Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes the relationship between Digital ESG Leadership (DEL) and disclosure quality, strategic integration, and ESG performance at Indonesian technology companies.


Research Method: The study employed a non-experimental, longitudinal, document-based quantitative design. The data included eight technology companies with 39 firm-years of observations from 2019 to 2024. DEL was measured using dictionary-based scoring and contextual coding, while the relationships among variables were analyzed using panel data regression.


Results and Discussion: DEL is positively associated with the quality of ESG disclosure (β = 1.040; p < 0.001), strategic ESG integration (β = 0.997; p < 0.001), and ESG performance (β = 0.896; p < 0.001). These results indicate a statistical relationship, not causality, and should be interpreted with consideration of sample size and potential construct overlap.


Implications: Companies need to align their digital strategies with verifiable ESG targets, governance, and outcomes.


Originality: This study develops DEL as a construct that links digital leadership to the three dimensions of ESG implementation in the context of Indonesian technology companies.

Keywords

Digital ESG Leadership ESG implementation digital leadership document analysis technology companies

Article Details

How to Cite
Ferdiyansyah, I., & Masman, R. R. (2026). Digital ESG Leadership: The Impact of Technology-Based Leadership on ESG Implementation in Indonesian Technology Companies. Advances in Economics & Financial Studies, 4(3), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.60079/aefs.v4i3.1011

References

  1. Atak Atalık, A. (2024). Beyond polarity: How ESG sentiment influences idiosyncratic volatility in the Turkish stock market. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2024.11.003
  2. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
  3. Borah, P. S., Iqbal, S., & Akhtar, S. (2022). Linking social media usage and SME’s sustainable performance: The role of digital leadership and innovation capabilities. Technology in Society, 68, 101900. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101900
  4. Chen, A., Li, L., & Shahid, W. (2024). Digital transformation as the driving force for sustainable business performance: A moderated mediation model of market-driven business model innovation and digital leadership capabilities. Heliyon, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101900
  5. Dewi, S. K., Setiono, H., & Ilmidavviq, M. B. (2024). Pengaruh ROA, CR, dan DER terhadap Nilai Perusahaan pada Sektor. Akuntansi, 3(3), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.55606/akuntansi.v3i3.2024
  6. Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). Shareholders are getting serious about sustainability. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116.
  7. Farhan, M. (2024). Keseimbangan risiko dan imbal hasil dalam strategi investasi berkelanjutan: Pendekatan integratif terhadap faktor lingkungan, sosial, dan tata kelola perusahaan (ESG). Currency (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah), 2(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.32806/ccy.v2i2.241
  8. Feng, Y., & Nie, C. (2024). Digital technology innovation and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance: Evidence from a sample of listed firms in China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2781
  9. Ferjančič, U., Ichev, R., Lončarski, I., Montariol, S., Pelicon, A., Pollak, S., Sitar Šuštar, K., Toman, A., Valentinčič, A., & Žnidaršič, M. (2024). Textual analysis of corporate sustainability reporting and corporate ESG scores. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103669. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103669
  10. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
  11. Hitt, M., Ireland, R., & Hoskisson, R. (2020). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competitiveness and globalization, 13e. Cengage Learning, Boston.
  12. Ignatov, K. (2023). When ESG talks: ESG tone of 10-K reports and its significance to stock markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102745. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102745
  13. Jaiswal, R., Gupta, S., & Tiwari, A. K. (2024). Decoding mood of the Twitterverse on ESG investing: opinion mining and key themes using machine learning. Management Research Review, 47(8), 1221–1252. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-07-2023-0526
  14. Khaw, T. Y., Teoh, A. P., Abdul Khalid, S. N., & Letchmunan, S. (2022). The impact of digital leadership on sustainable performance: a systematic literature review. Journal of Management Development, 41(9–10), 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-03-2022-0070
  15. Kumar, S., Verma, A. K., & Mirza, A. (2024). Digital Revolution, Artificial Intelligence, and Ethical Challenges BT - Digital Transformation, Artificial Intelligence and Society: Opportunities and Challenges (S. Kumar, A. K. Verma, & A. Mirza (eds.); pp. 161–177). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5656-8_11
  16. Lagasio, V. (2024). ESG-washing detection in corporate sustainability reports. International Review of Financial Analysis, 96, 103742. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103742
  17. Liu, X., Yang, Y., Jiang, Y., Fu, Y., Zhong, R. Y., Li, M., & Huang, G. Q. (2023). Data-driven ESG assessment for blockchain services: A comparative study in textiles and apparel industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 190, 106837. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106837
  18. Liu, Z., Chen, Z., & Hu, L. (2024). Can enterprise digital transformation improve ESG performance? Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(7), 5088–5103. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4307
  19. Lu, Y., Xu, C., Zhu, B., & Sun, Y. (2024). Digitalization transformation and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 352–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3494
  20. Lyu, J. (2024). How does digital leadership improve organizational sustainability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 140148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140148
  21. Maibaum, F., Kriebel, J., & Foege, J. N. (2024). Selecting textual analysis tools to classify sustainability information in corporate reporting. Decision Support Systems, 183, 114269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2024.114269
  22. Marani, Y. (2024). Assessing the Role of Sustainability and ESG Accounting in Driving Corporate Performance and Stakeholder Value. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 2(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.60079/ajeb.v2i2.171
  23. Melawati, F. (2025). Kepemimpinan dan perilaku organisasi di era digital: Menavigasi perubahan dan inovasi. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 1055–1065.
  24. Memon, K. R., & Ooi, S. K. (2023). Identifying digital leadership’s role in fostering competitive advantage through responsible innovation: A SEM-Neural Network approach. Technology in Society, 75, 102399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102399
  25. Mo, Z., Liu, Y., Lu, C., & Yu, J. (2023). Influences of industrial internet platform firms’ ESG performance and digital leadership on user firms’ innovation performance: The mediating role of inter-firm trust. Journal of Digital Economy, 2, 204–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2024.01.002
  26. Oroh, N. S. (2026). Corporate Sustainable Performance in Indonesia: Insights, Gaps, and Research Directions. Advances: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 4(2 SE-Articles), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.60079/ajeb.v4i2.793
  27. Qiao, P., Zhao, Y., Fung, A., & Fung, H.-G. (2025). How digital leadership guides ESG sustainability. Research in International Business and Finance, 73, 102644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102644
  28. Schimanski, T., Reding, A., Reding, N., Bingler, J., Kraus, M., & Leippold, M. (2024). Bridging the gap in ESG measurement: Using NLP to quantify environmental, social, and governance communication. Finance Research Letters, 61, 104979. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.104979
  29. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.
  30. Tigre, F. B., Henriques, P. L., & Curado, C. (2025). The digital leadership emerging construct: a multi-method approach. Management Review Quarterly, 75(1), 789–836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00395-9
  31. Wang, H., Jiao, S., Bu, K., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Digital transformation and manufacturing companies’ ESG responsibility performance. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104370
  32. Wang, S., & Esperança, J. P. (2023). Can digital transformation improve market and ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419, 137980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137980
  33. Wicaksono, A. S. (2025). Kepemimpinan yang Efektif dalam Menghadapi Era Digital (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Sektor Industri di Jawa Barat). Co-Value Jurnal Ekonomi Koperasi Dan Kewirausahaan, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.59188/covalue.v15i10.5232
  34. Wulandari, I. S., & Anis, I. (2026). Pengaruh Praktik ESG terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Teknologi yang Terdaftar di BEI. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 5(1 SE-Articles), 2922–2930. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v5i1.6282
  35. Yang, X., & Han, Q. (2024). Nonlinear effects of enterprise digital transformation on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: evidence from China. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(2), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2023-0553
  36. Zhang, A. Y., & Zhang, J. H. (2024). Renovation in environmental, social and governance (ESG) research: the application of machine learning. Asian Review of Accounting, 32(4), 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-07-2023-0201
  37. Zhang, S. (2024). The impact of digital transformation on ESG performance and the moderation of mixed‐ownership reform: The evidence from Chinese state‐owned enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(3), 2195–2210. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2656