Editorial Leadership

Academic Editors

Marketing, Consumer Behavior & Customer Management

Strategic Management, Innovation & Digital Business

Human Resource Management & Organizational Behavior

Business, Economics & Organizational Studies

Publication and Technical Support

Editorial Independence

Qualified academic editors retain responsibility for scholarly evaluation and scientific-editorial decisions, based on relevance, originality, theoretical or conceptual quality, methodological or review-methodological rigor, research integrity, peer-review evidence, and author responses. All recognized ABIM fields have equal standing. The journal considers Research Papers, Literature Review Papers, and Conceptual Papers under its current manuscript framework.

The Editor-in-Chief provides overall academic leadership. The Managing Editor coordinates workflows, manuscript administration, communications, and operational support. Academic Editors conduct scope assessment, scholarly screening, reviewer selection or coordination, review evaluation, revision verification, and scientific-editorial decisions or recommendations within their assigned expertise and authority.

Academic decisions remain independent of APC payment, ability to pay, waiver eligibility, publisher ownership, institutional relationships, sponsorship, advertising, and commercial interests. Editors must disclose material conflicts and must not participate in screening, reviewer selection, confidential reviewer-information access, assessment, revision evaluation, or decisions for their own submissions or other conflicted manuscripts. Such work is assigned to another qualified and sufficiently independent academic editor.

Editor-authored manuscripts receive no preferential treatment, guaranteed acceptance, exemption from scholarly requirements, or expedited scientific evaluation. Eligible manuscripts normally undergo double-anonymous peer review by at least two independent reviewers. Recommendations are advisory; the responsible academic editor evaluates the complete scholarly and editorial record before reaching or recommending the final decision.

After final acceptance, administrative, copyediting, indexing, production, communication, and technical personnel support publication preparation but do not independently determine scientific acceptance or rejection. Material scientific, ethical, legal, authorship, metadata, or integrity concerns must be referred to the responsible academic editor. Support personnel must not introduce unsupported claims, alter findings, or independently resolve substantive scientific disputes.

Appointments and operational assignments may change. Legitimate updates do not retrospectively alter valid editorial decisions, reviewer records, publication dates, DOI records, volume or issue assignments, or other established scholarly information. Detailed role boundaries are stated on the Ownership & Management page.

PERLU VERIFIKASI — external profiles: Names, appointments, affiliations, and profile links above follow the supplied ABIM directory. Current external-profile content and identifier-to-person matches have not all been independently confirmed. The Google Scholar identifier supplied for Muhammad Safuan Abdul Latip differs between the ABIM and AHRMR source materials; the ABIM link is retained pending verification.

Publication Ethics · Publisher Governance · Peer Review Procedures · Editorial Contact