Main Article Content

Abstract

Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Kapabilitas Teknologi Informasi terhadap Efisiensi Pengelolaan Keuangan, dengan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen sebagai variabel mediasi dan Kualitas Informasi Akuntansi sebagai variabel moderasi, pada UMKM di Kota Jayapura.


Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain explanatory research. Populasi penelitian berjumlah 147 UMKM, dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 100 responden yang ditentukan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui penyebaran kuesioner dan dianalisis menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) dengan bantuan SmartPLS 4.


Hasil dan Pembahasan: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Kapabilitas Teknologi Informasi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap Efisiensi Pengelolaan Keuangan serta Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen. Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen berpengaruh positif terhadap Efisiensi Pengelolaan Keuangan serta mampu memediasi pengaruh Kapabilitas Teknologi Informasi terhadap Efisiensi Pengelolaan Keuangan. Kualitas informasi akuntansi melemahkan hubungan antara sistem akuntansi manajemen dan efisiensi pengelolaan keuangan.


Implikasi: Implikasi penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan efisiensi pengelolaan keuangan UMKM memerlukan penguatan kapabilitas teknologi informasi yang diintegrasikan dengan penerapan Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen yang efektif.


Originalitas: Penelitian ini memperkaya pengembangan Resource-Based View, Information Processing Theory, dan Contingency Theory, serta menjadi dasar bagi pemerintah daerah dan pelaku UMKM dalam merumuskan strategi transformasi digital dan memperkuat sistem pengelolaan keuangan guna meningkatkan daya saing usaha.

Keywords

teknologi informasi sistem akuntansi manajemen kualitas informasi akuntansi efisiensi pengelolaan keuangan UMKM

Article Details

How to Cite
Labo, I. A., Sonjaya, Y., & Zakaria, Z. (2026). Pengaruh Kapabilitas Teknologi Informasi terhadap Efisiensi Pengelolaan Keuangan: Peran Mediasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen dan Moderasi Kualitas Informasi Akuntansi. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 4(2), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.60079/ajeb.v4i2.1019

References

  1. Abu Afifa, M. M., & Saleh, I. (2022). Management accounting systems effectiveness, perceived environmental uncertainty and companies’ performance: the case of Jordanian companies. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(2), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2020-2288
  2. Afifa, M. A., & Nguyen, N. M. (2024). An Investigation of Antecedents and Outcomes of Accounting Information Quality: Evidence from SMEs. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective. https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629241231419
  3. Akbar, T., & Amir, H. (2024). Exploring Strategic Adaptation in MSMEs during the Digital Transformation Era in Indonesia. Journal of Business Administration and Entrepreneurship Innovation, 1(02), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.32722/baei.v1i02.7325
  4. Al-Dmour, A., Zaidan, H., & Al Natour, A. R. (2023). The impact knowledge management processes on business performance via the role of accounting information quality as a mediating factor. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(3), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-12-2020-0219
  5. Al-Hattami, H. M., & Kabra, J. D. (2024). The influence of accounting information system on management control effectiveness: The perspective of SMEs in Yemen. Information Development, 40(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669221087184
  6. Ascani, I., Sardini, A., Montemari, M., & Chiucchi, M. S. (2026). Orchestrating the flow of information for decision making: new dynamics between management accountants and operational managers leveraging business intelligence & analytics systems. Journal of Management Control, 37(1), 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-026-00413-3
  7. Barney, J. B. (2000). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. In J. A. C. Baum & F. Dobbin (Eds.), Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management (Vol. 17, pp. 203–227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4
  8. Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
  9. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2–3), 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
  10. Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The Impact of Structure, Environment, and Interdependence on the Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems. Source: The Accounting Review, 61(1), 16–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/247520%5Cnhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  11. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  12. Galbraith, Jay. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Trans.). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1–50. https://doi.org/books.google.co.id/books?id=FUe3AAAAIAAJ
  13. Gyamera, E., Abayaawien Atuilik, W., Eklemet, I., Henry Matey, A., Tetteh, L. A., & Kwasi Apreku-Djan, P. (2023). An analysis of the effects of management accounting services on the financial performance of SME: The moderating role of information technology. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2183559
  14. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  15. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  16. Hiebl, M. R. W., Thaller, J., Dohmen, C. J., & Papiorek, K. L. (2026). Management accounting information systems sophistication, family control, and controller involvement in strategy development. European Accounting Review, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2026.2619581
  17. IASB. (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, International Accounting Standards Board. IFRS Foundation. https://doi.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/conceptual-framework
  18. Kusumawardhani, F. K., Ratmono, D., Wibowo, S. T., Darsono, D., Widyatmoko, S., & Rokhman, N. (2024). The impact of digitalization in accounting systems on information quality, cost reduction and decision making: Evidence from SMEs. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(2), 1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.11.023
  19. Minh, D. N., & Toan, P. N. (2024). The Impact of Management Accounting Information and the Moderating Role of Cloud Computing on Decision Making in SMEs: Research in Vietnam. Management and Accounting Review, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.24191/MAR.V23i03-06
  20. Nguyen, T., Le-Anh, T., Nguyen Thi Hong, N., Huong Nguyen, L. T., & Nguyen Xuan, T. (2025). Digital transformation in accounting of Vietnamese small and medium enterprises. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 23(2), 769–787. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2023-0761
  21. Nuraliati, A., Astuti, A., Ali Januarty, T., Johan, A., & Sudarmadi, D. (2025). An investigation of antecedents and outcomes of accounting information quality: Evidence from SMEs. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 53–63. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol29.iss1.art5
  22. OECD. (2021). The Digital Transformation of SMEs (OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. In OECD Publishing. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bdb9256a-en
  23. Pereira, C., Castro, B., Gomes, L., & Canha, H. (2024). Firms’ Investment Level and (In)Efficiency: The Role of Accounting Information System Quality. International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12010009
  24. Putro, H. P. (2023). The Impact of Information Technology Implementation in Accounting on the Effectiveness of Management Decision Making: A Qualitative Study. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(1), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v6i1.969
  25. Sagala, G. H., & Őri, D. (2024). Toward SMEs digital transformation success: a systematic literature review. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 22(4), 667–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-024-00682-2
  26. Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.337
  27. Ylä-Kujala, A., Kouhia-Kuusisto, K., Ikäheimonen, T., Laine, T., & Kärri, T. (2023). Management accounting adoption in small businesses: interfaces with challenges and performance. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(6), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-07-2022-0100