Archiving & Digital Preservation
Long-Term Accessibility, Scholarly Record & Disaster-Recovery Policy
 

Advances in Human Resource Management Research (AHRMR) recognizes long-term preservation of scholarly content as an essential component of responsible academic publishing.

The journal is committed to protecting the integrity, accessibility, discoverability, persistence, and continuity of its published scholarly record, including articles, issues, bibliographic metadata, DOI information, supplementary materials where applicable, corrections, retractions, Expressions of Concern, and other publication-related records.

AHRMR's preservation framework is intended to support continued access to published content in the event of technical failure, server migration, domain changes, software changes, organizational transition, publisher transition, or other circumstances that may affect the primary journal website.

 
Preservation Principles
Integrity, continuity and accessibility of the scholarly record
 
Long-Term Accessibility
Published scholarly content should remain accessible beyond the operational lifetime of a particular server, software installation, hosting arrangement, or website configuration.
Record Integrity
Published Versions of Record and their bibliographic metadata should be protected against unauthorized, undocumented, or misleading alteration.
Persistent Identification
DOIs and other bibliographic metadata should continue to resolve to the appropriate scholarly record when technical infrastructure or URLs change.
Recoverability
Journal infrastructure and essential publication data should be capable of restoration following technical failure, data loss, migration, or other significant disruption.
 
External Long-Term Preservation
Transparent preservation-service status
 
Current Status
AHRMR does not publicly claim active coverage by an external long-term digital-preservation service unless successful participation, content deposit, and preservation status have been confirmed.

The journal intends to use an appropriate external long-term preservation mechanism compatible with its publishing infrastructure and recognized scholarly-preservation practices.

Potential preservation mechanisms may include the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN), LOCKSS, CLOCKSS, Internet Archive, or another recognized preservation service, subject to technical compatibility, eligibility, successful activation, content deposit, and verified operational status.

Installation of a plugin, creation of an account, submission of an application, or initial technical configuration does not by itself establish active preservation coverage.

When an external preservation arrangement becomes operational and verifiable, AHRMR will update this policy and the relevant journal information to identify the service accurately.

 
Electronic Backup & Disaster-Recovery Plan
Protection against technical disruption and data loss
 

As part of its operational preservation responsibilities, the publisher and technical management should maintain recoverable copies of components reasonably necessary to restore AHRMR following a significant technical incident.

  • OJS database and journal configuration information;
  • Published article files and issue files;
  • Uploaded manuscript and supplementary files where retention is appropriate;
  • Article, author, issue, DOI, and bibliographic metadata;
  • Journal policies and static website content;
  • Post-publication notices and scholarly-record documentation; and
  • Other technical information reasonably necessary for journal restoration or migration.

Backup and restoration arrangements should be reviewed periodically and particularly before major OJS upgrades, server migrations, domain changes, hosting transitions, or other significant infrastructure modifications.

 
Version of Record Preservation
Integrity of formally published scholarly content
 

The formally published article released by AHRMR constitutes the journal's Version of Record.

The Version of Record must not be silently replaced, substantively altered, or removed merely to modify the published scholarly record.

Where a post-publication change is necessary, AHRMR follows the applicable scholarly-record mechanism, which may include a correction, clarification, Expression of Concern, retraction, or other formally documented editorial notice.

Scholarly Record Principle: Changes affecting the meaning, interpretation, integrity, authorship, bibliographic identity, or scientific record of a published article should be documented transparently rather than implemented through undisclosed replacement.
 
DOI & Metadata Continuity
Persistent identification and bibliographic consistency
 

AHRMR uses Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for published scholarly content under DOI prefix 10.60079.

DOIs form part of the persistent bibliographic identity of published articles and should continue to resolve correctly if the journal migrates to a different server, domain, OJS installation, hosting arrangement, or URL structure.

When the location of published content changes, the journal is responsible for updating DOI destination URLs and relevant bibliographic metadata through the appropriate DOI-registration infrastructure.

Metadata Integrity
Article title, author information, publication year, volume, issue, publication date, DOI, license, and other essential bibliographic information should remain consistent across the AHRMR website, Version of Record, DOI metadata, and relevant scholarly-discovery services.
Important: DOI registration and Crossref metadata support persistent identification and discovery, but DOI registration alone is not a substitute for an independent long-term digital-preservation service.
VIEW CROSSREF RECORDS ↗
 
Self-Archiving & Repository Policy
Author rights to preserve and disseminate scholarly work
 

AHRMR supports author self-archiving and responsible dissemination of scholarly research.

Authors may deposit versions of their work in institutional, disciplinary, funder-designated, personal academic, or other appropriate scholarly repositories, subject to accurate identification of the version deposited.

Submitted Version
Permitted
Author's manuscript prior to peer review
Accepted Manuscript
Permitted
Author Accepted Manuscript following peer review
Version of Record
Permitted
Final published article under CC BY 4.0
Embargo: AHRMR does not impose an embargo period on author self-archiving.

When depositing or sharing the Version of Record, authors should include the complete bibliographic citation, DOI or official journal URL, and the applicable CC BY 4.0 license information.

 
Server Migration & Domain Changes
Maintaining access during infrastructure changes
 

If AHRMR migrates to a new server, hosting provider, domain, publishing platform, or OJS installation, the migration should preserve the journal's scholarly, editorial, and bibliographic record to the extent required for continued publication integrity.

Particular attention should be given to preserving:

  • Volume and issue history;
  • Published article files and Versions of Record;
  • Article URLs and DOI resolution;
  • Author and article metadata;
  • Publication dates;
  • Supplementary materials where applicable;
  • Corrections, retractions, Expressions of Concern, and other post-publication notices; and
  • Other records reasonably necessary to preserve scholarly provenance and publication continuity.

Where technically possible, redirects from previous URLs should be maintained to reduce broken links and preserve reader access to the scholarly record.

 
Journal Cessation or Transfer
Protection of published scholarship beyond active journal operation
 

If AHRMR ceases active publication, changes publisher, or transfers publishing operations, reasonable measures should be taken to preserve continuing access to previously published scholarly content.

The published archive should remain accessible through the journal platform, successor platform, verified preservation service, repository, or another appropriate scholarly-access mechanism.

DOI records and destination URLs should be updated where necessary so that persistent identifiers continue to direct readers to the appropriate Version of Record or preserved scholarly record.

 
Preservation Monitoring
Periodic review of preservation arrangements
 

The editorial office, publisher, and relevant technical personnel should periodically review the journal's preservation arrangements to ensure that published content remains accessible and that preservation information displayed on the journal website remains accurate.

Where AHRMR joins an external preservation service, the service should not be described publicly as active until participation and content-preservation status have been successfully verified.

Transparency Principle: AHRMR will not describe itself as archived by a preservation network solely because a plugin has been installed, an account has been created, registration has begun, or a service has been considered. Preservation coverage will be stated only when the relevant arrangement is operational and verifiable.
 
Effective Date & Historical Record
Prospective harmonization from 1 September 2026
 

The current harmonized AHRMR Archiving & Digital Preservation Policy applies prospectively from 1 September 2026.

Previously published volumes, issues, articles, DOI records, publication dates, pagination, corrections, retractions, Expressions of Concern, and other bibliographic records remain part of AHRMR's permanent historical scholarly record.

Implementation of the current preservation framework does not require retrospective alteration of valid historical publication records merely to conform them to later technical or policy arrangements.

 
Digital Preservation Contact
Questions concerning access, metadata and preservation
 
Editorial & Administrative Support
Managing Editor
Digital preservation, broken DOI links, metadata inconsistencies, inaccessible published content, migration, and scholarly-record inquiries
advancesresearch@gmail.com
AHRMR is committed to long-term accessibility, persistent identification, preservation transparency, Version-of-Record integrity, metadata continuity, and responsible protection of the scholarly record.