Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the protection of freedom of expression as a constitutional right in Indonesia’s digital space, the implementation of restrictions on that right under Law No. 1 of 2024 on Electronic Information and Transactions, and to formulate a model of constitutional balancing between freedom of expression and public order.


Research Method: This study employs a normative legal methodology using legislative, conceptual, and case-based approaches through the analysis of legislation, legal doctrine, and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court.


Results and Discussion: The results of the study indicate that Article 27A and Article 28(2) of Law No. 1 of 2024 protect different interests, thereby requiring interpretive criteria that distinguish between criticism, opinion, satire, factual allegations, defamation, and hate speech. Restrictions on freedom of expression can only be justified if they comply with the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality.


Implications: These findings provide guidance for policymakers and law enforcement officials to enforce the ITE Law more consistently.


Originality: This study proposes the constitutional balancing model as an interpretive framework for assessing the constitutionality of restrictions on freedom of expression in the digital sphere.

Keywords

freedom of expression constitutional balancing EIT Law constitutional rights public order

Article Details

How to Cite
Bangsu, M. N. A. (2026). Freedom of Expression in The Digital Sphere: An Analysis of The Balance Between Constitutional Rights and The Interest of Public Order in Indonesia. Advances in Community Services Research, 4(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.60079/acsr.v4i2.966

References

  1. Alvina, H., Julianti, L., Sugiantari, A. A. P. W., & Udytama, I. W. W. W. (2022). The State of Digital Freedom in Indonesia: An Assessment of Online Censorship, Privacy, and Free Expression. Journal of Digital Law and Policy, 1(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.58982/jdlp.v1i3.301
  2. Apandi, M., Rahayu, K., Prayugo, W. A., & Ariany, L. (2024). Kekaburan Norma dalam Kebebasan Berekspresi di Era Digital: Analisis Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v5i12.1007
  3. Butt, S., & Murharjanti, P. (2022). What constitutes compliance? Legislative responses to Constitutional Court decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014
  4. Fauzi, M., & Info, A. (2025). Penerapan Pasal Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Uu Ite Terhadap Unggahan Media Sosial : Antara Perlindungan Reputasi Dan Kebebasan Berekspresi. Jurnal Normatif Fakultas Hukum Universitas Al Azhar, 545–554. https://doi.org/10.54123/jn.v5i2.490
  5. Feka, M., Sularto, R. B., & Pareke, J. T. (2025). Navigating the Legal Minefield: The Impact of Articles 27A and 27B of Indonesia’s EIT Law on Freedom of Expression and the Path to Legal Reform. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 6(1), 265–304. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i1.19116
  6. Fernando, Z. J., Zico, P., Rozah, U., & Rochaeti, N. (2022). The freedom of expression in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2103944. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2103944
  7. Haritjahjono, B., & Sodikin, S. (2025). Implementation of the Lex Certa Principle towards the Ambiguity of Digital Law’s in Indonesia. Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1 SE-Articles), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v7i1.5873
  8. Haryanto, E. (2025). Implikasi Hukum Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Perubahan Sejumlah Pasal dalam Undang-Undang ITE. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.35968/jihd.v15i2.1528
  9. Hasani, I. (2022). Human Rights and Constitutionality Issues of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia.
  10. Hermanto, Rhogust, M., Endah Lestari, M., & Bahri, S. (2022). The Constitutionality of Restrictions on Freedom of Expression in the Digital Era: An Analysis of Constitutional Court Decisions. Journal of Management, 1(2), 161–170. https://myjournal.or.id/index.php/JOM/article/view/477
  11. Kurnia, T. S., & Melatyugra, N. (2024). Universality of rights as an interpretive principle for the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Const. Rev., 10, 474. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1027
  12. Kusdarini, E. (2025). Konstitusionalisasi Hak atas Kebebasan Berekspresi di Era Digital Pasca-Amandemen UUD 1945. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 8(3), 2387–2402. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.13025
  13. Lailam, T., & Anggia, P. (2023). The Indonesian Constitutional Court Approaches the Proportionality Principle to the Cases Involving Competing Rights. LAW REFORM; Vol 19, No 1 (2023)DO - 10.14710/Lr.V19i1.54087. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i1.54087
  14. Majid, P. S., & Angraeni, B. S. (2025). Constitutional Implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 105/PUU-XXII/2024 on Freedom of Expression and Defamation in Indonesia. Constitutional Law Review, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v4i2.5951
  15. Marwandianto, M., & Nasution, H. A. (2020). Hak atas kebebasan berpendapat dan berekspresi dalam koridor penerapan pasal 310 dan 311 KUHP. Jurnal Ham, 11(1), 1–25.
  16. Natamiharja, R. (2025). Peran negara dalam menjamin kebebasan berekspresi menurut konstitusi dan hukum HAM. Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Dan Kenegaraan, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35912/kihan.v4i1.4574
  17. Pratiwi, C. S. (2021). Rethinking the Constitutionality of Indonesia’s Flawed Anti-Blasphemy Law. Const. Rev., 7, 273.
  18. Roisah, K., Wardana, K. A., & Erlangga, V. L. S. (2024). Human rights defenders in Indonesia’s digital age: navigating limited spaces in the quest for digital democracy. Sriwijaya Law Review, 8(2), 358–375. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss2.3860.pp358-375
  19. Sofwan, E. (2026). Restrictions on the Right to Freedom of Expression in Public from the Perspective of the Rule of Law. International Journal of Community Service (IJCS), 5(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijcs.v5i1.1809
  20. Susianto, Nahuddin, Y. E., & Nurita, R. F. (2025). Freedom of Speech in the Context of Constitutional Law: Maintaining the Balance Between Freedom and Public Order. International Journal of Sustainable Law, 2(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.71131/jjbx9540
  21. Taqwa, M. D. (2026). Improving Judicial Reasoning in Constitutional Rights Cases: The Case for a Structured Proportionality Test in the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 13(1), 1.
  22. Udjari, H., Suwito, Pakpahan, N. H., Hardyansah, R., & Wibowo, A. S. (2022). Reframing Freedom of Speech and Hate Speech Prohibition in a Democratic Indonesian Legal System. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(1), 179–182. https://jos3journals.id/index.php/jos3/article/view/139
  23. Villiers, B. de. (2022). Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech: When Values Collide in Divided Societies. Constitutional Review, 8(2 SE-Articles), 184–214. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev821
  24. Wiranata, Moh.Khamim, & Imam Asmarudin. (2023). Kebebasan Berekspresi Melalui Media Digital dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia. Pancasakti Law Journal (PLJ), 1(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.24905/plj.v1i2.21
  25. Yandy, E. T., Fathoni, M. Al, Sayuti, & Lestiyani, T. E. K. (2026). Freedom of Expression and Its Implications for Citizens’ Constitutional Rights Following Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-XX/2022. Journal of Legal Contemplation, 2(1 SE-Articles), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.63288/jlc.v2i1.17
  26. Yanis, T. Z. A., Saleh, A., & Yanis, A. M. (2025). The Unconstitutionality of the Offence of Insulting the Government in the 2023 Criminal Code: A Critical Review of Freedom of Expression. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v5i1.24739
  27. Zahrah, F., & Habibah, S. M. (2022). Freedom Of Speech and Human Rights: What Can Civic Education Do? Jurnal HAM, 13, 495. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.20222.13.495-508