Subject-Matter Reviewers

Reviewer Assignment and Guidance

All fields explicitly recognized in AHRMR's Aims & Scope have equal standing. Reviewers are invited according to the substantive and methodological needs of each manuscript, relevant expertise, independence, availability, and conflicts of interest. Manuscripts proceeding to external review normally receive double-anonymous assessment by at least two independent reviewers; additional specialist review may be obtained when necessary. Recommendations are advisory, and academic editors retain responsibility for final editorial decisions.

Reviewers must provide objective, constructive, evidence-based reports, distinguish major concerns from minor presentation issues, and assess whether revisions address legitimate earlier concerns. They must maintain confidentiality, avoid unauthorized author contact, author identification or review delegation, coercive citations, and misuse of unpublished information. Confidential manuscripts, data, reports, and correspondence must not be uploaded to publicly accessible AI systems or external services where confidentiality and data protection cannot be assured.

Researchers may register in OJS and indicate reviewer interest; registration does not automatically confer directory membership or guarantee an invitation. Directory details and availability may change. Changes after 1 September 2026 do not retrospectively alter valid historical peer-review or editorial records.

View Peer Review Procedures and Reviewer Responsibilities →   ·   Register in OJS →

Reviewer administration: advancesresearch@gmail.com. Principal academic editorial matters: editor@advancesinresearch.id.