–67. https://doi.org/10.5296/hrr.v4i1.16477
  6. Ayyashi, N., Alshowkan, A., & Shdaifat, E. (2024, June 24). Exploring the relationship between psychosocial factors, work engagement, and mental health: A structural equation modeling analysis among faculty in Saudi Arabia [Letter]. In BMC Public Health (Vol. 24, Issue 1). BioMed Central. (38914969). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19114-4
  7. Bernuzzi, C., Paganin, G., Petrilli, S., & Margheritti, S. (2025). Old trends in new clothing? Exploring the quiet quitting phenomenon through a scoping review. Current Psychology, 44(11), 10990–11010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07920-x
  8. Bordoloi, S., Sharma, A., & Dhar, R. L. (2025). Leveraging SOR theory to understand quiet quitting: Systematic insights from existing research. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-025-00518-4
  9. Bregenzer, A., & Jiménez, P. (2021). Risk Factors and Leadership in a Digitalized Working World and Their Effects on Employees’ Stress and Resources: Web-Based Questionnaire Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3). (33709933). https://doi.org/10.2196/24906
  10. Campton, J., Tham, A., & Ting, H. (2023). Quiet Quitting – Implications for Asian Businesses. Asian Journal of Business Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.230153
  11. Canavesi, A., & Minelli, E. (2022). Servant Leadership and Employee Engagement: A Qualitative Study. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 34(4), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-021-09389-9
  12. Carter, D., & Baghurst, T. (2014). The Influence of Servant Leadership on Restaurant Employee Engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1882-0
  13. Chen, B., Wang, L., Li, B., & Liu, W. (2022). Work stress, mental health, and employee performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. (36425815). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006580
  14. Chen, X., Masukujjaman, M., Mamun, A. A., Gao, J., & Makhbul, Z. K. M. (2023). Modeling the significance of work culture on burnout, satisfaction, and psychological distress among the Gen-Z workforce in an emerging country. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02371-w
  15. Chitamba, A. (2025). The interplay of psychological safety, quiet quitting, and employee resilience: A framework for sustainable workplace engagement. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 14(5), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.4121
  16. Coun, M. J. H., Ruiter, M. D., & Peters, P. (2023). At your service: Supportiveness of servant leadership, communication frequency and communication channel fostering job satisfaction across generations. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. (37720648). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183203
  17. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
  18. Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
  19. Davis, P., & Needham, C. (2023). Lower Levels of Organizational Commitment among Generation Y and Z Workers within the Scope of Central New York Hospitals and Higher Turnover Rates. Open Journal of Business and Management, 11(5), 2707–2730. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2023.115147
  20. Dwidienawati, D., Pradipto, Y. D., Indrawati, L., & Gandasari, D. (2025). Internal and external factors influencing Gen Z wellbeing. BMC Public Health, 25(1), 1584–1584. (40301875). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22124-5
  21. Erschens, R., Seifried-Dübon, T., Stuber, F., Rieger, M. A., Zipfel, S., Nikendei, C., Genrich, M., Angerer, P., Maatouk, I., Gündel, H., Rothermund, E., Peters, M., & Junne, F. (2022). The association of perceived leadership style and subjective well-being of employees in a tertiary hospital in Germany. PLoS ONE, 17(12). (36512621). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278597
  22. Gašková, J. (2020). Servant Leadership and Its Relation to Work Performance. Central European Business Review, 9(3), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.236
  23. Gorda, A. A. N. E. S., Subrata, I. W. W., Saputra, I. G. N. W. H., Jamil, N. S., Singh, S. K., Gautama, A. A. N. R., & Wardani, K. D. K. A. (2025). Unraveling the effects of polychronic orientation and distributive justice on turnover intention: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, 15(2), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.12928/fokus.v15i2.13094
  24. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  25. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  26. Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
  27. Hartanto, O. (2024). Exploring Comprehensive Approaches to Employee Health and Happiness. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 2(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v2i1.246
  28. Hartati, H., Setiawan, A., Alyyasa-Gan, S. S., & Machmud, M. (2026). The Influence of Leadership and Motivation on Performance in High-Discipline Organizations: A Study of Brimob Personnel. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 4(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v4i1.749
  29. Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J., & Westman, M. (2017). Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
  30. Hongyu, M. (2024). Conservation of Resource Theory. In The ECPH Encyclopedia of Psychology (pp. 1–2). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6000-2_1292-1
  31. Jabłońska‐Wołoszyn, M., & Kurek, D. (2021). Intergenerational Differences as a Challenge of Leaders in the Process of Building Commitment of Employees in a Public Organization – An Empirical Research. EUROPEAN RESEARCH STUDIES JOURNAL, 798–812. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2156
  32. Kashfitanto, D., & Febriansyah, H. (2023). The Effect of Work Stress and Work Values on Turnover Intention of Generation Z Employees in Call Center Company (Case Study of PT ABC in Java, Indonesia). International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i7-13
  33. Κatsaros, K. K. (2024). Gen Z Employee Adaptive Performance: The Role of Inclusive Leadership and Workplace Happiness. Administrative Sciences, 14(8), 163–163. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080163
  34. Khusanova, R., Kang, S., & Choi, S. B. (2021). Work Engagement Among Public Employees: Antecedents and Consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. (34744859). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684495
  35. Kuchenbaur, M., & Peter, R. (2022). Quality of leadership and self-rated health: The moderating role of ‘Effort–Reward Imbalance’: A longitudinal perspective. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 96(3), 473–482. (36478030). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01941-w
  36. Laiman, B., Erika, Laurensia, K., Sun, P., & Djoenarko, R. H. (2023). Factors Affecting Employee Engagement of Generation Z during the Transition from COVID-19 Pandemic to Endemic. TIJAB (The International Journal of Applied Business), 7(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.20473/tijab.v7.i2.2023.42947
  37. Li, P., Sun, J., Taris, T. W., Xing, L., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2020). Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101458–101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101458
  38. Lin, S., Scott, B. A., & Matta, F. K. (2018). The Dark Side of Transformational Leader Behaviors for Leaders Themselves: A Conservation of Resources Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5), 1556–1582. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1255
  39. Lu, Y., Zhang, M. M., Yang, M. M., & Wang, Y. (2022). Sustainable human resource management practices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: Toward common good values. Human Resource Management, 62(3), 331–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22153
  40. Lundqvist, D., Reineholm, C., Ståhl, C., & Wallo, A. (2022). The impact of leadership on employee well-being: On-site compared to working from home. BMC Public Health, 22(1). (36424558). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14612-9
  41. Mărginean, A. E. (2021). Gen Z Perceptions and Expectations upon Entering the Workforce. European Review of Applied Sociology, 14(22), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/eras-2021-0003
  42. Marmara, J., Zarate, D., Vassallo, J., Patten, R., & Stavropoulos, V. (2022). Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Measurement invariance across genders and item response theory examination. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00720-z
  43. Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069–1107. (34886729). https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988
  44. Miralles, S., Pessi, A. B., Pozo-Hidalgo, M., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. (2024). Leading matters! Linking compassion and mindfulness in organizations through servant leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. (38655220). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1346751
  45. Miranda, A. R., Rivadero, L., Bruera, J., Villarreal, V., Bernio, L. Y., Baydas, L. de los Á., Brizuela, M. L., & Serra, S. V. (2020). Examining the relationship between engagement and perceived stress-related cognitive complaints in the argentinian working population. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(1), 12–31. (33680167). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i1.1832
  46. Negoro, M. D., Suseno, J., Samual, R., Darmawan, A. M., & Akbar, A. (2025). The effect of job crafting on work performance: Mediating role of work engagement and social capital. Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, 15(1), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.12928/fokus.v15i1.12493
  47. Ngobeni, S. P., Tebele, C., & Siwela, S. (2026). The Psychosocial Experiences of Gen Z Entry-Level Employees in Corporate Organisations. Administrative Sciences, 16(2), 96–96. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci16020096
  48. Nieżurawska, J., Kycia, R. A., & Niemczynowicz, A. (2023). Managing Generation Z. https://doi.org/10.4324/978100335393
  49. Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
  50. Oraibi, B.-A. M., Bawazir, A. A., & Emam, A. S. (2024). Keeping Pace with the Generations! Quantitative Job Insecurity and Retention in Gen Z Workers: The Mediating Roles of Affective Commitment and Psychological Empowerment. International Review of Management and Marketing, 15(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.17298
  51. Pathak, D. S., & Bhayani, S. (2025). Stress and Coping Mechanisms among Generation Z in the Workplace: A Synthesized Study. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.56975/ijnrd.v10i7.308328
  52. Puspitasari, T. W., Akbar, M. A., & Lina, R. (2025). Leadership Style and Work Discipline on employee performance. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 3(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v3i1.321
  53. Putri, J. F. A., Yendra, Y., & Marihi, L. O. (2025). Organizational Commitment on Member Performance Through Job Satisfaction. Advances in Human Resource Management Research, 3(3), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.60079/ahrmr.v3i3.329
  54. Putri, S. E. S., Salendu, A., & Pahlawan, A. W. (2025). Understanding turnover intention in Gen Z: Servant leadership and ethical climate in organization. Asian Management and Business Review, 216–230. https://doi.org/10.20885/ambr.vol5.iss1.art14
  55. Revuru, I., & Bandaru, K. K. (2024). Leadership Practices for Sustaining Work Engagement: A Gen-Z Perspective. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 451–466. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2024.60424
  56. Rivkin, W., Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K. (2014). The Positive Relationship between Servant Leadership and Employees’ Psychological Health: A Multi-Method Approach. German Journal of Human Resource Management Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 28, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221402800104
  57. Salem, M. R. M. (2025). Designing future-ready workplaces: How Gen Z’s preferred work type influence retention intention; mediating role of perceived autonomy in Malaysian SMEs. Future Business Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00643-2
  58. Shafi, M., Rabbani, S., Alam, R. M., & Gul, S. (2020). Servant Leadership: Impact on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Knowledge Sharing Behavior. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.4.63
  59. Syafei, M. Y., Rahadi, D. R., Masduki, & Sianturi, G. (2023). Work Stress and Generation Z Workplace Behavior. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 6(8), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.37502/ijsmr.2023.6806
  60. Widanti, P. P., & Sunaryo, S. (2022). Job Demands-job Resources and Organizational Trust: Mediation Role of Employee Engagement, Psychological Well-being, and Transformational Leadership. International Journal of Economics Business and Management Research, 6(3), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.51505/ijebmr.2022.6304
  61. Wiroko, E. P. (2021). The Role of Servant Leadership and Resilience in Predicting Work Engagement. Journal of Resilient Economies (ISSN 2653-1917), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.25120/jre.1.1.2021.3821
  62. Xiu, L., Lv, F., & Dierendonck, D. van. (2023). The interplay of servant leadership behaviors and Machiavellianism on perceived leader effectiveness: The role of team conflict management. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 33(3), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejmbe-09-2022-0281
  63. Yagil, D., & Oren, R. (2021). Servant Leadership, Engagement, and Employee Outcomes: The Moderating Roles of Proactivity and Job Autonomy. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 37(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2021a1
  64. Zada, M., Khan, J., Saeed, I., & Zada, S. (2024). Examining the nexus between servant leadership and employee task performance: The moderation mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04052-8
  65. Zahari, S. N. S., & Puteh, F. (2023). Gen Z Workforce and Job-Hopping Intention: A Study among University Students in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i1/15540
  66. Zhang, X., & Deng, G. (2025). Protecting work engagement from digital fatigue: The contingent roles of leadership style and network ties. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1645057–1645057. (41323907). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1645057