Subject-Matter Reviewers

PERLU VERIFIKASI — directory details: External Google Scholar and Scopus profile contents could not be independently inspected because access was restricted. Unless otherwise supported by an institutional source, affiliations and profile links reproduce the supplied ABIM directory and require administrative confirmation of current accuracy. Khalid Eltayeb Elfaki's current affiliation and linked profiles follow the UCSI institutional directory; this update does not amend affiliations recorded in earlier publications.

Reviewer Assignment and Guidance

All fields explicitly recognized in ABIM's Aims & Scope have equal standing. A substantive contribution to any one recognized field is sufficient for scope consideration; an additional marketing, industrial marketing, business, finance, accounting, or other disciplinary variable is not mandatory when another recognized field independently establishes relevance.

ABIM considers Research Papers, Literature Review Papers, and Conceptual Papers. Reviewers are selected according to the manuscript's subject, theoretical or conceptual foundation, methodological requirements, independence, availability, and conflicts of interest. Manuscripts proceeding to external review normally receive double-anonymous assessment by at least two independent reviewers. Additional qualified specialists may be invited beyond this directory when necessary. Recommendations are advisory; responsible academic editors retain authority for scientific-editorial decisions.

Reviewers must provide objective, constructive, evidence-based reports, distinguish major concerns from minor presentation issues, and assess whether revisions address legitimate earlier concerns. They must maintain confidentiality and avoid unauthorized author contact, author identification, review delegation, coercive citations, or misuse of unpublished information. Confidential manuscripts, data, reports, and correspondence must not be uploaded to publicly accessible AI systems or external services where appropriate authorization, confidentiality, and data protection cannot be assured.

Actual or potential financial, professional, institutional, supervisory, collaborative, competitive, or personal conflicts must be disclosed. Editors who also serve as reviewers must not assess, manage, or decide their own manuscripts or other materially conflicted submissions. Such manuscripts must be assigned to an appropriate independent academic editor.

Researchers may register in OJS and indicate reviewer interest. Registration does not automatically confer directory membership or guarantee an invitation. Directory details and availability may change; legitimate updates do not retrospectively alter completed peer-review records, editorial decisions, publication dates, DOI records, or other established scholarly records.

View Peer Review Procedures and Reviewer Responsibilities → · Register in OJS → · Publication Ethics →

Reviewer administration: Muh. Haerdiansyah Syahnur, Managing Editor, at advancesresearch@gmail.com. Principal academic editorial matters may be referred to Mohammad Ashoer, Editor-in-Chief, at editor@advancesinresearch.id. Review invitations, reports, and manuscript-specific correspondence should ordinarily use the official OJS workflow.